Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of hybrid model-based deep learning and swarm‐based optimizers for flood susceptibility prediction in Binh Dinh province, Vietnam

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flooding is a serious natural hazard. It causes considerable impact on human life, the environment, and property, worldwide. Building a highly accurate flood susceptibility map can reduce disaster damage; it has become the main approach in flood risk management. The objective of this research is to build flood susceptibility maps for Binh Dinh province in Vietnam, applying modern machine learning and remote sensing methods, namely deep neural networks (DNN) and swarm-based optimization algorithms such as aquila optimizer algorithm (AO), sea lion optimization (SLnO), elephant herding optimization (EHO), the naked mole-rat algorithm (NMRA), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). The geospatial distribution analysis approach was used to construct the input data, including 1883 sample points and 12 conditioning factors. Several well-known algorithms were used as reference models to compare the accuracy of each proposed model. The statistical indices root mean square error (RMSE), area under curve (AUC), mean absolute error (MAE), accuracy, and F1 score were used to validate the proposed model. The results show that five optimization algorithms successfully in buiding flood susceptibility maps and these models performed well with an AUC value of more than 0.97. The DNN-NMRA model came first (RMSE = 0.16, AUC = 0.99), followed by DNN-SLnO (RMSE = 0.39, AUC = 0.99), DNN-EHO (RMSE = 0.41, AUC = 0.99), DNN-AO (RMSE = 0.46, AUC = 0.97), and DNN-SGD (RMSE = 0.49, AUC = 0.93) respectively. Furthermore, the results show that the precision of new models (DNN-NMRA, DNN-SlnO, DNN-EHO, DNN-AO) surpassed the standard model DNN-SGD. The results of this study are useful in the construction of appropriate flood management strategies in at-risk regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-Qaness MA, Gandomi AH (2021) Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 157:107250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfieri L, Bisselink B, Dottori F, Naumann G, de Roo A, Salamon P, Wyser K, Feyen L (2017) Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth’s Future 5:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Juaidi AE, Nassar AM, Al-Juaidi OE (2018) Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab J Geosci 11:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andaryani S, Nourani V, Haghighi AT, Keesstra S (2021) Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Environmental Management 291:112731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angadi BM, Kakkasageri MS, Manvi SS (2021) Computational intelligence techniques for localization and clustering in wireless sensor networks. Recent Trends in Computational Intelligence Enabled Research. Elsevier. pp 23–40

  • Arora A, Arabameri A, Pandey M, Siddiqui MA, Shukla UK, Bui DT, Mishra VN, Bhardwaj A (2021) Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain. India. Science of The Total Environment 750:141565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avand M, Moradi H (2021) Spatial modeling of flood probability using geo-environmental variables and machine learning models, case study: Tajan watershed. Iran Advances in Space Research 67:3169–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boithias L, Sauvage S, Lenica A, Roux H, Abbaspour KC, Larnier K, Dartus D, Sánchez-Pérez JM (2017) Simulating flash floods at hourly time-step using the SWAT model. Water 9:929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottou L (2012) Stochastic gradient descent tricks. Neural networks: Tricks of the trade. Springer. pp 421–436

