Skip to main content
Log in

Use of standard vocabulary services in validation of water resources data described in XML

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The machine readable encoding language XML is used in water informatics to describe resources and observational data, such as the Water Data Transfer Format (WDTF). WDTF is part of an Australian initiative, established by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology in collaboration with CSIRO, to collate water resources data from multiple data providers into a national water information system. A common way of validating XML data is by defining a schema using XML Schema Definition language (XSD) and performing validation using standard XSD tools. However, XSD validation lacks the ability to perform content validation to assert context, domain and organizational rules such as soft-typing, co-constraints, and code-list or vocabulary checking, which is required in the validation of WDTF data. In this paper, we describe a validation service for validating water resources data encoded in WDTF, which combines structural and content validation. We also describe the use of a vocabulary service with the WDTF validation service to perform code-list and vocabulary checking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://validator.w3.org

  2. http://schneegans.de/sv/ and http://www.validome.org/grammar/

  3. http://gazelle.ihe.net

References

  • Bali M (2009) Drools JBoss rules 5.0 developer’s guide. Packt Publishing

  • Ball M, Boley H, Hirtle D, Mei J, Spencer B (2005) The OO jDrew reference implementation of RuleML. In: Adi A, Stoutenberg S, Tabet S (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (RuleML 2005), volume 3791 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages pp. 218–224, Galway, Ireland, November

  • BODC (2009) NERC vocabulary server. http://www.bodc.ac.uk/products/web_services/vocab/ (Accessed October 2010)

  • Boley H, Tabet S, Wagner G (2001) Design rationale of RuleML: a markup language for semantic web rules. In: Cruz IF (ed) Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford, CA, USA

  • Brickley D, Miles A (2005) SKOS core vocabulary specification 2005-11-02. W3C working draft, W3C, November. URL http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-spec-20051102/. Updated version under http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec, Accessed July 2011

  • Clark J, Murata M (2001) RELAX NG specification. OASIS Committee Specification. http://www.relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html

  • Coen CS, Marinelli P, Vitali F (2004) Schemapath, a minimal extension to xml schema for conditional constraints. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 164–174, New York, NY, USA. ACM

  • GEMET (2009) GEMET webservice API. http://svn.eionet.europa.eu/projects/Zope/wiki/GEMETWebServiceAPI

  • Githaiga J, Duclaux G, Cox S, Yu J (2010) Spatial information services stack (SISS) vocabulary service—a tool for managing earth & environmental sciences controlled vocabularies. In: eResearch Australasia

  • Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Boley H, Tabet S, Grosof B, Dean M (2004) SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, May. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL (Accessed May 2011)

  • ISO19139 (2007) Geographic information–Metadata—XML schema implementation . Norm ISO 19139

  • Jecliffe R (2002) The schematron assertion language 1.5. Academia Sinica Computing Centre. http://xml.ascc.net/resource/schematron/Schematron2000.html.

  • Kay M (2010) A streaming XSLT processor. In: Balisage: the Markup Conference, volume 5, Montreal, Canada, August

  • Kifer M (2008) Rule interchange format: The framework. In: Calvanese D, Lausen G (eds) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, volume 5341 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages pp. 1–11, Karlsruhe, Germany, October

  • Lake R, Burggraf D, Trninic M, Rae L (2004) Geography Mark-Up Language: Foundation for the Geo-Web. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0470871547

  • Mcguinness DL, van Harmelen F (2004) OWL web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation, W3C, February

  • Miles A, Bechhofer S (2008) SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference. Working draft, W3C, 2008. URL http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference. Accessed July 2011

  • Miles A, Pérez-Agüera JR (2007) Skos: simple knowledge organisation for the web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43(3):69–83. URL doi:dx.doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n03_04. Accessed July 2011

  • OGC-GeoSPARQL-SWG (2011) GeoSPARQL. http://geosparql.org (Accessed August 2011)

  • Prud’hommeaux E, Seaborne A (2007) Sparql query language for rdf (working draft). Technical report, W3C, March. URL http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/

  • Spencer B (2002) The design of j-DREW: a deductive reasoning engine for the web. In: Proceedings of the 1st CologNET Workshop on Component-Based Software Development and Implementation Technology for Computational Logic Systems, pages pp. 155–166, Madrid, Spain, September

  • W3C (2001) XML schema: Formal description, September. URL http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal

  • W3C (2008) W3C XML schema definition language (XSD) 1.1 part 1: Structures, June. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xmlschema11-1-20080620/ (Accessed October 2010)

  • W3C (2010) RIF overview, June. http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview (Accessed May 2011).

  • W3C-RDF-DAWG (2008) SPARQL query language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

  • Walker G, Taylor P, Cox S, Sheahan P (2009) Water data transfer format (WDTF): guiding principles, technical challenges and the future. In: Anderssen R, Braddock R, Newham L (eds), 18th IMACS World Congress & MODSIM 2009 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, pages pp. 4381–4387, Cairns, Qld., July

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the water information research and development alliance between CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship and the Bureau of Meteorology. The authors would like to thank the AUSCOPE team for their development and support of their vocabulary services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Yu.

Additional information

Communicated by H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J., Cox, S., Walker, G. et al. Use of standard vocabulary services in validation of water resources data described in XML. Earth Sci Inform 4, 125–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-011-0084-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-011-0084-5

Keywords

Navigation