Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Semantic modeling of climate change impacts on the implementation of the U.N. sustainable development goals related to poverty, hunger, water, and energy

  • Research
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extreme climate events disrupt the stable, established interactions among the components of the socio-economic and environmental systems. The disruptions affect reaching the targets defined by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 6, and 7 that aim at ending poverty and hunger and ensuring access to clean water, sanitation, and affordable energy. We have semantically modeled the interactions of climate change events with the components of the food, water, and energy systems in the ‘Sustainable Development and Climate’ (SDC) ontology. The domain ontology formalizes the impacts of the events on the implementations of the actions, plans, strategies, and policies that are described by the targets of the selected goals. To ensure interoperability with other ontologies, our ontology extends classes and properties of the top-level Basic Formal Ontology, mid-level Common Core Ontologies, and other upper-level ontologies. The publicly-available SDC ontology facilitates automated discovery, management, integration, and reasoning of the indicator data of the selected goals by reusing the extensive resources of the Common Core Ontologies for data and information modeling. The SDC knowledge model allows government agencies to identify the consequences of their planned actions on people, resources, and the environment in their country, and assess the impacts of the current climate change on the successful implementation of the requirements for goals 1, 2, 6, and 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The source OWL codes are publicly and openly available for downloading at the following repository.

GitHub link: https://github.com/hbabaie1/Sustainable-Development-and-Climate-SDC-ontology.

Notes: The code for the first version of the ‘Sustainable Development and Climate ontology’ includes the developed ontology (SDC_v1.owl) and the open, imported ontologies (pato.owl and 12 CCO Turtle (.ttl) files (RDF 1.1, 2014) and their associated folders). Instructions on how to open the ontology in the Protégé ontology editor (Protégé 2022) are also given in the ‘Readme’ file that is available at the above link.

Name of code/library: SDC_v1 ontology.

Contact email and phone number: adavarpa@spelman.edu, + 1 678 294 1194.

Hardware requirement: PC or mac.

Program language: OWL (Web Ontology Language).

Software required: Protégé. Freely available (Protégé 2022).

Program size: 1.307 MB.

References

  • Anderson CC, Denich M, Warchold A, Kropp JP, Pradhan P (2022) A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustain Sci 17:1459–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AR5 (2014) Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • AR6 (2022) Sixth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Six Assessment Report. The working Group II contribution to the Six Assessment Report. 28 February 2022. Available online: www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD (2015) Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. 248 pp. MIT Press. 2015. Cambridge MA, USA

  • Baader F (2007) The Description Logic Handbook – Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2007. Edited by: Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah L. McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, and Peter F. Patel-Schneider. Cambridge University Press. New York, 602 pp

  • BFO (2022) Basic Formal Ontology. Available online: https://basic-formal-ontology.org/. Accessed June 28, 2022

  • BFO Standard (2021) ISO/IEC PRF 21838-2.2 Information technology — Top-level ontologies (TLO) — Part 2: Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html. Accessed June 10, 2022

  • BFO users (2022) Available online: https://basic-formal-ontology.org/users.html. Accessed June 27, 2022

  • Bateman JA, Hois J, Ross R, Tenbrink T (2010) A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artif. Intell. 2010. 174, 1027–1071

  • Bautista N (2019) : SDG ontology. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11106113.v1. Accessed December 28, 2022

  • Climate C (2020) Climate Change Evidence & Causes - Update 2020. An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences. Available online: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/climate-change-evidence-causes.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • Cox AP, Nebelecky CK, Rudnicki R, Tagliaferri WA, Crassidis JL, Smith B (2016) The Space Object Ontology, in: 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), IEEE, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016, pp. 146–153

  • Drawio-desktop (2022) Available online: https://github.com/jgraph/drawio-desktop/releases. Accessed on March 20, 2022

  • ENVO, Environmental Ontology (2016) 2016. The Environment Ontology < Ontology Lookup Service < EMBL-EBI

  • EPA (2021) Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States: A Focus on Six Impacts. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 430-R-21-003. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-09/climate-vulnerability_september-2021_508.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2022

  • Herre H, Heller B, Burek P, Hoehndorf R, Loebe F, Michalek H (2006) General Formal Ontology (GFO): A Foundational Ontology Integrating Objects and Processes. Part I: Basic Principles; Research Group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med): Leipzig, Germany, 2006. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/247936637_General_Formal_Ontology_GFO_-_A_Foundational_Ontology_Integrating_Objects_and_Processes_Version_10. Accessed June 10, 2022

  • Karray H, Ameri F, Hodkiewicz M, Louge T (2019) ROMAIN: Towards a BFO compliant reference ontology for industrial Maintenance. Applied Ontology, 2019. 14(2), 1–24

