Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Examining logistics outsourcing practices in the United States: from the perspectives of third-party logistics service users

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

Ongoing global recession forced many firms to change the direction of their business strategic thinking. This change in a strategic thinking includes the reassessment of current business practices that may not necessarily add the highest value to the supply chain process and may not bring the highest possible return from the allocated resources. As such, outsourcing strategy that allows the firm to focus on its core competency has gained popularity over the years. One of the supply chain activities that are often outsourced is logistics as evidenced by a continued growth of the third-party logistics (3PL) industry across the world. To help firms formulate wise logistics outsourcing strategy, this paper examines the common logistics outsourcing practices among the US firms and identifies key determinants influencing their logistics outsourcing decisions. It also explores the current logistics outsourcing trends in terms of customer value propositions. Examples of such trends that this study discovered were the increased outsourcing of global logistics practices and a short-term duration of the logistics outsourcing contracts. Furthermore, this paper identifies the best-in class 3PLs based on their users’ experiences with those 3PLs as guidance for future benchmarking efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghazadeh SM (2003) How to choose an effective third party logistics provider? Manag Res News 26(7):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguezzol A (2007) The third party logistics selection: a review of literature. In: Proceedings of international logistics and supply chain congress, November 8–9. Istanbul, Turkey, pp 1–7

  3. Aktas A, Ulengin F (2005) Outsourcing logistics activities in Turkey. J Enterp Inf Manag 18(3):316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alibaba.com (2010) Logistics outsourcing has become the general trend of economic globalization. http://resources.alibaba.com/topic/800029260/Logistics_outsourcing_has_become_the_general_trend_of_economic_globalization.htm. Retrieved on March 27, 2011

  5. Ansari A, Modarress B (2010) Challenges of outsourcing logistics to third-party providers. Int J Logist Syst Manag 7(2):198–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arroyo P, Gaytan J, de Boer L (2006) A survey of third-party logistics in Mexico and a comparison with reports on Europe and USA. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(6):639–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bardi EJ, Tracey M (1991) Transportation outsourcing: a survey of US practices. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 21(3):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bask AH (2001) Relationships between 3PL providers and members of supply chains—a strategic perspective. J Bus Ind Mark 16(6):470–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behrens JT, Yu CH (2003) Handbook of psychology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatnagar R, Viswanathan S (2000) Re-engineering global supply chains: alliances between manufacturing and global logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 30(1):13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatnagar R, Sohal A, Millen RA (1999) Third party logistics services: a Singapore perspective. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 29(9):569–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bosstorff P, Rosenbaum RG (2007) Supply chain excellence: a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model. AMACOM, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dapiran P, Lieb RC, Millen R, Sohal A (1996) Third party logistics services usage by large Australian firms. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 26(10):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckler J (2010) Why we need to re-invent logistics outsourcing. Wareh Forum 25(11):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eyefortransport and MercuryGate International (2011) Global 3PL and outsourcing logistics strategy. Presented at the 3PL summit and chief supply chain officer forum. Atlanta, GA, June 21–23

  16. George D, Mallery P (2001) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 3rd edn. Ally and Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greer TV, Chuchinprakarn V, Seshardri S (2000) Likelihood of participating in mail survey research. Ind Mark Manage 29(2):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harden C (2011) Readers’ choice: Top 10 3PL excellence awards 2011. Inbound Logistics. http://www.inboundlogistics.com/cms/article/readers-choice-top-10-3pl-excellence-awards-2011/. Retrieved on July 26, 2011

  19. Halldórsson Á, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2004) Developing logistics competencies through third party logistics relationships. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(2):192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong J, Chin A, Lin B (2004) Logistics outsourcing by manufacturers in China: a survey of the industry. Transp J 43(1):17–25

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hong J, Chin A, Liu B (2004) Firm-specific characteristics and logistics outsourcing by Chinese manufacturers. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 16(3):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaarfar HS, Rafiq M (2005) Logistics outsourcing practices in the UK: a survey. Int J Logist Res Appl 8(4):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansson J, Mattsson LG (1986) Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach. Int Stud Manag Organ 1(17):34–48

