Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying multidisciplinary logistic techniques to improve operations productivity at a mine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

This case study uses a surface mine to investigate multidisciplinary logistics analysis methods for improving refinery operations. Existing resource scheduling, inventory forecasting, and economic production quantity procedures have not been able to identify how to improve productivity. The objective was to locate and demonstrate proven techniques from operations research (and other related disciplines) which could be applied to solve logistics problems. Historical operations data along with a new sample (n = 140) were utilized for the analysis. Preliminary parametric tests failed, but later a multiple server queue model was developed by integrating nonparametric techniques, waiting line theory, stochastic probabilities, and break-even scenario analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed, resulting in a solution to increase truck arrival rates by 10% which was projected to increase refinery utilization by 7–77%, thereby generating a potential productivity savings of $161,223.31 per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klaus P (2010) What’s interesting? Logist Res 2(3):121–122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bettonvil B, del Castillo E, Kleijnen JPC (2009) Statistical testing of optimality conditions in multiresponse simulation-based optimization. Eur J Oper Res 199(2):448–458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gamache M, Grimard R, Cohen P (2005) A shortest-path algorithm for solving the fleet management problem in underground mines. Eur J Oper Res 166(2):497–506

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Strang KD (2008) Collaborative synergy and leadership in e-business. In: Salmons J, Wilson L (eds) Handbook of research on electronic collaboration and organizational synergy. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 409–429

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benton WC, Shin H (1998) Manufacturing planning and control: the evolution of MRP and JIT integration. Eur J Oper Res 110(3):411–440

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ngai EWT, Law CCH, Wat FKT (2008) Examining the critical success factors in the adoption of enterprise resource planning. Comput Ind 59:548–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sturgul JR (1999) Discrete mine system simulation in the United States. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 13(1):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klaus P (2010) Logistics as a science of networks and flows. Logist Res 2(2):55–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran JJ et al (eds) (2011) Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science, vol 8. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–6408

  10. Otto A, Obermaier R (2009) How can supply networks increase firm value? A causal framework to structure the answer. Logist Res 1(3–4):131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ngwenyama O, Guergachi A, McLaren T (2007) Using the learing curve to maximize IT productivity: a decision analysis model for timing software upgrades. Int J Prod Econ 105(2):524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Temeng VA, Otuonye FO, Frendewey JO (1998) A nonpreemptive goal programming approach to truck dispatching in open pit mines. Mineral Resour Eng 7(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Argus (2011) Argus coal daily international. Argus Media Ltd. (Argus), London. http://www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 8 Aug 2011

  14. Strang KD (2011) Logistic planning with nonlinear goal programming models in spreadsheets. Int J Appl Logist 2(3):101–121

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shakeri S, Logendran R (2007) A mathematical programming-based scheduling framework for multitasking environments. Eur J Oper Res 176(1):193–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Stecke KE, Toczylowski E (1992) Profit-based FMS dynamic part type selection over time for mid-term production planning. Eur J Oper Res 63(1):54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Xu C (2010) Inverse optimization for linearly constrained convex separable programming problems. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendoza A, Ventura JA (2009) Estimating freight rates in inventory replenishment and supplier selection decisions. Logist Res 1(3–4):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Askin RG (2009) Project selection scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Souza MJF et al (2010) A hybrid heuristic algorithm for the open-pit-mining operational planning problem. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):1041–1051

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta A, Albright SC (1992) Steady-state approximations for a multi-echelon multi-indentured repairable-item inventory system. Eur J Oper Res 62(3):340–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeh RH (1997) Optimal inspection and replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res 96(2):248–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mati Y, Dauzère-Pérès S, Lahlou C (2011) A general approach for optimizing regular criteria in the job-shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 212(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patriksson M (2008) A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):1–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen L et al (2007) A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal. Eur J Oper Res 181(1):40–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies MN (1997) A generic model for simulating office process flows. Eur J Oper Res 99(2):267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Proth J-M, Sauer N (1998) Scheduling of piecewise constant product flows: a Petri net approach. Eur J Oper Res 106(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukunari M, Malmborg CJ (2009) A network queuing approach for evaluation of performance measures in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Azadeh A, Haghnevis M, Khodadadegan Y (2009) An improved model for production systems with mixed queuing priorities: an integrated simulation. AHP and value engineering approach. Int J Ind Syst Eng 4(5):536–553

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kleijnen JPC (1995) Verification and validation of simulation models. Eur J Oper Res 82(1):145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleijnen JPC, Sargent RG (2000) A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. Eur J Oper Res 120(1):14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Strang KD (2011) Portfolio selection methodology for a nuclear project. Project Manag J 42(2):81–93

    Google Scholar 

  33. Strang KD (2010) Radiology manufacturing projects and politics: scientist and politician normalized risk decision processes. Int J Manag Decision Making 11(3):94–106

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Strang KD, Chan CEL (2010) Simulating e-business innovation process improvement with virtual teams across Europe and Asia. Int J E-Entrepreneurship Innov 1(1):22–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dragut AB, Bertrand JWM (2008) A representation model for the solving-time distribution of a set of design tasks in new product development (NPD). Eur J Oper Res 189(3):1217–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Worthington D (2009) Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years. J Oper Res Soc 60:S83–S92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp RG, Dando MR (1979) Decision resource management and practical intervention in conflicts–a model and its implications. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mercer A (1977) An education in operational research: a personal viewpoint. Eur J Oper Res 1(6):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mangan J, Lalwani C, Gardner B (2004) Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(7):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Little JDC (2004) Models and managers: the concept of a decision calculus. Manag Sci J 50(12):1841–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ellram LM (1996) The use of the case study method in logistics research. J Bus Logist 17(2):93–138

    Google Scholar 

  42. Little JDC (1961) A proof of the queuing formula: L = AW. Oper Res 9(3):383–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Creswell JW, Tashakkori A (2007) Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(4):303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dorell O et al (2010) W.Va. mine blast disaster kills at least 25, in USA today, McLean, p1

  46. Strang KD (2009) Using recursive regression to explore nonlinear relationships and interactions: a tutorial applied to a multicultural education study. Pract Assess Res Eval 14(3):1–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Hair JF et al (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State University of New York, Plattsburgh, NY, 12901, USA

    Kenneth David Strang

  2. APPC Research, Haymarket Square, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Kenneth David Strang

Authors
  1. Kenneth David Strang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth David Strang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strang, K.D. Applying multidisciplinary logistic techniques to improve operations productivity at a mine. Logist. Res. 3, 207–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0058-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0058-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation