Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A trust based energy and mobility aware routing protocol to improve infotainment services in VANETs

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network (VANET) is a collection of self-organized high mobility vehicles connected wirelessly without any central management. In this, infotainment services like, live video streaming for entertainment and emergency message dissemination for driver safety has gained incredible attention. Since mobile vehicles relay on battery power, fast and reliable broadcasting of multimedia and emergency messages has become one of the key challenges. Towards this, an Energy and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol (EM-ARP) is proposed to improve infotainment services by reducing delay and energy consumption in VANETs. The proposed technique includes two algorithms by leveraging the cross layer paradigm. Firstly, proposed EM-ARP dynamically chooses Cooperative Relay Vehicles (CRVs) based on battery power and mobility of the nodes in the direction of destination. Thus, new routing algorithm balance the high mobility, direction and energy disparity to enhance the quality of streaming and information dissemination. Secondly, a finest path between source and destination is estimated through the trust value along the path and is calculated by considering three critical factors like Link Expiration Time (LET), Hop Count and Congestion along the path. The path with highest trust value is selected for networking of multimedia data and safety information. Upon extensive simulation using Network Simulator (NS-2.34), the performance of the proposed EM-ARP is examined for energy consumption, reliability, packet delivery ratio and end-to-end delay metrics by varying the network size, vehicle speed and packet size. Simulation results exemplify that the proposed EM-ARP outperforms over existing ad-hoc routing approaches under the various performance metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Hua LC, Anisi MH, Yee L, Alam M (2017) Social networking-based cooperation mechanisms in vehicular ad-hoc network— A survey. Veh Commun 10:57–73

    Google Scholar 

  2. Regin R, Menakadevi T (2020) A novel clustering technique to stop congestion occur vehicular ad-hoc networks using node density based on received signal strength. Peer Peer Netw Appl 1–11

  3. Regin R, Menakadevi T (2019) Dynamic clustering mechanism to avoid congestion control in vehicular ad hoc networks based on node density. Wirel Pers Commun 107(4):1911–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Djahel S, Doolan R, Muntean GM, Murphy J (2014) A communications-oriented perspective on traffic management systems for smart cities: Challenges and innovative approaches. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 17(1):125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaik S, Ratnam DV, Bhandari BN (2018) An Efficient Cross layer Routing Protocol for Safety Message Dissemination in VANETs with Reduced Routing Cost and Delay using IEEE 802.11P. Wirel Pers Commun 100(4):1765–1774

  6. Little T, Agarwal A (2005) An information propagation scheme for VANETs, in: Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE pp. 155–160

  7. Tseng YC, Ni SY, Chen YS, Sheu JP (2002) The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network. Wirel Netw 8(2–3):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lipman J, Liu H, Stojmenovic I (2009) Broadcast in ad hoc networks. Guide to wireless ad hoc networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 121–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jarupan B, Ekici E (2011) A survey of cross-layer design for VANETs. Ad Hoc Netw 9(5):966–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafi S, Bhandari BN, Ratnam DV (2018) A cross layer design for efficient multimedia message dissemination with an adaptive relay nodes selection in VANETs. In 2018 Conference on Signal Processing And Communication Engineering Systems (SPACES) pp. 81–84. IEEE

  11. Huang J, Huang Y, Wang J (2014) Vehicle density based forwarding protocol for safety message broadcast in VANET. Sci World J 2014:9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palazzi CE, Roccetti M, Ferretti S (2010) An intervehicular communication architecture for safety and entertainment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 11(1):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perkins CE (2001) Ad hoc networking: an introduction, Ad hoc networking

  14. Suganthi B, Ramamoorthy P (2020) An Advanced Fitness Based Routing Protocol for Improving QoS in VANET. Wirel Pers Commun 1–23

  15. Sharma DK, Patra AN, Kumar C (2013) An update based energy-efficient reactive routing protocol for mobile Ad Hoc networks. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur (IJCNIS) 5(11):17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tekaya M, Tabbane N, Tabbane S (2010, November) Multipath routing mechanism with load balancing in ad hoc network. In Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 67–72). IEEE

  17. Camp J, Knightly E (2008) Modulation rate adaptation in urban and vehicular environments: cross-layer implementation and experimental evaluation, in: J. Sangeetha (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, ACM, pp. 315–326