  • Breiman L (2001) Random Forests Machine Learning 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubeck P, Thieken AH (2018) What helps people recover from floods? Insights from a survey among flood-affected residents in Germany. Reg Environ Change 18:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Ngo P-TT, Pham TD, Jaafari A, Minh NQ, Hoa PV, Samui P (2019) A novel hybrid approach based on a swarm intelligence optimized extreme learning machine for flash flood susceptibility mapping. CATENA 179:184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui Q-T, Nguyen Q-H, Nguyen XL, Pham VD, Nguyen HD, Pham V-M (2020) Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol 581:124379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Hoang N-D, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo P-TT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, Samui P, Costache R (2020) A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: A case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ 701:134413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hong H, Li S, Shahabi H, Wang Y, Wang X, Ahmad BB (2019) Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. J Hydrol 575:864–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou TY, Hoang TV, Fang YM, Nguyen QH, Lai TA, Pham VM, Vu VM, Bui QT (2021) Swarm-based optimizer for convolutional neural network: An application for flood susceptibility mapping. Trans GIS 25:1009–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cil AE, Yildiz K, Buldu A (2021) Detection of DDoS attacks with feed forward based deep neural network model. Expert Syst Appl 169:114520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R, Tien Bui D (2019) Spatial prediction of flood potential using new ensembles of bivariate statistics and artificial intelligence: A case study at the Putna river catchment of Romania. Sci Total Environ 691:1098–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R, Pham QB, Avand M, Linh NTT, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Lee S, Khoi DN, Nhi PTT, Dung TD (2020a) Novel hybrid models between bivariate statistics, artificial neural networks and boosting algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment. J Environ Manage 265:110485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R, Țîncu R, Elkhrachy I, Pham QB, Popa MC, Diaconu DC, Avand M, Costache I, Arabameri A, Bui DT (2020b) New neural fuzzy-based machine learning ensemble for enhancing the prediction accuracy of flood susceptibility mapping. Hydrol Sci J 65:2816–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darabi H, Haghighi AT, Rahmati O, Shahrood AJ, Rouzbeh S, Pradhan B, Bui DT (2021) A hybridized model based on neural network and swarm intelligence-grey wolf algorithm for spatial prediction of urban flood-inundation. J Hydrol 603:126854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood susceptibility prediction using four machine learning techniques and comparison of their performance at Wadi Qena Basin, Egypt. Nat Hazards 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04296-y

  • Elhosseini MA, El Sehiemy RA, Rashwan YI, Gao X (2019) On the performance improvement of elephant herding optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 166:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falah F, Rahmati O, Rostami M, Ahmadisharaf E, Daliakopoulos IN, Pourghasemi HR (2019) Artificial neural networks for flood susceptibility mapping in data-scarce urban areas. Spatial modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. pp 323–336

  • Gašparović M, Dobrinić D (2020) Comparative assessment of machine learning methods for urban vegetation mapping using multitemporal sentinel-1 imagery. Remote Sensing 12:1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geris J, Tetzlaff D, McDonnell J, Soulsby C (2015) The relative role of soil type and tree cover on water storage and transmission in northern headwater catchments. Hydrol Process 29:1844–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn EP, Morino K, Nagler PL, Murray RS, Pearlstein S, Hultine KR (2012) Roles of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated desert river. J Arid Environ 79:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammami S, Zouhri L, Souissi D, Souei A, Zghibi A, Marzougui A, Dlala M (2019) Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arab J Geosci 12:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H-G, Lee M-J (2020) A method for classifying land and ocean area by removing Sentinel-1 speckle noise. J Coastal Res 102:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam ARMT, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Kundu S, Eibek KU, Pham QB, Kuriqi A, Linh NTT (2021) Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geosci Front 12:101075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janizadeh S, Vafakhah M, Kapelan Z, Dinan NM (2021) Novel Bayesian Additive Regression Tree Methodology for Flood Susceptibility Modeling. Water Resour Manage 35:4621–4646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadam P, Sen D (2012) Flood inundation simulation in Ajoy River using MIKE-FLOOD. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 18:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš J, Benešová M, Vilímek V, Bouška P, Cochachin Rapre A (2014) The reconstruction of a glacial lake outburst flood using HEC-RAS and its significance for future hazard assessments: an example from Lake 513 in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Nat Hazards 71:1617–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Kim J-C, Jung H-S, Lee MJ, Lee S (2017) Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8:1185–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liuzzo L, Sammartano V, Freni G (2019) Comparison between different distributed methods for flood susceptibility mapping. Water Resour Manage 33:3155–3173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Li J, Zhao Y (2021) Population Forecast of China’s Rural Community Based on CFANGBM and Improved Aquila Optimizer Algorithm. Fractal and Fractional 5:190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi L, Borga M, Preciso E, Gaume E (2010) Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J Hydrol 394:118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masadeh R, Mahafzah BA, Sharieh A (2019) Sea Lion Optimization Algorithm Sea 10:388

    Google Scholar 

  • Masadeh R, Alsharman N, Sharieh A, Mahafzah B (2021) Task scheduling on cloud computing based on sea lion optimization algorithm. International Journal of Web Information Systems Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-11-2020-0071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei S, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B, Alavi SJ (2021) Flood susceptibility assessment using extreme gradient boosting (EGB). Iran Earth Science Informatics 14:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau K-w (2018) Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water 10:1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosavi A, Rabczuk T, Varkonyi-Koczy AR (2017) Reviewing the novel machine learning tools for materials design. International Conference on Global Research and Education. Springer. pp 50–58

