Skip to main content
Log in

A novel method for estimating daily evapotranspiration based on one, two, and three-day meteorological records using the long short-term memory model combined with feedforward neural networks

  • Research
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In agricultural and hydrological applications, daily reference evapotranspiration (ET) is a key parameter. Based on one, two, and three-day antecedent meteorological parameters including average air temperature (T), sunshine hours (S), average relative humidity (RH), average wind speed (W), and reference evapotranspiration (ET), this study develops a new model framework for estimating daily ET magnitudes. The Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model was combined with the Feedforward Neural Network (FFNN) model in order to develop the hybrid approach, which was used to estimate daily ET values at two stations, Babolsar and Bandar Anzali, Iran, between 1990 and 2022. Additionally, 70% of the data in the present study were used for training purposes and 30% for testing purposes. Based on the statistical metrics, the proposed LSTM-FFNN model was benchmarked against the standalone LSTM model. Results from the comparison at Babolsar station indicated that the LSTM-FFNN model performed better than all scenarios with an error of approximately 1 millimeter per day in scenarios 12, 15, and 16. According to the standalone LSTM model, scenarios 5, 8, 11, 15, and 16 had a 1.57 mm/day error rate, and likewise, for the Bandar Anzali station, the combined LSTM-FFNN model performed the best in scenarios 14 and 15 with the lowest error rates (RMSE=0.96 mm/day), while the standalone LSTM model performed better in scenarios 15 and 16. It was found, however, that the proposed LSTM-FFNN model outperformed the standalone LSTM model at both sites. These results suggest that the proposed LSTM-FFNN model is capable of accurately estimating daily ET magnitudes, which may assist in the optimal management of water resources within agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The obtained data can be made available on request of interested parties under the condition of approval of the request by the authors of the article.

References

  • Achite M, Jehanzaib M, Sattari MT, Toubal AK, Elshaboury N, Wałęga A, Kim T-W (2022) Modern techniques to modeling reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid area based on ANN and GEP models. Water 14(8):1210

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibabaei K, Gaspar PD, Lima TM (2021) Modeling soil water content and reference evapotranspiration from climate data using deep learning method. Appl Sci 11(11):5029

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome 300(9):D05109

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayram S, Çıtakoğlu H (2023) Modeling monthly reference evapotranspiration process in Turkey: application of machine learning methods. Environ Monit Assess 195(1):67

    Google Scholar 

  • Biazar SM, Dinpashoh Y, Singh VP (2019) Sensitivity analysis of the reference crop evapotranspiration in a humid region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32517–32544

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang LL, Dwivedi R, Knowles JF, Fang YH, Niu GY, Pelletier JD, Meixner T (2018) Why do large-scale land surface models produce a low ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration? J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 123(17):9109–9130

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Sun S (2020) Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration based on limited meteorological data using deep learning and classical machine learning methods. J Hydrol 591:125286

    Google Scholar 

  • Citakoglu H (2021) Comparison of multiple learning artificial intelligence models for estimation of long-term monthly temperatures in Turkey. Arab J Geosci 14:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Citakoglu H, Cobaner M, Haktanir T, Kisi O (2014) Estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration in Turkey. Water Resour Manag 28:99–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobaner, M., Citakoğlu, H., Haktanir, T., & Kisi, O. (2017). Modifying Hargreaves–Samani equation with meteorological variables for estimation of reference evapotranspiration in Turkey. Hydrol Res, 48(2), 480-497.

  • Coşkun Ö, Citakoglu H (2023) Prediction of the standardized precipitation index based on the long short-term memory and empirical mode decomposition-extreme learning machine models: the case of Sakarya, Türkiye. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 131:103418

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraiture C, Molden D, Wichelns D (2010) Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: an overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Agric Water Manag 97(4):495–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir V, Citakoglu H (2023) Forecasting of solar radiation using different machine learning approaches. Neural Comput Applic 35(1):887–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallah-Ghalhari G, Shakeri F (2023) Assessing the consequences of climate change on potential evapotranspiration in Iran in the coming decades. Arab J Geosci 16(4):225

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira LB, da Cunha FF (2020) Multi-step ahead forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using deep learning. Comput Electron Agric 178:105728

    Google Scholar 

  • Gers FA, Schmidhuber J, Cummins F (2000) Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput 12(10):2451–2471

    Google Scholar 

  • Granata F, Di Nunno F (2021) Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks. Agric Water Manag 255:107040

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadadi F, Moazenzadeh R, Mohammadi B (2022) Estimation of actual evapotranspiration: a novel hybrid method based on remote sensing and artificial intelligence. J Hydrol 609:127774

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdy A, Ragab R, Scarascia-Mugnozza E (2003) Coping with water scarcity: water saving and increasing water productivity. Irrig Drainage: J Int Comm Irrig Drainage 52(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 120(6):1132–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmoud Al-Adhaileh M, Waselallah Alsaade F (2021) Modelling and prediction of water quality by using artificial intelligence. Sustainability 13(8):4259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Bashir RN, Rehman AU, Iqbal SI, Shahid MMA, Xu T (2022) Machine learning based prediction of reference evapotranspiration (ET 0) using IoT. IEEE Access 10:70526–70540

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain S, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Khaliq T, Hussain N, Mubeen M, Awais M (2020) Irrigation scheduling for cotton cultivation. Agronomy, Crop Protection, and Postharvest Technologies, Cotton Production and Uses, pp 59–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia W, Zhang Y, Wei Z, Zheng Z, Xie P (2023) Daily reference evapotranspiration prediction for irrigation scheduling decisions based on the hybrid PSO-LSTM model. PLoS One 18(4):e0281478

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha NL, Rajput J, Sena D, Elbeltagi A, Singh D, Mani I (2022) Evaluation of data-driven hybrid machine learning algorithms for modelling daily reference evapotranspiration. Atmosphere-Ocean 60(5):519–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Landeras G, Ortiz-Barredo A, López JJ (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (northern Spain). Agric Water Manag 95(5):553–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh B (2020) Machine learning algorithms-a review. Int J Sci Res (IJSR)[Internet] 9:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh S (2020) Using AR, MA, and ARMA time series models to improve the performance of MARS and KNN approaches in monthly precipitation modeling under limited climatic data. Water Resour Manag 34:263–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh S, Mohammadi B, Pham QB, Duan Z (2021) Development of boosted machine learning models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration and comparison with empirical approaches. Water 13(24):3489

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi B (2023) Modeling various drought time scales via a merged artificial neural network with a firefly algorithm. Hydrology 10(3):58

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H-P, Liu J, Zio E (2020) A long-term prediction approach based on long short-term memory neural networks with automatic parameter optimization by tree-structured Parzen estimator and applied to time-series data of NPP steam generators. Appl Soft Comput 89:106116

    Google Scholar 

  • Petković D, Gocic M, Trajkovic S, Shamshirband S, Motamedi S, Hashim R, Bonakdari H (2015) Determination of the most influential weather parameters on reference evapotranspiration by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Comput Electron Agric 114:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Gonzalez A (2017) Using remote sensing to estimate crop water use to improve irrigation water management. South Dakota State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy DK (2021) Long short-term memory networks to predict one-step ahead reference evapotranspiration in a subtropical climatic zone. Environ Process 8:911–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabanci D, Yurekli K, Comert MM, Kilicarslan S, Erdogan M (2023) Predicting reference evapotranspiration based on hydro-climatic variables: comparison of different machine learning models. Hydrol Sci J:1–14

  • Sun Z, Di L, Fang H (2019) Using long short-term memory recurrent neural network in land cover classification on Landsat and cropland data layer time series. Int J Remote Sens 40(2):593–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Svozil D, Kvasnicka V, Pospichal J (1997) Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 39(1):43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Taheri S, Hesamian G (2013) A generalization of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and its applications. Stat Pap 54:457–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi H, Samadianfard S, Kamran KV (2023) Investigating the roles of different extracted parameters from satellite images in improving the accuracy of daily reference evapotranspiration estimation. Appl Water Sci 13(2):59

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 106(D7):7183–7192

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd RW, Evett SR, Howell TA (2000) The Bowen ratio-energy balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated alfalfa evaluated in a semi-arid, advective environment. Agric For Meteorol 103(4):335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncuoglu E, Citakoglu H, Latifoglu L, Bayram S, Laman M, Ilkentapar M, Oner AA (2022) Comparison of neural network, Gaussian regression, support vector machine, long short-term memory, multi-gene genetic programming, and M5 trees methods for solving civil engineering problems. Appl Soft Comput 129:109623

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Huo Z, Rong Y, Wang C, Zhang C, Wang X (2023) A novel water use efficiency model based on stomata coupling crop growth and farmland water cycle processes in arid area. J Hydrol 617:128974

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanniarachchi S, Sarukkalige R (2022) A review on evapotranspiration estimation in agricultural water management: past, present, and future. Hydrology 9(7):123

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2(2):184–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaç SS, Todorovic M (2020) Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data. Agric Water Manag 228:105875

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouzou Y, Citakoglu H (2023) General and regional cross-station assessment of machine learning models for estimating reference evapotranspiration. Acta Geophysica 71(2):927–947

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; validation; visualization; writing—original draft. HT: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; visualization; writing—original draft. SS: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; supervision; validation; visualization; writing—original draft. RP: writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Samadianfard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharafi, M., Talebi, H., Samadianfard, S. et al. A novel method for estimating daily evapotranspiration based on one, two, and three-day meteorological records using the long short-term memory model combined with feedforward neural networks. Earth Sci Inform 16, 4077–4095 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01150-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01150-0

Keywords

Navigation