Abstract
The assessment of criteria weights in multicriteria decision aid methods of value system approaches, often leads to the assessment of preference models with a low degree of robustness due to the assessment of several compatible value functions. This research work presents a methodological frame, which aims to three issues: (a) to explain the nature of low robustness of the estimated preference models, utilising tomographical techniques, visual tools, and specific indices for the robustness measurement, (b) to support the Decision Makers (DMs) towards a deeper understanding of his/her value system, and (c) to acquire additional preference information by the DM estimating a value functions of higher robustness through focused interactive feedbacks. The main scope of this research work is to exploit and enrich the interactive nature of the multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approach. The proposed methodology is applied on a real world case study along with the utilisation of the RAVI (Robustness Analysis with Visual and Interactive approaches) software developed to support the above mentioned methodological approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34b32/34b323481b14605de907d6c2f9de45397973883a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2692/f26923fb12220a713f184843d1cc0346f1ccee80" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ab17/3ab17a87d6e4c5e1d5452653a14e9f5c7f7a8467" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0771/f0771d561ff71d6c0f222158eac81d6f6d4f8c98" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f9b7/0f9b7484fce23e5dc380cd9b75c24a24caa35815" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2136/b2136d66f43528e191b9ab0d57355cd6cbef9fe0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aac1/1aac14f3018f3efbe19622bf36b191a810648a72" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be3b7/be3b732a214fccb8842c004fca85a9de7d919b16" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f1c8/9f1c8feb3ffcdf1158102093af1feb800e087b1e" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beuthe M, Scannella G (2001) Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):246–262
Bouyssou D (1990) Building criteria: a prerequisite for MCDA In: Bana e Costa CA (ed) Readings in multiple criteria decision-aid, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 58–80
Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (2016) Data-driven robustness analysis for multicriteria classification problems using preference disaggregation approaches. In: Doumpos M, Zopounidis C, Grigoroudis E (eds) Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics, vol 241. Springer, Cham, pp 21–37
Doumpos M, Zopounidis C, Galariotis E (2014) Inferring robust decision models in multicriteria classification problems: an experimental analysis. Eur J Oper Res 236(2):601–611
Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):317–326
Figueira JR, Greco S, Słowiński R (2009) Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):460–486
Greco S, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2008) Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur J Oper Res 191(2):416–436
Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2012) Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP. Decis Support Syst 52(3):549–561
Grigoroudis E, Siskos Y (2010) Customer satisfaction evaluation: methods for measuring and implementing service quality. Springer, New York
Hurson C, Siskos Y (2014) A synergy of multicriteria techniques to assess additive value models. Eur J Oper Res 238(2):540–551
Jacquet-Lagreze E, Siskos J (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164
Kadziński M, Greco S, Slowiński R (2012a) Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega 40(4):488–501
Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R (2012b) Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice. Eur J Oper Res 217(3):541–553
Kadziński M, Ghaderi M, Wąsikowski J, Agell N (2017) Expressiveness and robustness measures for the evaluation of an additive value function in multiple criteria preference disaggregation methods: an experimental analysis. Comput Oper Res 87(Supplement C):146–164
Maňas M, Nedoma J (1968) Finding all vertices of a convex polyhedron. Numer Math 12(3):226–229
Roy B (2010) Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: a multi-faceted issue. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):629–638
Simos J (1990a) Evaluer l’impact Sur l’environnement: Une Approche Originale Par l’analyse Multicritère et La Négociation. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne
Simos J (1990b) L’évaluation Environnementale: Un Processus Cognitif Négocié. Thèse de Doctorat, DGF EPFL, Lausanne
Siskos Y (1980) Comment modeliser les preferences au moyen de fonctions d’utilite additives. RAIRO Recherche Operationnelle 14:53–82
Siskos E, Tsotsolas N (2015) Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: a robustness concern. Eur J Oper Res 246(2):543–553
Siskos Y, Yannacopoulos D (1985) UTASTAR, an ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigacao Operacional 5(1):39–53
Siskos Y, Spyridakos A, Yannacopoulos D (1993) MINORA: A multicriteria decision aiding system for discrete alternatives, J Inf Sci Technol. In: Siskos Y, Zopounidis C (eds) Special issue on multicriteria decision support systems, 2, pp 136–149
Siskos Y, Spyridakos A, Yannacopoulos D (1999) Using artificial intelligence and visual techniques into preference disaggregation analysis: the MIIDAS system. Eur J Oper Res 113(2):281–299
Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Matsatsinis NF (2016) UTA Methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis, vol 233. Springer. New York, NY, pp 315–362
Spyridakos A, Psaromiligkos Y, Vryzidis L, Litsardaki M, Salmon I (2012) Survey forest fire detection systems via multicriteria disaggregation-aggregation approach: the case of Lycabettus Hill. Int J Multicriteria Decis Mak 2(1):29–46
Spyridakos A, Tsotsolas N, Yannacopoulos D, Siskos E (2015) Estimating criteria weights exploiting priorities of the criteria and techniques of robustness analysis In: 4th International Symposium and 26th National Conference on Operational Rearch, Chania, Crete, Greece on June 4–6
Tsotsolas N, Spyridakos A, Siskos E, Salmon I (2016) Criteria weights assessment through prioritizations (WAP) using linear programming techniques and visualizations. Oper Res Int J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0280-7
Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2000) PREFDIS: a multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems. Comput Oper Res 27(7):779–797
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spyridakos, A., Tsotsolas, N., Siskos, Y. et al. A visualization approach for robustness analysis in multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approaches. Oper Res Int J 20, 1841–1861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0394-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0394-1