  • Kokla M, Guilbert E (2020) A review of geospatial semantic information modeling and elicitation approaches. ISPRS Int J. Geo-Info, 2020, 9 (146). Open access: https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/3/146. Accessed June 28, 2022

  • Merrell EC, Kelly RM, Kasmier D, Smith B, Brittain M, Ankner R, Maki E, Heisey CW, Bush K (2021) Benefits of Realist Ontologies to Systems Engineering. OntoCom 2021: 8th International Workshop on Ontologies and Conceptual Modeling, held at JOWO 2021: Episode VII. The Bolzano Summer of Knowledge, September 11–18, 2021, Bolzano, Italy

  • Masolo C, Borgo S, Gangemi A, Guarino N, Oltramari A (2003) WonderWeb Deliverable D18 Ontology Library (final); Technical report No. 2001–33052; WonderWeb Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web: 2003. Manchester, UK

  • Niles I, Pease A (2001) Towards a standard upper ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems—FOIS’01, Ogunquit, ME, USA, 17–19 October 2001; Volume 2001, pp. 2–9

  • Otte JN, Kiritsi D, Mohd Ali M, Yang R, Zhang B, Rudnicki R, Rai R, Smith B (2019) An Ontological Approach to Representing the Product Life Cycle. Applied Ontology, 14(2), 2019. 179–197

  • Partridge C, Mitchell A, Cook A, Sullivan J, West M (2020) A Survey of Top-Level Ontologies - to inform the ontological choices for a Foundation Data Model. 2020. Available online: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.58311. Accessed June 24, 2022

  • Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP (2017) A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions, Earth’s Future, 5, 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632

  • Protégé (2022) - A free, open-source ontology editor and framework for building intelligent systems. Available online: https://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed December 10, 2021

  • RDF 1.1 Turtle, Terse RDF Triple Language (2022) Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/. Accessed June 9,

  • Rudnicki R Modeling Information with the Common Core Ontologies., Inc CUBRC (2017) 2017. Available online: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2021/10/14/nist-ai-rfi-cubrc_inc_003.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • Rudnicki R, CUBRC Inc. (2019) An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies. 2019. Available online: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2021/10/14/nist-ai-rfi-cubrc_inc_004.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • PATO (2022) – The ‘Phenotype And Trait Ontology’. Available online: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pato-ontology/pato/master/pato.owl

  • Rudnicki R, Smith B, Malyuta T, Mandrick W (2016) Best practices of ontology development. White Paper. CUBRC. Retrieved March 30, 2022 from: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2021/10/14/nist-ai-rfi-cubrc_inc_002.pdf

  • RO (2008) Relation Ontology (RO). Available online: https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations. Accessed June 15, 2022

  • SDGO (2022) SDG-Ontology, SDG ontology (figshare.com). Accessed December 28, 2022

  • SDG-ontology-visualizer (2022) https://github.com/ntnu-informatikk-2021/SDG-ontology-visualizer. Accessed December 28, 2022

  • SDGIO (2015) Sustainable Development Goals Interface Ontology (SDGIO). Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/sdgio. Accessed March 12, 2022

  • Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges B, Kohler J, Kumar A, Lomax J, Mungall CJ, Neuhaus F, Rector A, Rosse C (2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 6(5):R46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Ceusters W (2010) Ontological realism: a methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Appl Ontology 5(3–4):139–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 1946, 103, No. 2684. 677–680

  • U.N. Agenda (2015) United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. Available online. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Accessed March 28, 2022

  • U.N (2022) 5Ps. U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, 5Ps. https://unsdg.un.org/latest/videos/5ps-sdgs-people-planet-prosperity-peace-and-partnership. Accessed December 26,

  • Warchold A, Pradhan P, Thapa P, Putra MPIF, Kropp JP (2022) Building a unified sustainable development goal database: why does sustainable development goal data selection matter? Sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2316

  • W3C OWL (2004) The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL). Available online: www.w3.org/OWL/. Accessed March 10, 2022

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Environmental and Health Sciences Program (EHSP) at Spelman College for administrative and technical support.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author 1 (Armita Davarpanah): Project Administration, Conceptualization, Methodology, Software development (modeling of U. N. SDGs 1, 2, 6), Formal Analysis, Original Draft Preparation.

Author 2 (Hassan Babaie): Validation, Review and Editing, Visualization (construction of figures), Software development (modeling of U.N. SDG 7, 13). Upload of software source code to the GitHub repository.

Author 3 (Nirajan Dhakal): Validation and visualization (of hydrology and availability of clean water for drinking and sanitation (modeling of U. N. SDG 6), Review and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armita Davarpanah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Background on the use of imported top- and mid-level ontologies

Appendix A: Background on the use of imported top- and mid-level ontologies

This section gives an overview of the top- and mid-level ontologies which are used in the SDC ontology, and establishes a basis for semantic modeling in general. It describes the class and property terminology that are needed to better understand the semantic jargons and discussions througout the paper. All examples given in this section are from the SDC ontology.

