Skip to main content
Log in

A new diversity induction mechanism for a multi-objective ant colony algorithm to solve a real-world time and space assembly line balancing problem

  • Special Issue - Regular Research Paper
  • Published:
Memetic Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time and space assembly line balancing considers realistic multi-objective versions of the classical assembly line balancing industrial problems. It involves the joint optimisation of conflicting criteria such as the cycle time, the number of stations, and/or the area of these stations. The different problems included in this area also inherit the precedence constraints and the cycle time limitations from assembly line balancing problems. The presence of these hard constraints and their multi-criteria nature make these problems very hard to solve. Multi-objective constructive metaheuristics (in particular, multi-objective ant colony optimisation) have demonstrated to be suitable approaches to solve time and space assembly line balancing problems. The aim of this contribution is to present a new mechanism to induce diversity in an existing multi-objective ant colony optimisation algorithm for the 1/3 variant of the time and space assembly line balancing problem. This variant is quite realistic in the automative industry as it involves the joint minimisation of the number and the area of the stations given a fixed cycle time limit. The performance of our proposal is validated considering ten real-like problem instances. Moreover, the diversity induction mechanism is also tested on a real-world instance from the Nissan plant in Barcelona (Spain).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barán B, Schaerer M (2003) A multiobjective ant colony system for vehicle routing problem with time windows. In: 21st IASTED international conference, Innsbruck, Germany, pp 97–102

  2. Bautista J, Pereira J (2007) Ant algorithms for a time and space constrained assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 177: 2016–2032

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baybars I (1986) A survey of exact algorithms for the simple assembly line balancing problem. Manage Sci 32(8): 909–932

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chankong V, Haimes YY (1983) Multiobjective decision making theory and methodology. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chica M, Cordón O, Damas S, Bautista J (2009) Multi-objective, constructive heuristics for the 1/3 variant of the time and space assembly line balancing problem: ACO and randomised greedy. Technical Report AFE-09-01, European Centre for Soft Computing, Asturias, Spain. (submitted to Information Sciences)

  6. Chica M, Cordón O, Damas S, Bautista J, Pereira JA (2008) Multiobjective ant colony optimization algorithm for the 1/3 variant of the time and space assembly line balancing problem. In: 12th International conference on processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems (IPMU), Málaga Spain, pp 1454–1461 June

  7. Chica M, Cordón O, Damas S, Bautista J, Pereira J (2009) On using heuristic information in a multi-objective ACO algorithm for the time and space assembly line balancing problem. In: Middendorf M, Engelbrecht AP (eds) Applied swarm intelligence. Series in studies in computational intelligence, Springer (In press)

  8. Coello CA, Lamont GB, Van Veldhuizen DA (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems (2nd edn). Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorigo M, Gambardella L (1997) Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1): 53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. García Martínez C, Cordón O, Herrera F (2007) A taxonomy and an empirical analysis of multiple objective ant colony optimization algorithms for the bi-criteria TSP. Eur J Oper Res 180: 116–148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Glover, F, Kochenberger, GA (eds) (2003) Handbook of metaheuristics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Middendorf M, Reischle F, Schmeck H (2002) Multi colony ant algorithms. J Heuristics 8(3): 305–320

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Scholl A (1999) Balancing and sequencing of assembly lines (2nd edn). Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scholl A, Becker C (2006) State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing. Eur J Oper Res 168(3): 666–693

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zitzler E, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Fonseca CM, Grunert da Fonseca V (2003) Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7(2): 117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Cordón.

Additional information

This work is supported by the UPC Nissan Chair and the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia under project DPI2007-63026 and by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación under project TIN2009-07727, both including EDRF fundings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chica, M., Cordón, O., Damas, S. et al. A new diversity induction mechanism for a multi-objective ant colony algorithm to solve a real-world time and space assembly line balancing problem. Memetic Comp. 3, 15–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-010-0035-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-010-0035-6

Keywords

Navigation