  • Nachappa TG, Piralilou ST, Gholamnia K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Rahmati O, Blaschke T (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol 590:125275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir MJ, Iqbal J, Ahmad W (2020) Flash flood risk modeling of swat river sub-watershed: a comparative analysis of morphometric ranking approach and El-Shamy approach. Arab J Geosci 13:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PT, Ha DH, Jaafari A, Nguyen HD, Van Phong T, Al-Ansari N, Prakash I, Le HV, Pham BT (2020) Groundwater potential mapping combining artificial neural network and real AdaBoost ensemble technique: the DakNong province case-study. Vietnam Intl J Envr Res Public Health 17:2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Nguyen Q-H, Du Q, Ha Thanh N, Nguyen G, Bui Q-T (2021a) A novel combination of Deep Neural Network and Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for flood susceptibility mapping in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam. Geocarto International:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021a.1975832

  • Nguyen HD, Nguyen Q-H, Du QVV, Nguyen THT, Nguyen TG, Bui Q-T (2021b) A novel combination of Deep Neural Network and Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for flood susceptibility mapping in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam. Geocarto International:1–25.

  • Nguyen THT, Nguyen ND, Nguyen HD, Dang DK, Pham LT, Bui NT (2021c) Research on the Vulnerability of the Community to Flood: A Case Study at the Downstream of Gianh River, Quang Binh Province. VNU Journal of Science: Earth and Environmental Sciences 37.

  • Nguyen HD (2022) Hybrid models based on deep learning neural network and optimization algorithms for the spatial prediction of tropical forest fire susceptibility in NgheAn province, Vietnam. Geocarto International:1–25.

  • Nielsen MA (2015) Neural networks and deep learning. Determination press San Francisco, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova V, Zlateva P, Dimitrov I (2018) Geological–Geomorphological features of river catchments in flood susceptibility assessment (on the Example of Middle Struma Valley, Bulgaria). International Conference on Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer. pp 76–96

  • Ongdas N, Akiyanova F, Karakulov Y, Muratbayeva A, Zinabdin N (2020) Application of HEC-RAS (2D) for flood hazard maps generation for Yesil (Ishim) river in Kazakhstan. Water 12:2672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-García E, Salcedo-Sanz S, Casanova-Mateo C (2014) Accurate precipitation prediction with support vector classifiers: A study including novel predictive variables and observational data. Atmos Res 139:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J-W, Korosov AA, Babiker M, Sandven S, Won J-S (2017) Efficient thermal noise removal for Sentinel-1 TOPSAR cross-polarization channel. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 56:1555–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Jaafari A, Van Phong T, Yen HPH, Tuyen TT, Van Luong V, Nguyen HD, Van Le H, Foong LK (2021) Improved flood susceptibility mapping using a best first decision tree integrated with ensemble learning techniques. Geosci Front 12:101105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad P, Loveson VJ, Das B, Kotha M (2021) Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping. Geocarto International:1–23.

  • Prăvălie R, Costache R (2014) The potential of water erosion in Slănic River basin. Revista de Geomorfologie 16.

  • Rahman M, Ningsheng C, Islam MM, Dewan A, Iqbal J, Washakh RMA, Shufeng T (2019) Flood susceptibility assessment in Bangladesh using machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis. Earth Syst Environ 3:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Chen N, Elbeltagi A, Islam MM, Alam M, Pourghasemi HR, Tao W, Zhang J, Shufeng T, Faiz H (2021) Application of stacking hybrid machine learning algorithms in delineating multi-type flooding in Bangladesh. J Environ Manage 295:113086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2016) Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province. Iran Geocarto Int 31:42–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar S, Nejad FM, Zakeri H, Gandomi AH (2020) 3 - Computational intelligence for modeling of asphalt pavement surface distress. In: Samui P, Kim D, Iyer NR, Chaudhary S (eds) New Materials in Civil Engineering. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 79–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman S, Hasan MSU, Rai AK, Rahaman MH, Avtar R, Sajjad H (2022) Integrated approach for spatial flood susceptibility assessment in Bhagirathi sub‐basin, India using entropy information theory and geospatial technology. Risk Analysis.

  • Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:160904747.

  • Saha TK, Pal S, Talukdar S, Debanshi S, Khatun R, Singha P, Mandal I (2021) How far spatial resolution affects the ensemble machine learning based flood susceptibility prediction in data sparse region. J Environ Manage 297:113344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahana M, Patel PP (2019) A comparison of frequency ratio and fuzzy logic models for flood susceptibility assessment of the lower Kosi River Basin in India. Environ Earth Sciences 78:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgotra R, Singh U (2019) The naked mole-rat algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 31:8837–8857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann GJ-P, Moller DK (2015) Microwave remote sensing of flood inundation. Phys Chem Earth, Parts a/b/c 83:84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwerdt M, Schmidt K, Ramon NT, Alfonzo GC, Döring BJ, Zink M, Prats-Iraola P (2015) Independent verification of the Sentinel-1A system calibration. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 9:994–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A (2018) Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage 217:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ronoud S, Asadi S, Pham BT, Mansouripour F, Geertsema M, Clague JJ, Bui DT (2021) Flash flood susceptibility mapping using a novel deep learning model based on deep belief network, back propagation and genetic algorithm. Geosci Front 12:101100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Singh U, Salgotra R (2021) Effect of parametric enhancements on naked mole-rat algorithm for global optimization. Engineering with Computers:1–29.

  • Tansar H, Babur M, Karnchanapaiboon SL (2020) Flood inundation modeling and hazard assessment in Lower Ping River Basin using MIKE FLOOD. Arab J Geosci 13:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J, Laiman K, Davies M, Clifton D, Ridley I, Biddulph P (2011) Flood management: prediction of microbial contamination in large-scale floods in urban environments. Environ int 37:1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Kumar L (2018) The application of a Dempster–Shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Environ Earth Sciences 77:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol 512:332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termeh SVR, Kornejady A, Pourghasemi HR, Keesstra S (2018) Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ 615:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towfiqul Islam ARM, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Kundu S, Eibek KU, Pham QB, Kuriqi A, Linh NTT (2021) Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geoscience Frontiers 12:101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi A, Attri L, Tiwari RK (2021) Spaceborne C-band SAR remote sensing–based flood mapping and runoff estimation for 2019 flood scenario in Rupnagar, Punjab, India. Environ Monit Assess 193:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useya J, Chen S (2019) Exploring the potential of mapping cropping patterns on smallholder scale croplands using sentinel-1 SAR data. Chin Geogra Sci 29:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Honert RC, McAneney J (2011) The 2011 Brisbane floods: causes, impacts and implications. Water 3:1149–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Jia H, Abualigah L, Liu Q, Zheng R (2021) An improved hybrid aquila optimizer and harris hawks algorithm for solving industrial engineering optimization problems. Processes 9:1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G-G, Deb S, Coelho LdS (2015) Elephant herding optimization. 2015 3rd international symposium on computational and business intelligence (ISCBI). IEEE. pp 1–5

  • Wasko C, Sharma A (2017) Global assessment of flood and storm extremes with increased temperatures. Sci Rep 7:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R-M, Zhang G-L, Liu F, Lu Y-Y, Yang F, Yang F, Yang M, Zhao Y-G, Li D-C (2016) Comparison of boosted regression tree and random forest models for mapping topsoil organic carbon concentration in an alpine ecosystem. Ecol Ind 60:870–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X-S (2013) Swarm intelligence based algorithms: A critical analysis. Evolutionary Intelligence 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-013-0102-2

  • Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Peng D, Xu L (2019) Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Sci Total Environ 659:940–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Huu Duy Nguyen, Chien Pham Van, Anh Duc Do. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Huu Duy Nguyen, Chien Pham Van, Anh Duc Do. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien Pham Van.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no confict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, H.D., Van, C.P. & Do, A.D. Application of hybrid model-based deep learning and swarm‐based optimizers for flood susceptibility prediction in Binh Dinh province, Vietnam. Earth Sci Inform 16, 1173–1193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00954-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00954-4

Keywords

Navigation