BFO divides reality into two disjoint categories: BFO: continuant and BFO: occurrent. Disjoint means that the intersection of these two classes is empty (i.e., is ‘nothing’), and entails that no individual can be both continuant and occurrent at the same time. Continuants are entities that persist or endure through time by maintaining their identity (e.g., Small Island Developing Country, Food Material, Ecosystem). They have parts that are also continuant. Occurrents, on the other hand, are entities that unfold in time (e.g., processes such as Flooding, Export, Use of Service, Adaptation), or they are the zero- or one-dimensional temporal regions (e.g., time of day, duration, season), or spatio-temporal regions that such entities occupy (Oxygen Minimum zone in the Upper Ocean Waters). In contrast to continuants, occurrents can only have temporal parts (e.g., the early or late part of flooding).

BFO further divides the continuant class into dependent and independent categories. An ‘independent continuant’ is an entity that does not depend on any other entity for its existence. The SDC material objects such as Fossil Fuel, Hazardous Material, Greenhouse Gas, Food, Coral Reef, and Aerosol are examples of the BFO: independent continuant. Independent continuants also include immaterial entities such as Sea Level (a two-dimensional continuant fiat boundary) and sites such as a Least-developed Country, Coastal Area, Equatorial Pacific Ocean, and Oxygen Minimum Zone.

There are two types of dependent continuants: BFO: ‘specifically dependent continuant’ and BFO: ‘generically dependent continuant’. The former class depends on the BFO: ‘independent continuant’ for its existence, and has two subclasses: BFO: quality and BFO: ‘realizable entity’. A BFO: quality is a property that inheres in an independent continuant (the bearer of the quality) and does not require any process to occur for it to be realized. For example, instances of Ice Core bear several qualities (attributes) such as Diameter, Mass, Length, and Sample Location that specifically depend on the Ice Core. Other examples include the Air Temperature and Albedo (radiation reflective quality) of Ice sheet, the Color of Coral Reef, Soil Moisture, Glacial Mass, and Land Tenure Type.

Compared to qualities which inhere in an independent entity, a BFO: realizable entity must be realized through a process in order to appear. Realizable entities include BFO: role and BFO: disposition and its BFO: function subclass. Roles are optional, meaning that the independent continuant that bears the role does not require that role, and its nature does not change if it loses the role. SDC examples of BFO: role include: Disaster Role and Hazard Role (for Flood), and Resource Role and Supply Role (for food, energy and Water). A Specimen of Ice or Specimen of Soil is a BFO: material entity (and independent continuant) that bears the Specimen Role at a specific time. The CO2 gas is a material entity that bears the Greenhouse Gas Role. The Specimen Role for Ice is realized when a scientist takes a specimen, and the Greenhouse Gas Role for CO2 is realized when the gas is released to the atmosphere through Fossil Fuel Emission, Volcanic Eruption, or other processes.

In contrast to roles that are not inherent in their bearers, dispositions depend on their bearer’s physical make-up. Examples of disposition in the SDC ontology include Decay of a Radioactive Isotope, Risk to Food Security of a Contaminant, Water Scarcity created by Global Warming, Energy Security provided by Increased Energy Production, Food Production Sustainability through Improved Food Production Management, and Energy Price Volatility as a result of Reduced Energy Production or Increased Energy Use. A function is a disposition that a natural or artifact bearer possesses, because of its physical make-up or by design, to realize a specific process. SDC examples include Ecosystem Function, Transporting Function of a Stream, Evapotranspiration Function of Plant, Fuel Function of Oil or Coal, and Cooling Function of Water.

Compared to the specifically dependent continuants that inhere in one independent continuant, the generically dependent continuants do not depend on only one bearer. For example, the data extracted from an Ice Core in a specific project, a Satellite Image taken from the Extent of Sea Ice in 2022, a plot of the Concentration of CO2 in the Atmosphere in a specific year, or an annual graph of Temperature vs. Depth in the Atlantic Ocean, can be saved in files with different formats that can be displayed on a computer screen or printed on different kinds of paper. For each of these cases, the File, Computer Screen, or the Paper is the different carrier of the same information.

The BFO: occurrent class is subsumed by BFO: process, CCO: Change, CCO: Natural Process, BFO: process profile, and CCO: Stasis that are extensively used in the SDC ontology. The CCO: Change class allows modeling changes in the climate system such as in the temperature, frequency and severity of extreme events, and in other systems such as energy and food production.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davarpanah, A., Babaie, H. & Dhakal, N. Semantic modeling of climate change impacts on the implementation of the U.N. sustainable development goals related to poverty, hunger, water, and energy. Earth Sci Inform 16, 929–943 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00941-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00941-9

Keywords

Navigation