Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of olfactory cues as Interface notifications on a mobile phone

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olfaction is one of the most important human senses that can help assist human perceptions, and the function of smell is also one of the most important ways that can help human interacting with the environment. Hence, the olfactory cues might become an important design tool to facilitate human-mobile phone interaction. This study therefore adopted olfactory cues as mobile phone prompts to help explore how they affect users’ interactive experience. The experiment of this study implemented a 2 (visual layout) × 3 (olfactory cue) between-subjects design by developing shopping application (app) prototypes. The independent variable of visual layout had two levels, i.e., list layout (LL) and square layout (SL). In addition, the experiment adopted an external device to emit odor to simulate different olfactory cues. The independent variable of olfactory cue had three levels, namely, matched olfactory cue (MOC), mismatched olfactory cue (MMOC), and no olfactory cue (NOC). A total of 72 participants were invited to take part in the experiment via the purposive sampling method. The generated results revealed that: (1) The increase in olfactory cues brought better operational pleasure to the participants; (2) Matching olfactory cues of recommended products (MOC) showed the best interface usability and enhanced the overall operating experience; (3) The user interface of the list layout showed better task operation efficiency than the square layout; (4) An increase in olfactory cues may lower the participants' task efficiency, while no odor cue (NOC) showed the fastest task completion time; and (5) The olfactory cues of rose odor significantly increased the participants’ selection rate for the corresponding product. The olfactory cues have been confirmed in the study to be an important notification to help induce shopping behavior. It may also make online virtual shopping behavior more similar to actual shopping behavior, and improve the overall user experience as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaoui-Ismaïli O, Robin O, Rada H, Dittmar A, Vernet-Maury E (1997) Basic emotions evoked by odorants: comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation. Physiol Behav 62(4):713–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amores J, Maes P (2017) Essence: olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 28–34)

  3. Bodnar A, Corbett R, Nekrasovski D (2004) AROMA: ambient awareness through olfaction in a messaging application. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on multimodal interfaces, pp 183–190

  4. Castiello U, Zucco GM, Parma V, Ansuini C, Tirindelli R (2006) Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and vision when grasping. Chem Senses 31(7):665–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis SB, Davies G, Haddad R, Lai MK (2007) Smell me: engaging with an interactive olfactory game. In: People and computers XX—Engage, Springer, pp 25–40

  6. de Gelder B, Van den Stock J (2011) Real faces, real emotions: perceiving facial expressions in naturalistic contexts of voices, bodies and scenes. In: Calder JA, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV (eds) The handbook of face perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 535–550

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd-Davis S, Davies G, Haddad R, Lai MK (2006) Smell me: engaging with an interactive olfactory game. In: Proceedings 25th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society, pp 25-40

  8. Dinh HQ, Walker N, Hodges LF, Song C, Kobayashi A (1999) Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In: Paper presented at the proceedings IEEE virtual reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316)

  9. Dmitrenko D, Maggioni E, Obrist M (2018) I smell trouble: using multiple scents to convey driving-relevant information. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, pp 234–238

  10. Dobbelstein D, Herrdum S, Rukzio E (2017) inScent: a wearable olfactory display as an amplification for mobile notifications. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international symposium on wearable computers, pp 130–137

  11. Ghinea G, Ademoye O (2012) The sweet smell of success enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl (TOMM) 8(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herz RS, Engen T (1996) Odor memory: review and analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 3(3):300–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herz RS (2016) The role of odor-evoked memory in psychological and physiological health. Brain Sci 6(3):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones L, Bowers CA, Washburn D, Cortes A, Satya RV (2004) The effect of olfaction on immersion into virtual environments. Human performance, situation awareness and automation: issues and considerations for the 21st century, pp 282–285

  15. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort, vol 1063. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 218–226

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaye JN (2001) Symbolic olfactory display, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  17. Kay LM (2011) Olfactory coding: random scents make sense. Curr Biol 21(22):R928–R929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Keller A, Hempstead M, Gomez IA, Gilbert AN, Vosshall LB (2012) An olfactory demography of a diverse metropolitan population. BMC Neurosci 13(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klug B (2017) An overview of the system usability scale in library website and system usability testing. Weave: J Libr User Exp 1(6)

  20. Maggioni E, Cobden R, Dmitrenko D, Obrist M (2018) Smell-O-Message: Integration of olfactory notifications into a messaging application to improve users' performance. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, pp 45–54

  21. Nakamoto T, Yoshikawa K (2006) Movie with scents generated by olfactory display using solenoid valves. IEICE Trans Fundam Electron Commun Comput Sci 89(11):3327–3332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Obrist M, Tuch AN, Hornbaek K (2014) Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 2843–2852

  23. Richard E, Tijou A, Richard P, Ferrier JL (2006) Multi-modal virtual environments for education with haptic and olfactory feedback. Virtual Real 10(3):207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rouby C, Schaal B, Dubois D, Gervais R, Holley A (2002) Olfaction, taste, and cognition. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Seigneuric A, Durand K, Jiang T, Baudouin JY, Schaal B (2010) The nose tells it to the eyes: crossmodal associations between olfaction and vision. Perception 39(11):1541–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tijou A, Richard E, Richard P (2006) Using olfactive virtual environments for learning organic molecules. In: Paper presented at the international conference on technologies for e-learning and digital entertainment

  27. Washburn DA, Jones LM (2004) Could olfactory displays improve data visualization? Comput Sci Eng 6(6):80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wintersberger P, Dmitrenko D, Schartmüller C, Frison AK, Maggioni E, Obrist M, Riener A (2019) S (C) ENTINEL: monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 538–546

  29. Zybura M, Eskeland GA (1999) Olfaction for virtual reality. Quart Proj Ind Eng 543

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Hsiung Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Guidelines

  1. 1.

    Describe how you felt as you operated the task, and if there were any changes (provide pen and paper for participants to take notes). Can you describe/explain what you wrote?

  2. 2.

    Please describe your thoughts and suggestions after completing the task (provide pen and paper). Can you describe/explain what you wrote?

  3. 3.

    Did you notice scent cues? Do you feel the presence of scent cues is positive or negative, and can you explain why?

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, M., Chen, CH. The effects of olfactory cues as Interface notifications on a mobile phone. J Multimodal User Interfaces 17, 21–32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-022-00399-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-022-00399-x

Keywords

Navigation