Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficient waste management in construction logistics: a refurbishment case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

Large-scaled construction projects with their complex logistical processes of transport, handling and storage material to site, on site and from site bear significant environmental impacts. Such impacts include use of land, production of waste and emissions. In this paper, we investigate—by using a case study approach—how a well-planed implemented material management can affect efficiency in construction logistics focusing on logistics of disposal. The motivation behind this research is to examine the ecological and economic impact of construction logistics on waste management on site, when construction logistics is planned and determined in the early planning phase of a refurbishment project. We find that the implementation of a waste management plan can reduce environmental impacts, specifically increasing the efficiency of logistics of disposal by approximately 9 %, but it is associated with higher costs. The findings gained from this single case study research lead to case-study-specific recommendations for practitioners and regulators in the construction logistics area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baxter P, Jack S (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 13(4):544–559

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boenert L, Blömeke M (2003) Logistics concepts in the prefabricated construction industry for increasing cost leadership (Logistikkonzepte im Schlüsselfertigbau zur Erhöhung der Kostenführerschaft). Bauingenieur 78:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruns K (1997) Analysis and evaluation of reverse logistics systems—economic, ecological and social aspects (Analyse und Beurteilung von Entsorgungslogistiksystemen—Ökonomische, Ökologische und gesellschaftliche Aspekte). Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden

  4. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (2012) Gold. Silver. Bronze. The assessment. http://www.dgnb-system.de/dgnb-system/en/system/gold-silver-bronze/. Accessed 29 Dec 2012

  5. Dörmann JW (2012) Construction logistics—transparent communication as a means to success (Baulogistik—transparente Kommunikation als Mittel zum Erfolg). UnternehmerBrief Bauwirtschaft 11:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ebel G (2012) Process model for the requirements analysis in construction logistics (Vorgehensmodell für die Anforderungsanalyse in der Baulogistik). Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund

  7. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellram L (1996) The use of the case study method in logistics research. J Bus Logist 17(2):93–138

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasenclever T et al (2011) Logistics Management in the construction industry (Logistikmanagement in der Bauwirtschaft). In: Günther W, Borrmann A (eds) Digitale Baustelle—innovativer Planen, effizienter Ausführen, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–287. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16486-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemer J, Kimpeler S, Lindner T (2007) IT-base eco-efficient potentials on the example of the location of Baden-Württemberg. FAZIT-Schriftenreihe, Band 9. http://www.fazit-forschung.de/fileadmin/_fazit-forschung/downloads/FAZIT_Schriftenreihe_Band_9.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2012

  11. Huppes G, Ishikawa M (2005) Why Eco-efficiency? J Ind Ecol 9(4):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim I, Min H (2012) Green supply chain research: past, present, and future. Logist Res 4(1–2):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krauß S (2005) Construction logistics in the turnkey construction (Die Baulogistik in der schlüsselfertigen Ausführung). Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart

  14. Krauß S (2006) Organizational models for construction logistics in Germany (Organisationsmodelle für die Baulogistik in Deutschland). In: Clausen U (ed) Baulogistik—Konzepte für eine bessere Ver-und Entsorgung im Bauwesen, 1st edn. Praxiswissen Service, Dortmund, pp 17–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lipsmeier K (2004) Waste figures for new construction of high-rise buildings—structural design and construction projects in building construction according to waste management aspects (Abfallkennzahlen für Neubauleistungen im Hochbau—Hochbaukonstruktionen und Neubauvorhaben im Hochbau nach abfallwirtschaftlichen Gesichtspunkten). Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden

  16. Lipsmeier K, Ghabel M (1999) Waste management systems in the construction management practice—the recycling-oriented construction site for high-rise buildings (Abfallmanagementsysteme in der baubetrieblichen Praxis—Der recyclingorientierte Baustellenbetrieb für den Hochbau). Bautechnik 76(5):362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meredith J (1998) Building operations management theory through case and field research. J Oper Manag 16:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. del Río Merino M, Izquierdo Gracia P, Weis Azevedo IS (2010) Sustainable construction: construction and demolition waste reconsidered. Waste Manag Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09103841

  19. Müller K, Sturm A (2001) Standardized eco-efficiency indicators. http://www.ellipson.com/files/studies/EcoEfficiency_Indicators_e.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2012

  20. Pfohl H-C (2000) Logistics systems. Business fundamentals (Logistiksysteme. Betriebswirtschaftliche Grundlagen). Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pfohl H-C, Engelke M (1995) Instrumental approaches to environmental and economic assessment of disposal logistics processes (Instrumentelle Ansätze einer ökologischen und ökonomischen Beurteilung entsorgungslogistischer Prozesse). In: Pfohl H-C (ed) Arbeitspapiere zur Logistik (19). Technische Universität Darmstadt Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Darmstadt

  22. Schach R, Schubert N (2009) Logistics in construction industry (Logistik im Bauwesen). Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der TU Dresden 58(1–2):59–63

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt N (2003) Competitive factor construction logistics, new value-added potentials in the materials supply chain (Wettbewerbsfaktor Baulogistik Neue Wertschöpfungspotenziale in der Baustoffversorgung). Deutscher Verkehrs-Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen LY, Wu YZ, Chan EHW, Hao JL (2005) Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 6A(4):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Green Building Council (2012) LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) http://new.usgbc.org/. Accessed 29 Dec 2012

  26. Weber J (2007) Simulation of logistic processes at construction sites based on 3D CAD data (Simulation von Logistikprozessen auf Baustellen auf Basis von 3D-CAD Daten). Dissertation, Universität Dortmund

  27. Wildemann H (2000) Logistics of disposal (Entsorgungslogistik). In: Bilitewski et al (eds) Müllhandbuch, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, 1580-Band 2, Lfg. 4/00

  28. Yin RK (2008) Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmermann J, Haas BH (2009) Construction logistics: motivation-definition-conceptualisation (Baulogistik: Motivation-Definition-Konzeptentwicklung). Tiefbau 1:11–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the European Project ZeroWIN that is grant funded by the European Commission Framework Programme 7 for funding part of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Tischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tischer, A., Besiou, M. & Graubner, CA. Efficient waste management in construction logistics: a refurbishment case study. Logist. Res. 6, 159–171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0105-5

Keywords

Navigation