Skip to main content
Log in

A surrogate model to assess the whole body SAR induced by multiple plane waves at 2.4 GHz

  • Published:
annals of telecommunications - annales des télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of the exposure to electromagnetic waves is nowadays a key question. Dealing with the relationship between exposure and incident field, most of previous investigations have been performed with a single plane wave. Realistic exposure in the far field can be modeled as multiple plane waves with random direction of arrival, random amplitude, and random phase. This paper, based on numerical investigations, studies the whole body specific absorption rate (SAR) linked to the exposure induced by five random plane waves having uniformly distributed angles of arrival in the horizontal plane, log-normal distributed amplitudes, and uniformly distributed phases. A first result shows that this random heterogeneous exposure generates maximal variations of ±25% for the whole body specific absorption. An important observation is that the exposure to a single plane wave arriving face to the body, used for the guidelines, does not constitute the worst case. We propose a surrogate model to assess the distribution of the whole body SAR in the case of an exposure to multiple plane waves. For a sample of 30 values of whole body SAR induced by five plane waves at 2.4 GHz, this simple approach, considering the resulting SAR as the sum of the SAR induced by each isolated plane wave, leads to an estimated distribution of whole body SAR following the real distribution with a p value of 76% according to the Kolmogorov statistical test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time varying electric magnetic and electromagnetic field (up to 300 GHz). Radiat Prot Health Phys 74:494–522

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gandhi OP, Lazzi G, Furse C (1996) Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 MHz and 1900 MHz. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 44:1884–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conil E, Hadjem A, Lacroux F, Wong MF, Wiart J (2008) Variability analysis of SAR from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for different adult and child models using FDTD. Phys Med Biol 53:1511–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadjem A, Lautru D, Dale CM, Wong F, Hanna VF, Wiart J (2005) Study of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) induced in the two child head models and adult heads using a mobile phones. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 53(1):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimbylow PJ (1996) The development of realistic voxel phantoms for electromagnetic field dosimetry Proc Int. Workshop on Voxel Phantom Development (National Radiological Protection Board Report) pp 1–7

  6. Dimbylow P, Bolch W (2007) Whole-body-averaged SAR from 50 MHz to 4 GHz in the University of Florida child voxel phantoms. Phys Med Biol 52:6639–6649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neubauer G, Cecil S, Preiner P, Mitrevski N, Vermeeren G, Wout J, Martens L, Kuehn S, Kuster N (2006) The relation between SAR and the electromagnetic field distribution for heterogeneous exposure conditions, EUCAP, The First European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 6–10 November 2006, Nice, Proceeding CD

  8. Georg Neubauer et al. The relation between the specific absorption rate and electromagnetic field intensity for heterogeneous exposure conditions at mobile communications frequencies. Bioelectromagnetics 30(8):651–662

  9. Kuehn S, Jennings W, Christ A, Kuster N (2009) Assessment of induced radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in various anatomical human body models. Phys Med Biol 54:875–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vermeeren G, Joseph W, Olivier C, Martens L (2008) Statistical multipath exposure of a human in a realistic electromagnetic environment. Health Phys 94(4):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalliola K, Sulonen K, Laitinen H, Kiveks O, Krogerus J, Vainikainen P (2002) Angular power distribution and mean effective gain of mobile antenna in different propagation environments. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 51:823–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El Habachi A, Conil E, Hadjem A, Vazquez E, Wong MF, Gati A, Wiart J (2010) Statistical analysis of whole-body absorption depending on anatomical human characteristics at a frequency of 2.1 GHz. Phys Med Biol 55(1):1875–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn E, Honegger K, Shen J, Rascher W, Janka R, Bautz W, Kiefer B, Schmitt P, Hollenbach H, Chen J, Kam A, Neufeld E, Oberle M, Kuster N (2007) The virtual family project-development of anatomical whole-body models of two adults and two children. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics (ACES)

  14. Wang J, Fujiwara O, Watanabe S (2006) Approximation of aging effect on dielectric tissue properties for SAR assessment of mobile telephones. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 48(2):408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabriel C et al. (1996) Compilation of the dielectric properties of body tissues at RF and microwave frequencies. Brooks Air Force Technical Report AL/OE TE (1996–0037)

  16. Zhao X, Kivinen J, Vainikainen P, Skog K (2002) Propagation characteristics for wideband outdoor mobile communications at 5.3 GHz. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 20:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taflove A, Hagness S (2005) Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method, 3rd edn. Artech House Publish, Norwood, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berenger J (1994) A perfectly matcher layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J Comp Physiol 114:185–200

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Merewether DE, Fisher R, Smith FW (1980) On implementing a numeric Huygen’s source scheme in a finite difference program to illuminate scattering bodies. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 27:1829–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shorack GR, Wellner JA (1986) Empirical processes with applications to statistics. Wiley, New York, p 976

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee WC-Y, Brandt RH (1973) The elevation angle of mobile radio signal arrival. IEEE Trans Commun COM-21(11):1194–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Conil E, Hadjem A, Gati A, Wong M-F, Wiart J (2011) Influence of plane-wave incidence angle on whole body and local exposure at 2100 MHz. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 53(1):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerald CF, Wheatley PO (1994) Applied Numerical Analysis, 5th ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, ch. 10, pp 696–748

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was sponsored by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in the framework of the Mutlipass project (whist.institut-telecom.fr).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Kientega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kientega, T., Conil, E., Hadjem, A. et al. A surrogate model to assess the whole body SAR induced by multiple plane waves at 2.4 GHz. Ann. Telecommun. 66, 419–428 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-011-0261-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-011-0261-z

Keywords

Navigation