Skip to main content
Log in

Performance testing of selected automated coastline detection techniques applied on multispectral satellite imageries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coastline detection has been of major interest for environmentalists and many methods have been introduced to detect coastline automatically. Remote Sensing techniques are the most promising ones to deliver a satisfactory result in this regard. In our study, the objective was to retrieve performance level of certain image processing techniques vigorously used for the purpose to delineate coastline automatically and they were tested against two images acquired almost on the same period by LISS III and LANDSAT ETM+ sensors. The algorithms used in the study are Water Index, NDVI, Complex Band Ratio, ISODATA, Thresholding, ISH Transfirmation techniques. Accuracy of the shoreline detection by classifying the image in land and water has been tried to be estimated in three ways, firstly with comparison to the visually interpreted high resolution google earth image, secondly field collected GCP data of reference points of classes and thirdly the raw image itself. But problem in temporal disparity caused the constraint doing accuracy assessment from the first two reference data and maps along the coast. As a whole although four techniques among six, show satisfactory results namely density slicing, ISODATA classification, Water Index and ISH transformation technique, in the case of LISS-III and ETM+, Water Index (with kappa value being 0.95 for LISS-III and 0.97 for ETM+) and Intensity-Hue-Saturation transformation techniques give better performance. Sensor to sensor variation might have introduced certain differences in shoreline detection in images of same season with similar tidal influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aedla R, Dwarakish GS et al (2015) Automatic shoreline detection and change detection analysis of Netravati-GurpurRivermouth using histogram equalization and adaptive thresholding techniques. Aquatic Procedia 4(0):563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad SR, Lakhan VC (2012) GIS-based analysis and modeling of coastline advance and retreat along the coast of Guyana. Mar Geod 35(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktaş, Ü. R., G. Can, et al. (2012). A robust approach for shoreline detection in satellite imagery. 2012 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU)

  • Alesheikh AA, Ghorbanali A et al (2007) Coastline change detection using remote sensing. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 4(1):61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony EJ (2005) Wave and tide-dominated coasts. In: Schwartz ML (ed) Encyclopedia of coastal science. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Sarkar SK (2001) Study on salt-marsh and associated meso-tidal beach faces variation from the coastal zone of eastern India. Proc. of the International Conference on Ocean Engineering COE '96 IIT Madras, India, Chennai, Allied Publishing Ltd

  • Bhattacharya AK, Sarkar SK et al (2003) An assessment of of coastal modification in the low-lying tropical coast of north East India and role of natural and artificial Forcings. International Conference on Estuaries and Coasts, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Braud J, Feng W (1998) Semiautomated construction of the Louisiana coastline digital land/water boundary using Landsat thematic mapper satellite imagery. OSRAPD Technical Report Series., Louisiana, Loiusiana Coastline Digitak Spill Research and Development Program, pp 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti P (1990) Process-response system analysis in the macrotidal estuarine and mesotidal coastal plain of eastern India. Mem Geological Survey of India 22:165–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L-Y, Chen AJ, Chen CF, Huang CM (1999) A robust system for shoreline detection and its application to coastal-zone monitoring. In 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS). AARS, Hong Kong

  • Di, K., R. Ma, et al. (2003). Coastal mapping and change detection using high-resolution IKONOS satellite imagery. Proceedings of the 2003 annual national conference on Digital government research. Boston, MA, USA, Digital Government Society of North America: 1–4

  • ESRI (2016) GIS dictionary. Retrieved 5th January, 2017, from http://support.esri.com/other-resources/gis-dictionary/term/band%20ratio

  • Foody GM (2002) The role of soft classification techniques in the refinement of stimates of ground control point location. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(9):897–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey R (1975) The realm of ichnology, its strengths and limitations. In: Frey R (ed) The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 13–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MO (2005) Wave-dominated coasts. Encyclopedia of Coastal Science. M. L. Schwartz. Dordrecht, Springer: 1054–1056

  • Higgins M (2005) Public access to the shore: public rights and private property. America’s Changing Coasts: Private Rights and Public Trust. M. W. Diana and G. R. V. UK and USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited

  • Jana A, Bhattacharya A (2013) Assessment of coastal erosion vulnerability around Midnapur-Balasore coast, eastern India using integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 41(3):675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komar PD (1976) Beach processes and sedimentation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishana GM, Mitra D et al (2005) Evaluation of semi-automated image processing techniques for the identification and delineation of coastal edge using IRS, LISS-III image - a case study on Sagar Island, East Coast of India. International Journal of Geoinformatics 1(2005)

  • Krishna GM, Mitra D et al (2005) Evaluation of semi-automated image processing techniques for the identification and delineation of coastal edge using IRS, LISS-III image - a case study on Sagar Island, East Coast of India. International Journal of Geoinformatics 1(2005)

  • Kuehl SA, Levy BM et al (1997) Subaqueous delta of the Ganges-Brahmaputra river system. Mar Geol 144(1–3):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Di K, Ma R (2001) A comparative study of shoreline mapping techniques. In: The Fourth International Symposium on Computer Mapping and GIS for Coastal Zone Managemnet. Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • Masria A, Nadaoka K et al (2015) Detection of shoreline and land cover changes around Rosetta promontory, Egypt, based on remote sensing analysis. Land 4(1):216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santra A, Mitra D et al (2011) Spatial modeling using high resolution image for future shoreline prediction along Junput coast, West Bengal, India. Geo-spatial Information Science 14(3):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekovski I, Stecchi F et al (2014) Image classification methods applied to shoreline extraction on very high-resolution multispectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 35(10):3556–3578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short AD (1983) Sediments and structures in beachnearshore environments. South E: 1st Australia. In: Mclachlan A and T Er:1Smus (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Junk, The Hague, p 145–I55

  • Tarmizi NM, Samad AM et al. (2014) Shoreline data extraction from QuickBird satellite image using semi-automatic technique. 2014 I.E. 10th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications

  • Tran Thi V, Tien Thi Xuan A et al (2014) Application of remote sensing and GIS for detection of long-term mangrove shoreline changes in Mui Ca Mau, Vietnam. Biogeosciences 11(14):3781–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umitsu M (1993) Late quaternary sedimentary environments and landforms in the Ganges Delta. Sediment Geol 83(3):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winarso G, Budhiman S (2001) The potential application of remote sensing data for coastal study. Proc. 22nd. Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Singapore. Available on: http://www.crisp.nus.edu.sg/~acrs2001

  • Wright LD, Coleman JM (1973) Variations in morphology of major deltas as function of ocean waves and river discharge regions. AAPG Bull 57

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shreyashi Santra Mitra.

Additional information

Responsible editor: H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitra, S.S., Mitra, D. & Santra, A. Performance testing of selected automated coastline detection techniques applied on multispectral satellite imageries. Earth Sci Inform 10, 321–330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0289-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0289-3

Keywords

Navigation