Abstract
Pen input provides intuitive and natural computer interaction for tasks such as annotating documents and sketching. However interfaces that use a pen alone can be slow and inefficient. Thus most pen interfaces also support keyboard and mouse input. Multi-modal input exponentially increases the complexity of the design and usability of these systems. Here we describe our usability testing experiences of four different pen-dominant software tools. One is designed for a digital whiteboard, two for a Tablet PC and the last for a Tablet PC coupled to a haptic pen. Our experiences suggest that pen only input is difficult to achieve with a standard operating system because the pen is appreciably overloaded. However, in situations where a keyboard and mouse is convenient, users tolerate the inefficient of pen interaction in exchange for convenience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jarrett R, Su P (2003) Building tablet PC applications. Microsoft, Redmond
Apperley M, Dahlberg B, Jefferies A, Paine L, Phillips M, Rogers B (2001) Lightweight capture of presentations for review. In: IHM-HCI. ACM, New York, pp 41–42
Mimio (2001) Mimio. http://www.virtualink.com. Retrieved 12 June 2001
Plimmer BE (2004) Using shared displays to support group design; a study of the use of informal user interface designs when learning to program. PhD thesis, Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton
Plimmer B, Apperley M (2003) Evaluating a sketch environment for novice programmers. In: CHI ’03: CHI ’03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1018–1019
Plimmer BE, Apperley M (2003) Freeform: a tool for sketching form designs. In: BHCI, vol 2, pp 183–186,
Plimmer BE, Apperley M (2003) Software for students to sketch interface designs. In: Rauterberg M, Menozzi M, Wesson J (eds) Interact, pp 73–80
Plimmer B, Apperley M (2004) Interacting with sketched interface designs: an evaluation study. In: CHI ’04: CHI ’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1337–1340
Chung R, Mirica P, Plimmer B (2005) Inkkit: a generic design tool for the tablet PC. In: CHINZ ’05: proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction. ACM, New York, pp 29–30
Freeman IJ, Plimmer B (2007) Connector semantics for sketched diagram recognition. In: AUIC ’07: proceedings of the eight Australasian conference on user interface. Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, pp 71–78
Plimmer B, Freeman I (2007) A toolkit approach to sketched diagram recognition. In: HCI, vol 1, pp 205–213, eWiC
Plimmer B, Tang G, Young M (2006) Sketch tool usability: Allowing the user to disengage. In: HCI. ACM, New York, pp 164–167
Patel R, Plimmer B, Grundy J, Ihaka R (2007) Ink features for diagram recognition. In: 4th Eurographics workshop on sketch-based interfaces and modeling. Eurographics
Mason P, Plimmer B (2005) A critical comparison of usability testing methodologies. In: Mann S (ed) NACCQ (Tauranga), pp 255–258
Plimmer B, Mason P (2004) Designing an environment for annotating and grading student assignments. In: OZCHI, pp 45–53
Plimmer B, Mason P (2006) A pen-based paperless environment for annotating and marking student assignments. In: Piekarski W (ed) AUIC, vol 50. CRPIT, pp 27–34
Plimmer B, Crossan A, Brewster S (2006) Computer supported non-visual signature training. In: McGookin. D, Brewster, S (eds) First international workshop on haptic and audio interaction design, vol 2, pp 1–4
Sensible technologies. http://www.sensable.com/haptic-phantom-omni.htm. Retrieved 8 June 2007
Crossan A, Brewster S (2007) Multimodal trajectory playback for teaching shape information and trajectories to visually impaired computer users. In: ACM transactions on accessible computing
Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
Robins A, Rountree J, Rountree N (2003) Learning and teaching programming: a review and discussion. Comput Sci Educ 13:137–172
Plimmer B, Crossan A, Brewster S, Patel R (2008) Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people. In: Chi2008. ACM, New York
Rubine D (1991) Specifying gestures by example. In: SIGGRAPH ’91: proceedings of the 18th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, New York, pp 329–337
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plimmer, B. Experiences with digital pen, keyboard and mouse usability. J Multimodal User Interfaces 2, 13–23 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-008-0002-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-008-0002-4