Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time emergency response: improved management of real-time information during crisis situations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decision-making process during crisis and emergency scenarios intertwines human intelligence with infocommunications. In such scenarios, the tasks of data acquisition, manipulation, and analysis involve a combination of cognitive processes and information and communications technologies, all of which are vital to effective situational awareness and response capability. To support such capabilities, we describe our real time emergency response (rtER) system, implemented with the intention of helping to manage the potential torrents of data that are available during a crisis, and that could easily overwhelm human cognitive capacity in the absence of technological mediation. Specifically, rtER seeks to address the research challenges surrounding the real-time collection of relevant data, especially live video, making this information rapidly available to a team of humans, and giving them the tools to manipulate, tag, and filter the most critical information of relevance to the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Adobe Flash player may be the exception, which supports latencies under 3 s with careful parameter tuning.

  2. A demonstration video of the prototype is available from http://srl.cim.mcgill.ca/rter.

  3. As an example, see http://www.ted.com/talks/blaise_aguera.html.

References

  1. Adobe (2010) HTTP dynamic streaming on the Adobe Flash platform. www.adobe.com/products/httpdynamicstreaming/pdfs/httpdynamicstreaming_wp_ue.pdf

  2. Arkles D (2010) Essential viewing. Fire risk managem- ent. www.momentumgroup.com.au/Fire%20Focus%20Research-Essential%20%Viewing-Nov2010.pdf

  3. Banks K, Hersman E (2009) FrontlineSMS and Ushahidi-a demo. In: Information and communication technologies and development, 2009 International Conference on, p 484. doi:10.1109/ICTD.2009.5426725

  4. Banzato A, Barbini F, D’Atri A, D’Atri E, Za S (2010) Social networks and information systems to handle emergency and reconstruction in natural disasters: the L’Aquila earthquake case study. In: ALPIS. Sprouts: working papers on information systems, vol. 10, Sprouts Alliance

  5. Baranyi P, Csapó A (2012) Definition and synergies of cognitive infocommunications. Acta Polytech Hung 9(1):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bigham JP, Jayant C, Ji H, Little G, Miller A, Miller RC, Miller R, Tatarowicz A, White B, White S, Yeh T (2010) VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In: Proceedings of the UIST, ACM Press, New York pp. 333–342

  7. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV (2012) Wireless substitution: early release of estimates from the national health interview survey, January–June 2012. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201212.PDF

  8. Careem M, De Silva C, De Silva R, Raschid L, Weerawarana S (2006) Sahana: overview of a disaster management system. In: International Conference on Information and Automation, pp. 361–366. doi:10.1109/ICINFA.2006.374152

  9. Catarci T, de Leoni M, Marrella A, Mecella M, Bortenschlager Manfredand Steinmann R (2010) The WORKPAD project experience: improving the disaster response through process management and geo collaboration. In: French S, Tomaszewski B, Zobel C (eds) 7th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management (ISCRAM)

  10. Catarci T, de Leoni M, Marrella A, Mecella M, Salvatore B, Vetere G, Dustdar S, Juszczyk L, Manzoor A, Truong H (2008) Pervasive software environments for supporting disaster responses. IEEE Internet Comput 12(1):26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Cicco L, Mascolo S (2010) An experimental investigation of the Akamai adaptive video streaming. In: Proceedings of the USAB’10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on HCI in work and learning, life and leisure: workgroup human-computer interaction and usability engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 447–464. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1947789.1947828

  12. Dong A, Zhang R, Kolari P, Bai J, Diaz F, Chang Y, Zheng Z, Zha H (2010) Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using twitter data. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW ’10, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 331–340. doi:10.1145/1772690.1772725

  13. Dugdale J, Van de Walle B, Koeppinghoff C (2012) Social media and sms in the haiti earthquake. In: World wide web companion, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 713–714. doi:10.1145/2187980.2188189

  14. Fajardo JTB, Oppus CM (2010) A mobile disaster management system using the android technology. WSEAS Trans Commun 9(6):343–353

    Google Scholar 

  15. Federal Communications Commmission (2013) Fcc proposes action to spur wireless network reliability improvements. www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-action-spur-wireless-networ%k-reliability-improvements

  16. Gao H, Barbier G, Goolsby R (2011) Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. Intell Syst IEEE 26(3):10–14. doi:10.1109/MIS.2011.52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geron T (2012) Kevin systrom: 800,000 #sandy instagram pho- tos bring data into focus. www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2012/ 11/05/kevin-systrom-8000%0-sandy-instagram-photos-bring-data-into-focus

  18. Gupta A, Lamba H, Kumaraguru P, Joshi A (2013) Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy. In: World wide web companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 729–736. url:http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2487788.2488033

