Abstract
To access the closeness of DEMs topography with the real field elevation, we evaluated the vertical accuracy of eight different freely accessible DEMs across different physiographic regions and the river basins of Nepal. Results revealed that MERIT DEM (90 m resolution) with RMSE of 9 m was found to be superior to other DEMs in Nepal's low-lying Terai plains where the elevation range lies between 59 m-721 m. In High mountains (515 m-5202 m) and High Himalayas (2150 m-8749 m) with higher elevation, SRTM90m with RMSE 260 m and 323 m respectively, outperformed all its counterpart. Meanwhile, in Siwalik and the middle mountains, both SRTM90m and HYDROSHEDS exhibited almost similar RMSE of 106 m indicating their compatible uses in these regions. Meanwhile, the accuracy assessment across different river basins of Nepal discerned that the accuracy of SRTM90m was above others in larger river basins like Koshi (RMSE 224 m), Narayani (RMSE 215 m) and Karnali (RMSE 265 m) where the range of elevation is greater. In the smaller to medium-sized basins like Kankai, Kamala, Bagmati, West Rapti and Babai, HYDROSHEDS was found preferable along with SRTM90m. Based on different error statistics, the rankings are given to each DEM in order of their accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The DEMs data used in this study can be accessed publicly from their websites as mentioned in the main text. The spot elevation data is the property of the Survey department, Nepal which can be acquired upon formal request and payment of the data fee.
References
Amatulli G, McInerney D, Sethi T et al (2020) Geomorpho90m, empirical evaluation and accuracy assessment of global high-resolution geomorphometric layers. Sci Data 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0479-6
Baral TN (2006) Status of surveying and mapping in Nepal. Seventeenth United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific. United Nations Economic And Social Council, Bangkok, pp 5–65. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/RCC/docs/rccap17/crp/17th_UNRCCAP_econf.97_5_CRP10.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
Bhang KJ, Schwartz FW, Braun A (2007) Verification of the vertical error in C-band SRTM DEM using ICESat and Landsat-7, Otter Tail County, MN. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.885401
Boreggio M, Bernard M, Gregoretti C (2018) Evaluating the differences of gridding techniques for digital elevation models generation and their influence on the modeling of stony debris flows routing: A case study from rovina di cancia basin (North-eastern Italian alps). Front Earth Sci 6: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00089
Bricker SH, Yadav SK, MacDonald AM, Satyal Y, Dixit A, Bell R (2014) Groundwater resilience Nepal: preliminary findings from a case study in the Middle Hills. British Geological Survey, Nottingham, pp 67. [British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/14/069]. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509744/. Accessed 23 May 2021
Chai LT, Wong CJ, James D, et al (2022) Vertical accuracy comparison of multi-source Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1053: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1053/1/012025
Chhatkuli RR (2003) Building Spatial Database for NGII in Nepal. https://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc03/p1101.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
Chu T, Lindenschmidt K-E (2017) Comparison and Validation of Digital Elevation Models Derived from InSAR for a Flat Inland Delta in the High Latitudes of Northern Canada. Can J Remote Sens 43:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2017.1286936
Coulthard TJ, Neal JC, Bates PD et al (2013) Integrating the LISFLOOD-FP 2D hydrodynamic model with the CAESAR model: Implications for modelling landscape evolution. Earth Surf Process Landforms 38:1897–1906. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3478
Dhital MR (2015) Geology of the Nepal Himalaya. Springer International Publishing, Cham
DWRI (2019) Irrigation Master Plan. Department of Water Resources and Irrigation. https://dwri.gov.np/. Accessed 23 May 2021
Elkhrachy I (2018) Vertical accuracy assessment for SRTM and ASTER Digital Elevation Models: A case study of Najran city, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Eng J 9:1807–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.01.007
Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E et al (2007) The Need for Global Topography. Rev Geophys 45:1–43
Gesch D, Oimoen M, Danielson J, Meyer D (2016) Validation of the ASTER global digital elevation model version 3 over the Conterminous United States. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci - ISPRS Arch 41:143–148. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B4-143-2016
JAXA (2017) ALOS Global Digital Surface Model (DSM) “ALOS World 3D-30m” (AW3D30) Dataset Product Format Description Earth Observation Research Center (EORC), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/aw3d30/aw3d30v11_format_e.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
JICA (2020) the preparatory survey report for the project for the development of digital elevation model and orthophoto in the federal democratic republic of Nepal. https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12356085.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
Jing C, Shortridge A, Lin S, Wu J (2014) Comparison and validation of SRTM and ASTER GDEM for a subtropical landscape in Southeastern China. Int J Digit Earth 7:969–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2013.807307
Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A (2013) HydroSHEDS Technical Documentation Version 1.2. EOS Trans 89:26
Leister-Taylor V, Jacob P, Schrader H, Kahabka H (2020) Copernicus Digital Elevation Model Product Handbook. Tech. Rep. GEO.2018-1988-2, AIRBUS. Available at: https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/GEO1988-CopernicusDEM-RP-001_ValidationReport_I3.0.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
Ling F, Zhang QW, Wang C (2005) Comparison of SRTM data with other DEM sources in hydrological researches. Proceedings, 31st Int Symp Remote Sens Environ ISRSE 2005 Glob Monit Sustain Secur
Mahesh R, Jayadevan Sarunjith K, Rajakumari S et al (2021) Quality assessment of open sourced digital elevation models in southeast coast of India. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci 24:745–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.03.006
