Abstract
The aim of this paper is to shed light on the debate concerning the impact of environmental practices on firms’ efficiency. It focuses on two of the most representative sectors of information and communication technologies’ industry, i.e. computer hardware and telecommunications equipment. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method was chosen to measure firm-level efficiency, since we are interested in the relative evaluation of a firm with respect to all other firms in a given set. The methodology is based on a three-stage approach: (1) construct an appropriate efficiency ratio, (2) divide the sampled companies into two discrete categories, i.e. the companies with more restrictive environmental practices (adherence to specific standards) and those with less restrictive practices (adoption of a general framework), and (3) calculate DEA efficiency scores. According to our findings, ICT companies which implement strict environmental practices are not necessarily more efficient than their rivals. Consequently, except for the case of compulsory regulations, ICT companies should consider all the possibilities and implement the practices best suited to their needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn T, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1988) Efficiency characterizations in different DEA models. Socioecon Plann Sci 22(6):253–257
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (1996) Data Envelopment Analysis, theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer Science Business Media, New York
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data Envelopment Analysis, a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer Science Business Media, New York
Erdmann L, Würtenberger F (2003) The future impact of ICT on environmental sustainability: identification and global description of economic sectors. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Seville. Available at: http://fiste.jrc.ec.europa.eu/download/interim_report_1_final.pdf
Eurostat (2007) R&D industrial investment scoreboard. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=2993,65015306&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
Fuchs M (2004) Strategy development in tourism destinations: a DEA approach. Poznan Univ Econ Rev 4(1):52–73
Gabel HL, Sinclair-Desgagné R (2001) The firm, its procedures and win-win environmental regulations. In: Folmer H, Gabel HL, Gerking S, Rose A (eds) Frontiers of environmental economics. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 148–175
ISO (2004) ISO 14001. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=31807
EU Parliament and EU Council (2002) Directive 2002/96/EC on the waste electrical and electronic equipment directive. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:037:0024:0038:EN:PDF
EU Parliament and EU Council (2003) Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:037:0019:0023:EN:PDF
Plepys A (2002) The grey side of ICT. Environ impact assess rev 22:509–523
Popp D (2006) International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. J Environ Econ Manage 51(1):46–71
Porter M, Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73:120–137
Raab RA, Kotamraju P (2006) The efficiency of the high-tech economy: conventional development indexes versus a performance index. J Reg Sci 46(3):545–562
Reisch LA (2001) The Internet and sustainable consumption: perspectives on a Janus face. J Consum Policy 24(3/4):251–286
Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur J Oper Res 135:102–113
Seiford LM, Zhu J (2002) Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142:16–20
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509
Van der Vlist AJ, Withagen C, Folmer H (2007) Technical efficiency under alternative environmental regulatory regimes: the case of Dutch horticulture. Ecol Econ 63(1):165–173
Whitelaw K (2004) ISO 14001 environmental systems handbook, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stiakakis, E., Fouliras, P. The impact of environmental practices on firms’ efficiency: the case of ICT-producing sectors. Oper Res Int J 9, 311–328 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-009-0035-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-009-0035-9