  18. Chen WH, Pang AC, Hu SC, Chiang CTF (2010) Cross-layer cooperative routing for vehicular networks," in 2010 International Computer Symposium (ICS2010) pp. 67–72

  19. Yawan N, Keeratiwintakorn P (2011) December. AODV improvement for vehicular networks with cross layer technique and mobility prediction. In 2011 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems (ISPACS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE

  20. Menouar M, Lenardi M, Filali F (2005) A movement prediction based routing protocol for vehicle-to-vehicle communications. Communications

  21. Chen Y, Xiang Z, Jian W, Jiang W (2009) A Cross-layer AOMDV Routing Protocol for V2V Communication in Urban VANET, pp. 353– 359

  22. Jarupan B, Ekici E (2010) PROMPT: a cross layer position-based communication protocol for delay-aware vehicular access networks, Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier). J Special Issue Veh Netw

  23. Barghi S, Benslimane A, Assi C (2009) A lifetime-based routing protocol for connecting VANETs to the Internet, pp. 1–9

  24. Wu H, Ma H (2014) Opportunistic routing for Live Video Streaming in vehicular ad hoc networks. In IEEE 15th International Symposium on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), p. 1–3

  25. Barba CT, Mezher AM, Igartua MA, Guerin-Lassous I, Sarr C (2012) Available bandwidth-aware routing in Urban Vehicular ad-hoc networks. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), p. 1–5

  26. Sarr C, Chaudet C, Chelius G, Guerin-Lassous I (2008) Bandwidth estimation for IEEE 802.11-based ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 7(10):1228–1241

  27. Korkmaz G, Ekici E, Özgüner F, Özgüner Ü (2004) Urban multi-hop broadcast protocol for inter-vehicle communication systems, in: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 76–85

  28. Nasri A, Fathy M, Hajisheykhi R (2009) A Cross Layered Scheme for Broadcasting at Intersections in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 13–17

  29. Schmilz R, Leiggener A, Festag A, Eggert L, Effelsberg W (2006) Analysis of path characteristics and transport protocol design in vehicular ad hoc networks, in: IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2006-Spring), vol. 2

  30. Zhou L, Zheng B, Geller B, Wei A, Xu S, Li Y (2008) Cross-layer rate control, medium access control and routing design in cooperative VANET. Comput Commun 31(12):2870–2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gawas MA, Hurkat P, Goyal V, Gudino LJ (2017) Cross layer approach for efficient dissemination of emergency messages in VANETs. In 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp. 206–211. IEEE

  32. Kumar DNSR, Barani S (2020) Epidemic and transmission priority based data dissemination model in vehichular adhoc networks (VANETs). Peer Peer Netw Appl 1–13

  33. Famila S, Jawahar A, Sariga A, Shankar K (2019) Improved artificial bee colony optimization based clustering algorithm for SMART sensor environments. Peer Peer Netw Appl 1–9

  34. Nasehi H, Javan NT, Aghababa AB, Birgani YG (2013) Improving energy efficiency in manets by multi-path routing. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1303.1635

  35. Ket N, Hippargi S (2016) Modified AODV energy aware routing for optimized performance in mobile ad-hoc networks." In 2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), pp. 1030–1034. IEEE

  36. Moussaoui B, Djahel S, Smati M, Murphy J (2017) A cross layer approach for efficient multimedia data dissemination in VANETs. Veh Commun 9:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang L, El-Sayed H (2012) A novel cluster-based protocol for topology discovery in vehicular ad hoc network. Procedia Comput Sci 10:525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sirajuddin M, Rupa C, Iwendi C, Biamba C (2021) TBSMR: A Trust-Based Secure Multipath Routing Protocol for Enhancing the QoS of the Mobile Ad Hoc Network. Sec Commun Netw 2021

  39. Jensen CD, Connell PO (2006) Trust-based route selection in dynamic source routing. International Conference on Trust Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 150–163

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pushpa AM (2009) Trust based secure routing in AODV routing protocol. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Internet Multimedia Services Architecture and Applications (IMSAA), pp. 1–6. IEEE

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ECE, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Medak, Telangana, India

    Shaik Shafi

  2. Department of ECE, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, India

    D. Venkata Ratnam

Authors
  1. Shaik Shafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Venkata Ratnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafi, S., Ratnam, D.V. A trust based energy and mobility aware routing protocol to improve infotainment services in VANETs. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 15, 576–591 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01272-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01272-6

Keywords