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JI (1996) Logistics in Korea: current state and future directions. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 26(10):6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knemeyer AM, Corsi TM, Murphy PR (2003) Logistics outsourcing relationships: customer perspectives. J Bus Logist 24(1):77–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR (2004) Evaluating the performance of third-party logistics arrangements: a relationship marketing perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 40(1):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR (2005) Exploring the potential impact of relationship characteristics and customer attributes on the outcomes of third-party logistics arrangements. Transp J 44(1):5–19

    Google Scholar 

  28. Langley CJ Jr, Capgemini (2011) 15th Annual 2011 third-party logistics survey. Unpublished white paper. Capgemini Consulting, Atlanta, GA

  29. Langley CJ Jr, Capgemini (2012) 16th Annual 2012 third-party logistics survey. Unpublished white paper. Capgemini Consulting, Atlanta, GA

  30. Larson PD, Gammelgaard B (2001) Logistics in Denmark: a survey of the industry. Int J Logist Res Appl 4(2):191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Larson PD, Poist RF (2004) Improving response rates to mail surveys: a research note. Transp J 43(4):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lieb RC, Bentz BA (2004) The use of third-party logistics services by large manufacturers: the 2003 survey. Transp J 43(3):24–33

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lieb RC, Bentz BA (2005) The use of third-party logistics services by large manufacturers: the 2004 survey. Transp J 44(2):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lieb RC, Kendrick S (2002) The use of third party logistics services by large American manufacturers: the 2002 survey. Supply Chain Forum An Int J 3(2):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lieb RC, Kendrick S (2003) The year 2002 survey: CEO perspectives on the current status and future prospects of the third-party logistics industry in the United States. Transp J 42(3):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lieb RC, Kopczak L (1997) A CEO perspective: the state of US logistics companies in Europe. Supply Chain Manag Rev 1(2):34

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lieb RC, Millen RA, Van Wassenhove LN (1993) Third party logistics services: a comparison of experienced American and European manufacturers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 23(6):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lieb RC, Miller J (2002) The use of third-party logistics services by large American manufacturers, the 2000 survey. Int J Logist Res Appl 5(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lieb RC, Randall HL (1992) The use of third-party logistics services by large American manufacturers. J Bus Logist 13(2):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lieb RC, Randall HL (1996) A comparison of the use of third-party logistics services by large American manufacturers, 1991, 1994, and 1995. J Bus Logist 17(1):305–320

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lieb RC, Randall HL (1999) 1997 CEO perspectives on the current and future prospects of the 3PL industry in the US. Transp J 38(3):28–41

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lynch CF (2000) Logistics outsourcing: a management guide. Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maltz AB, Ellram LM (2000) Selling inbound logistics services: understanding the buyer’s perspective. J Bus Logist 21(2):69–88

    Google Scholar 

  44. Malhotra MJ, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16(4):407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marasco A (2008) Third-party logistics: a literature review. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McGinnis MA, Kochunny CM, Ackerman KB (1995) Third party logistics choice. Int J Logist Manag 6(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Menon MK, McGinnis MA, Ackerman KB (1998) Selection criteria for providers of third-party logistics services: an exploratory study. J Bus Logist 19(1):121–137

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mentzer JT, Gandhi N (1995) Microcomputers versus mainframes: use among logistics and marketing professionals. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 25(4):80–92

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mentzer JT, Schuster CP, Roberts DJ (1990) Microcomputer versu mainframe usage in logistics. Logist Transp Rev 26(2):115–131

