Skip to main content

Environmental efficiency evaluation with left–right fuzzy numbers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undesirable outputs such as waste and smoke pollution are often produced along with desirable outputs in the production processes of many enterprises. Therefore, when evaluating production efficiency, both desirable and undesirable outputs should be considered simultaneously. Based on the previous data envelopment analysis model, we present a fuzzy slacks-based measure model incorporating a confidence coefficient on the postulation that inputs and outputs are left–right (L–R) fuzzy numbers. In this paper, the model not only solves the input slacks when presetting the confidence coefficient but also solves efficiency evaluation problems when undesirable output exists, thereby expanding the range of applications for environmental efficiency evaluation. Furthermore, it provides a basis for decision making in a wider range of situations to reduce undesirable outputs, control the quantities of pollutants discharged, and improve the environment. To provide an example of this last point, the proposed model is applied to perform an analysis of the industrial environmental performance of 31 provinces in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angiz LMZ, Emrouznejad A, Mustafa A (2012) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis: a discrete approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2263–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Song M, Xu L (2014) Evaluation of environmental efficiency in China using data envelopment analysis. Ecol Indic 52:577–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CR, Liou JL, Wu PI, Fang CL (2012) Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output. Energ Econ 34(5):1392–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YH, Weng WH, Lu LC (2015) The analysis of undesirable output to countries’ productivity: the example of the Asian countries. Energ Source Part B 10(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff H, Allen K (2001) Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Eur J Oper Res 132:312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2004) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. Eur J Oper Res 157(1):242–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(1):66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh DW, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econom 126(2):469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong LG, Sun B (1998) Measuring production with random inputs and outputs using DEA and certainty equivalent. Eur J Oper Res 111(1):62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Z, Zhao Y, Ge X (2014) Efficiency assessment of the energy consumption and economic indicators in Beijing under the influence of short-term climatic factors: based on data envelopment analysis methodology. Nat Hazards 71(2):1145–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailu A (2003) Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: reply. Am J Agr Econ 85(4):1075–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailu A, Veeman T (2001) Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am J Agr Econ 83(3):605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG, Kourtzidis SA (2015) Regional sustainability efficiency index in Europe: an additive two-stage DEA approach. Oper Res Int J 15(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini A, Emrouznejad A, Tavana M (2011) A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur J Oper Res 214(3):457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang VN, Coelli T (2011) Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: a nutrients balance approach. J Environ Econ Manag 62(3):462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Rebennack S, Zheng QP (2013) Techno-economic analysis and optimization models for carbon capture and storage: a survey. Energy Syst 4(4):315–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CY, Chiou CC, Wu TH, Yang SC (2015) An integrated DEA-MODM methodology for portfolio optimization. Oper Res Int J 15(1):115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail Z, Tai JC, Kong KK, Law KH, Shirazi SM, Karim R (2013) Using data envelopment analysis in comparing the environmental performance and technical efficiency of selected companies in their global petroleum operations. Measurement 46(9):3401–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Liu ST (2000) Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst 113(3):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Liu ST (2011) Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Set Syst 176(1):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MI, Yasmin T, Shakoor A (2015) International experience with compressed natural gas (CNG) as environmental friendly fuel. Energy Syst. doi:10.1007/s12667-015-0152-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshfetrat S, Daneshvar S (2011) Improving weak efficiency frontiers in the fuzzy data envelopment analysis models. Appl Math Model 35(3):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leleu H (2013) Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis. Eur J Oper Res 231(2):474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León T, Liern V, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2003) A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the assessment of efficiency with DEA models. Fuzzy Set Syst 139(2):407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Joines JA, Nuttle HLW (2003) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach. Fuzzy Set Syst 139(2):379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Wu J (2006) An improving completely ranking approach for interval DEA. Syst Eng 24(1):107–110 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson AJ, Principe PP, Shao Y (2013) Controlling for exogenous environmental variables when using data envelopment analysis for regional environmental assessments. J Environ Manag 119:220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal SK (2010) Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian cement industry. Energy Policy 38(10):6076–6083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkan C, Wang JM, Wu DS, Wei GW (2012) Data envelopment analysis based on maximum relative efficiency criterion. Comput Oper Res 39(11):2478–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri J, Yadav SP (2014) A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6419–6432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccardi R, Oggioni G, Toninelli R (2012) Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function. Energy Policy 44:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-Garrido R, Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M (2012) Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances approach. Environ Sci Policy 18:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel H (2001) Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluations. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):400–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (2002) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142(1):16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song ML, An QX, Zhang W, Wang ZY, Wu J (2012) Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 16(7):4465–4469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Peng J, Wu Q (2014) An undesirable-output-considered super-efficiency DEA model and its illustration in evaluation of thermoelectric enterprises. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(3):1507–1517

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah A, Perret SR (2014) Technical- and environmental-efficiency analysis of irrigated cotton-cropping systems in Punjab, Pakistan using data envelopment analysis. Environ Manag 54(2):288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Luo Y, Liang L (2009) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis based upon fuzzy arithmetic with an application to performance assessment of manufacturing enterprises. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5205–5211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen ML, Li HS (2009) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): model and ranking method. J Comput Appl Math 223(2):872–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DS, Yang Z, Liang L (2006) Efficiency analysis of cross-region bank branches using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 181(1):271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, An Q, Yao X, Wang B (2014) Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 74:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Xiong B, An Q, Zhu Q, Liang L (2015) Measuring the performance of thermal power firms in China via fuzzy enhanced Russell measure model with undesirable outputs. J Clean Prod 102:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You S, Yan H (2011) A new approach in modelling undesirable output in DEA model. J Oper Res Soc 62(12):2146–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng XY, Wu YH (2001) DEA model with L–R type interval numbers and its transformation. J Ind Eng Eng Manag 15(1):11–13 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Choi Y (2013) Environmental energy efficiency of China’s regional economies: a non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. Soc Sci J 50(2):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Major Projects in Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 14JZD031; the Program of Post-Graduate Scientific Research Innovation Fund by Anhui University of Finance and Economics under Grant No. CXJJ2014069; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University under Grant No. NCET-12-0595; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71171001 and 71471001; and Key Projects in Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui, China under Grant No. AHSKZ2014D01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ma-Lin Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, ML., Zhou, YX., Zhang, RR. et al. Environmental efficiency evaluation with left–right fuzzy numbers. Oper Res Int J 17, 697–714 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0202-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0202-0

Keywords