  19. Guskin E, Hitlin P (2012) Hurricane sandy and twitter. www.journalism.org/2012/11/06/hurricane-sandy-and-twitter

  20. Hammouda H (2013) Eyewitness. www.ecuad.ca/people/work/298078

  21. Hughes AL, Palen L, Sutton J, Liu SB, Vieweg S (2008) Site-seeing in disaster: an examination of on-line social convergence. In: Fiedrich F, Van de Walle B (eds) 5th international ISCRAM conference, Washington, DC

  22. ISO/IEC (2012) Information technology—dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Part 1: media presentation description and segment formats

  23. ITU-T and ISO/IEC JTC 1 (2013) Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services, ITU-T Recommendation H.264

  24. Kazansky B (2012) In red hook, mesh network connects sandy survivors still without power. www.techpresident.com/news/23127/red-hook-mesh-network-connects-s%andy-survivors-still-without-power

  25. Lobosco K (2013) Sandy-ravaged regions will never get landlines back. www.money.cnn.com/2013/07/22/technology/verizon-wireless-sandy

  26. McDermott J (2012) Poor man’s eoc. www.fema.ideascale.com/a/dtd/Poor-Man-s-EOC/315730-1469

  27. Meier P (2013) Verily: crowdsourced verification for disaster response. www.irevolution.net/2013/02/19/verily-crowdsourcing-evidence/

  28. Pantos R, May W (2013) HTTP live streaming. www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-11

  29. Preis T, Moat HS, Bishop SR, Treleaven P, Stanley HE (2013) Quantifying the digital traces of hurricane sandy on flickr. Scientific Reports 3. doi:10.1038/srep03141

  30. Proctor B (2012) Getting volunteers to monitor digital spaces in emergencies. www.vostuk.org/intranet/2012/08/getting-volunteers-to-monitor%-digital-spaces-in-emergencies

  31. Reuter S (2012) What is a virtual operations support team?. www.idisaster.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/what-is-a-virtual-operatio%ns-support-team

  32. Schulzrinne H, Casner SL, Frederick R, Jacobson V (2003) RFC3550-RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications. www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3550.txt

  33. Schulzrinne H, Rao A, Lanphier R (1998) RFC2326-real time streaming protocol (RTSP). www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2326.txt

  34. Starbird K, Palen L (2012) (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, CSCW ’12, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 7–16. doi:10.1145/2145204.2145212

  35. Stephens K (2013) #SMEM challenge for 2013: strategically monitoring social media. www.idisaster.wordpress.com/2013/01/ 01/smem-challenge-for-2013-st%rategically-monitoring-social-media

  36. Talbot D (2013) Preventing misinformation from spreading through social media. www.technologyreview.com/news/514056/ preventing-misinformatio%n-from-spreading-through-social-media

  37. US Department of Transportation (2013) Next generation 9–1-1. www.its.dot.gov/ng911. Retrieved 24 NOV 2013

  38. Vivacqua AS, Borges MR (2012) Taking advantage of collective knowledge in emergency response systems. J Network Comput Appl 35(1):189–198. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.03.002. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1084804511000567

  39. Wallace WA, De Balogh F (1985) Decision support systems for disaster management. Pub Adm Rev 45:134–146

    Google Scholar 

  40. WebRTC Initative: www.webrtc.org

  41. Yates D, Paquette S (2011) Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: a case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int J Inf Manag 31(1):6–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S02684012100%01453

  42. Zambelli A (2009) IIS smooth streaming technical over- view. www.download.microsoft.com/download/4/2/4/4247C3AA-7105-4764-A8F9%-321CB6C765EB/IISSmoothStreamingTechni calOverview.pdf

  43. Zerger A, Smith DI (2003) Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support. Computers, environment and urban systems 27(2):123–141. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00021-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S01989715010%00217

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this manuscript was implemented thanks to the hard work of several additional developers including Nehil Jain, Stepan Salenikovich, Stephane Beniak, Cameron Bell, and Alok Sharma. In addition, the authors would like to thank Scott Reuter of the National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster, David Black of Crisis Commons, Thomas Poirier-Blanchet of the Minstry for Public Safety (Quebec), and Roger Hand, Emergency Management Director, City of Red Wing, all of whom have been extremely generous in sharing their knowledge and experience with us throughout the development process. Special thanks are due to Glenn Ricart of US Ignite and Will Barkis of Mozilla Ignite for their constant encouragement and inspiration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy R. Cooperstock.

Additional information

This work has been generously supported by a Networks of Centres of Excellence in Graphics, Animation and New Media (GRAND) and by funding supplied by the National Science Foundation through the Mozilla Ignite Challenge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blum, J.R., Eichhorn, A., Smith, S. et al. Real-time emergency response: improved management of real-time information during crisis situations. J Multimodal User Interfaces 8, 161–173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-013-0139-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-013-0139-7

Keywords

Navigation