    Google Scholar 

  50. Min H (2002) Outsourcing freight bill auditing and payment services. Int J Logist Res Appl 5(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Min H, Lambert T (2002) Truck driver shortage revisited. Transp J 42(2):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  52. Min H, Joo SJ (2006) Benchmarking the operational efficiency of major third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis. Supply Chain Manag Int J 11(3):259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Min H (2006) Developing the profiles of supermarket customers through data mining. Serv Ind J 26(7):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Min H, Joo SJ (2009) Benchmarking third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis: an update. Benchmarking Int J 16(5):572–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Min H, DeMond S, Joo S (2013) Evaluating the comparative managerial efficiency of leading third-party logistics providers in North America. Benchmarking Int J 20(2):212–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mollenkopf D, Dapiran GP (2005) World-class logistics: Australia and New Zealand. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(1):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Murphy PR, Daley JM (1994) A comparative analysis of port selection factors. Transp J 34(11):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  58. Murphy PR, Poist RE (1998) Third-party logistics usage: an assessment of propositions based on previous research. Transp J 27(4):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap, Harvard, Cambridge

  60. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sankaran J, Mun D, Charman Z (2002) Effective logistics outsourcing in New Zealand: an inductive empirical investigation. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 32(8):682–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Payne A, Frow P (2006) A strategic framework for customer relationship management. J Mark 69(4):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Pedersen EL, Gray R (1998) The transport selection criteria of Norwegian exporters. Int J Phy Distrib Logist Manag, 28(2):108–120

    Google Scholar 

  64. Razzaque MA, Sheng CC (1998) Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 28(2):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sahay BS, Mohan R (2006) Managing 3PL relationships. Int J Integr Supply Manag 2(½):69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sanders NR, Locke A (2005) Making sense of outsourcing. Supply Chain Manag Rev 9(2):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  67. Selviaridis K, Spring M (2007) Third party logistics: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Logist Manag 18(1):125–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Skjoett-Larsen T (2000) Third party logistics—from an interorganizational point of view. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 30(2):112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sheffi Y (1990) Third party logistics: present and future prospects. J Bus Logist 11(2):27–39

    Google Scholar 

  70. Singh A, Narain R, Yadav RC (2006) Benchmarking and performance measurement of supply chain management practices: a survey of Indian organizations. Int J Serv Oper Manag 2(4):313–334

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sink HL, Langley CJ, Gibson BJ (1996) Buyer observations of the US third-party logistics market. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 26(3):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sohail MS, Al-Abdali OS (2005) The usage of third party logistics in Saudi Arabia: current position and future prospects. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(9/10):637–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sohail MS, Anwar SA, Chowdhury J, Farhat NR (2005) Logistics outsourcing in the United Arab Emirates: evidence and managerial implications. J Mark Channels 13(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sohail M, Sadiq A, Nathan K, Rushdi M (2004) The use of third-party logistics services: evidence from a Sub-Sahara African nation. Int J Logist Res Appl 7(1):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. SPSS (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics 21 edition. SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  76. Stank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK, Savitskie K (2003) Logistics service performance: estimating its influence on market share. J Bus Logist 24(1):27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sweeny E (2003) Purchasing logistics services: guidelines on selecting and managing the right 3PL. Logist Solut 6(5):34

    Google Scholar 

  78. The Outsourcing Institute Membership Database (1998) Survey of current and potential outsourcing end-user. http://www.outsourcing.com/content.asp?page=01b/articles/intelligence/oi_top_ten_survey.html. Retrieved on September 9, 2010

  79. van Laarhoven P, Berglund M, Peters M (2000) Third-party logistics in Europe—five years later. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 30(5):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wagner SM, Kemmerling R (2010) Handling nonresponse in logistics research. J Bus Logist 31(2):357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wood DF, Nelson RS (1999) Industrial transportation management: What’s new? Transp J 39(9):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

  85. Yu J, Cooper H (1983) A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. J Mark Res 20(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhou G, Min H, Xu C, Cao Z (2008) Evaluating the comparative efficiency of Chinese third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(4):262–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. James R. Good Chair in Global Supply Chain Strategy, Department of Management, BAA 3008C, College of Business Administration, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA

    Hokey Min

Authors
  1. Hokey Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hokey Min.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Min, H. Examining logistics outsourcing practices in the United States: from the perspectives of third-party logistics service users. Logist. Res. 6, 133–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0110-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0110-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation