Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The effect of transhipment costs on the performance of intermodal line-trains

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

Intermodal line-trains with intermediate stops between start and end terminals are regularly advocated by intermodal transport researchers as a means to compete with all-road transport on small volumes and short distance markets. A prerequisite for line-trains are innovative transhipment technologies facilitating fast and efficient transhipments, which is likely to increase the terminal costs. The major implementation barrier of line-trains is the uncertainty regarding costs of these innovative terminals and their network benefits. The purpose of this article is to analyse the effect of terminal costs on the network performance of intermodal line-trains. The paper is based on a case study, which assesses the potential modal share for an intermodal line-train on a corridor in Sweden. The results confirm that in theory intermodal line-trains can provide competitive services on short and medium transport distances in case transhipment costs are kept low. Naturally, lower transhipment costs reduce the production costs, but of even greater importance is the ability to achieve higher load factors, which decreases the door-to-door transport costs per load unit. This opens business opportunities for operators and cost-saving potential for shippers in a market segment, which is dominated by road transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. FastRCargo is a project financed by the European Commission within the 6th framework programme. The project aims at developing a small-scale horizontal transshipment technology for automated transshipments of intermodal loading units below active contact lines.

References

  1. European Commission (2011) EU transport in figures: statistical pocketbook 2011. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission (2001) White paper—European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gleave SD (2009) Evaluation of the common transport policy (CTP) of the EU from 2000 to 2008 and analysis of the evolution and structure of the European transport sector in the context of the long-term development of the CTP. European Commission, Brussles

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bontekoning YM, Priemus H (2004) Breakthrough innovations in intermodal freight transport. Transp Plan Technol 27(5):335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lammgård C (2007) Environmental perspectives on marketing of freight transports—the intermodal road–rail case. Dissertation, Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg

  6. Rich J, Kveiborg O, Hansen CO (2011) On structural inelasticity of modal substitution in freight transport. J Transp Geogr 19(1):134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bärthel F, Woxenius J (2004) Developing intermodal transport for small flows over short distances. Transp Plan Technol 27(5):403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudel R (2002) Shifting the paradigm in the intermodal rail–road haul industry—a case study from Switzerland. In: Proceedings of the international congress of freight transport, automation and multimodality: organisational and technological innovations, Delft, vol 1–3, pp 1–18

  9. Rutten BJCM (1995) On medium distance intermodal rail transport: a design method for a road and rail inland terminal network and the Dutch situation of strong inland shipping and road transport modes. Dissertation, Technische Universiteit, Delft

  10. Woxenius J (2007) Generic framework for transport network designs: applications and treatment in intermodal freight transport literature. Transp Rev 27(6):733–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiegmans BW, Masurel E, Nijkamp P (1999) Intermodal freight terminals: an analysis of the terminal market. Transp Plan Technol 23(2):105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trip JJ, Bontekoning Y (2002) Integration of small freight flows in the intermodal transport system. J Transp Geogr 10(3):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bontekoning YM (2000) The importance of new-generation freight-terminals for intermodal transport. J Adv Transp 34(3):391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woxenius J, Bärthel F (2008) Intermodal road–rail transport in the European Union. In: Priemus H, Nijkamp P, Konings R (eds) The future of intermodal transport: operations, design and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gouvernal E, Daydou J (2005) Container rail freight services in north-west Europe: diversity of organizational forms in a liberalizing environment. Transp Rev 25(5):557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woodburn A (2009) An assessment of the operational factors affecting rail freight sustainability in Britain. In: Paper presented at the 14th annual logistics research network conference, Cardiff University, 9–11 September

  17. Trip JJ, Kreutzberger E (2002) Complex bundling networks and new generation terminals: a synthesis. TRAIL reports in transportation planning. The Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft

  18. Bontekoning YM (2002) Towards new-generation terminal operations; identifying implementation obstacles. TRAIL reports in transportation planning. The Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft

  19. Flodén J (2007) Modelling intermodal freight transport—the potential of combined transport in Sweden. Dissertation, Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg

  20. Ballis A, Golias J (2004) Towards the improvement of a combined transport chain performance. Eur J Oper Res 152(2):420–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Woxenius J (2007) Alternative transport network design and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies. Eur Transp Int J Transp Econ Eng Law (35):27–45

  22. Woxenius J (1998) Development of small-scale intermodal freight transportation in a systems context. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  23. Rudel R (2002) Shifting the paradigm in the intermodal rail-road haul industry—a case study from Switzerland. In: Paper presented at the international congress on freight transport, automation and multimodality: organisational and technological innovations, Delft, 23–24 May

  24. Woxenius J, Andersson E, Bärthel F, Troche G, Sommar R, Trouvé J (2004) A Swedish intermodal transport service based on line-trains serving freight forwarders. In: Paper presented at the 10th WCTR ‘04, Istanbul, 4–8 July

  25. Arend-Heidbrinck T (2006) Short and medium distance intermodal transport with Cargo Domino. In: Paper presented at the PROMIT workshop, Basel, 13th November

  26. FastRCargo (2006) Fast transhipment equipment and novel methods for rail cargo in Europe. Annex 1—“description of work”

  27. Tsamboulas D, Vrenken H, Lekka A-M (2007) Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 41(8):715–733

    Google Scholar 

  28. FastRCargo (2008) Deliverable D3: technology framework and equipment modularity report. CargoTechnologies, ÖBB Infrastruktur AG, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  29. SIKA (2005) Kalkylvärden och kalkylmetoder (ASEK)—En sammanfattning av Verksgruppens rekommendationer 2005, vol 16. Statens Institut för Kommunikationsanalys, Stockholm

  30. Bergqvist R (2007) Studies in regional logistics—the context of public–private collaboration and road-rail intermodality. Dissertation, Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg

  31. Lindholm M, Behrends S (2010) A holistic approach to challenges in urban freight transport planning. In: The 12th world conference on transport research society, Lisbon, 11–15 July 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is financed by the FastRCargo project within the 6th framework programme of the European Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Logistics and Transportation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Sönke Behrends

  2. Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, Logistics and Transport Research Group, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Jonas Flodén

Authors
  1. Sönke Behrends
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonas Flodén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sönke Behrends.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behrends, S., Flodén, J. The effect of transhipment costs on the performance of intermodal line-trains. Logist. Res. 4, 127–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0066-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0066-0

Keywords