Mukherjee S, Joshi PK, Mukherjee S et al (2012) Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.09.004
Mukul M, Srivastava V, Mukul M (2016) Accuracy analysis of the 2014–2015 global shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) 1 arc-sec C-Band height model using international global navigation satellite system service (IGS) network. J Earth Syst Sci 125:909–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0716-8
Mukul M, Srivastava V, Jade S, Mukul M (2017) Uncertainties in the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Heights: Insights from the Indian Himalaya and Peninsula. Sci Rep 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41672
Mukul M, Mukul M (2021) Uncertainties in Digital Elevation Models from Global Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) digital topography data in the Indian subcontinent. J Earth Syst Sci 130: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01523-9
Mukul M, Srivastava V, Mukul M (2015) Analysis of the accuracy of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) height models using International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS) Network. J Earth Syst Sci 124(6):1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0597-2
Muralikrishnan S, Pillai A, Narender B et al (2013) Validation of Indian National DEM from Cartosat-1 Data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-012-0212-9
Nadi S, Shojaei D, Ghiasi Y (2020) Accuracy Assessment of DEMs in Different Topographic Complexity Based on an Optimum Number of GCP Formulation and Error Propagation Analysis. J Surv Eng 146:04019019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000296
NASA J (2013) NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 1 arc second. 2013, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003. Accessed 23 May 2021
Nikolakopoulos KG (2020) Accuracy assessment of ALOS AW3D30 DSM and comparison to ALOS PRISM DSM created with classical photogrammetric techniques. Eur J Remote Sens 53:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1774424
Pakoksung K, Takagi M (2020) Effect of DEM sources on distributed hydrological model to results of runoff and inundation area. Model Earth Syst Environ 30: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00914-7
Pakoksung K, Takagi M (2016) Digital elevation models on accuracy validation and bias correction in vertical. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0069-3
Purinton B, Bookhagen B (2017) Validation of digital elevation models (DEMs) and comparison of geomorphic metrics on the southern Central Andean Plateau. Earth Surf Dyn 5:211–237. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-211-2017
Rawat KS, Mishra AK, Sehgal VK et al (2013) Comparative evaluation of horizontal accuracy of elevations of selected ground control points from ASTER and SRTM DEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM: a case study of Shahjahanpur district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Geocarto Int 28:439–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2012.724453
Sampson CC, Smith AM, Bates PD et al (2016) Perspectives on open access high resolution digital elevation models to produce global flood hazard layers. Front Earth Sci 3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00085
Schumann GJ-P, Bates PD, Hawker L et al (2018) The Need for a High-Accuracy, Open-Access Global DEM. Front Earth Sci 6:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00225
Sharma CK (1987) River Systems of Nepal
Shrestha BB (2019) Approach for Analysis of Land-Cover Changes and Their Impact on Flooding Regime. Quaternary 2:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat2030027
SRTM (2015) The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Collection User Guide. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/179/SRTM_User_Guide_V3.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021
Takaku J, Tadono T, Tsutsui K, Ichikawa M (2016) Validation of “Aw3D” Global Dsm Generated From Alos Prism. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci III–4:25–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-4-25-2016
Talchabhadel R, Nakagawa H, Kawaike K et al (2021) Assessment of vertical accuracy of open source 30m resolution space-borne digital elevation models. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk 12:939–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1910575
Toutin T (2008) ASTER DEMs for geomatic and geoscientific applications: A review. Int J Remote Sens 29:1855–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701408477
Upreti BN (2001) The physiography and geology of Nepal and their bearing on the landslide problem. In: Landslide Hazard Mitigation in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. ICIMOD. https://doi.org/10.53055/ICIMOD.374
Wagle N, Acharya TD (2020) Past and present practices of topographic base map database update in Nepal. ISPRS Int J Geo-Information 9: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060397
Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold J (2013) ArcSWAT Interface For SWAT2012: User’s Guide. Texas Agric Exp Stn United States Dep Agric Temple, TX 464
Yamazaki D, Ikeshima D, Tawatari R et al (2017) A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations. Geophys Res Lett 44:5844–5853. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072874
Yamazaki D, Ikeshima D, Sosa J et al (2019) MERIT Hydro: A High-Resolution Global Hydrography Map Based on Latest Topography Dataset. Water Resour Res 55:5053–5073. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024873
Yan D, Wang K, Qin T et al (2019) A data set of global river networks and corresponding water resources zones divisions. Sci Data 6:219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0243
Funding
No funding has been received to conduct this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK, SA, and AG conceptualised the idea for the study topic, including the collection of the data. SK and SA performed the data analysis in GIS and python programs. SK prepared the draft version of the manuscript which was finalized with the inputs from SA and AG.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by: H. Babaie
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Karki, S., Acharya, S. & Gautam, A.R. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open access DEMs across different physiographic regions and river basins of Nepal. Earth Sci Inform 16, 3745–3764 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01114-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01114-4