Abstract
The closer the supply chain network (SCN) modeling to the real world, the more accurate decisions can be made. In this regard, it is essential to take into account of the factors in the real world such as the formation of the queuing system in the producers of the SCN, and batch transportation and processing (BTP) approaches, as well as the operational and disruption risks. In this research, batch sizes are considered equal to the potential transportation capacity of vehicles. The present paper considers simultaneous optimization of total cost, total time and average total number of commodities dispatched from any echelon of the SCN to the next echelon on a five-echelon multi-period SCN including suppliers, manufacturing plants, assemblers, distribution centers, and customers. To deal with the disruption risk, the reliability of facilities in sending the commodities is computed based on the exponential distribution and is maximized in the third objective function. Additionally, to tackle the operational risk of the problem, we convert the proposed tri-objective mathematical model into the robust mathematical model using Ben-Tal method (ρ-Robust method). Then five multi-objective decision-making (MODM) solution methods are selected to solve the problem. The results of these five methods are compared and the best MODM solution method is selected based on the objective function values and the CPU times. Finally, a novel solution is proposed to find the dominant and dominated objective functions in multi-objective models based on the uncertainty level (⍴) of the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baghalian A, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ (2013) Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case. Eur J Oper Res 227(1):199–215
Behdani B (2013). Handling disruptions in supply chains: an integrated framework and an agent-based model: TU Delft, Delft University of Technology
Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Op Res 23:769–805
Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions to uncertain linear programs. Op Res Lett 25:1–13
Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88:411–424
Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2008) Selected topics in robust convex optimization. Math Program 112(2008):125–158
Ben-Tal A, Golany B, Nemirovski A, Vial J-P (2005) Retailer-Supplier flexible commitments contracts: a robust optimization approach. Manuf Ser Op Manag 7:248–271
Ben-Tal A, El-Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52:35–53
Diabat A, Jabbarzadeh A, Khosrojerdi A (2018) A perishable product supply chain network problem with reliability and disruption considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, In Press
Ghavamifar A, Makui A, Taleizadeh AA (2018) Designing a resilient competitive supply chain network under disruption risks: A real-world application. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 115:87–109
Ghodratnama A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Azaron A (2015) Robust and fuzzy goal programming optimization approaches fora novel multi-objective hub location-allocation problem: a supply chain overview. Appl Soft Comput 37:255–276
Goh M, Lim JY, Meng F (2007) A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. Eur J Oper Res 182:164–173
Govindan K, Fattahi M, Keyvanshokooh E (2017) Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. European Journal of Operational Research
Hamidieh A, Naderi B, Mohammadi M, Fazli-Khalaf M (2017) A robust possibilistic programming model for a responsive closed loop supply chain network design. Cogent Mathematics
Hasani A, Khosrojerdi A (2016) Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: a parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 87:20–52
Hatefi SM, Jolai F (2014) Robust and reliable forward–reverse logistics network design under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions. Appl Math Model 38:2630–2647
Hatefi S, Jolai F, Torabi S, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2015) A credibility-constrained programming for reliable forward–reverse logistics network design under uncertainty and facility disruptions. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(6):664–678
Heidari-Fathian H, Pasandideh SHR (2018) Green-blood supply chain network design: robust optimization, bounded objective function & lagrangian relaxation. Comput Ind Eng 122:95–105
Inuiguchi M, Sakawa M (1995) MiniMax\;regret solution to linear programming problems with an interval objective function. Eur J Oper Res 86:526–536
Jabbarzadeh A, Jalali Naini SG, Davoudpour H, Azad N (2012) Designing a supply chain network under the risk of disruptions. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012
Jabbarzadeh A, Haughton M, Khosrojerdi A (2018) Closed-loop supply chain network design under disruption risks: a robust approach with real world application. Comput Ind Eng 116:178–191
José Alem D, Morabito R (2012) Production planning in furniture settings via robust optimization. Comput Oper Res 39:139–150
Keyvanshokooh E, Ryan MS, Kabir E (2015) Hybrid robust and stochastic optimization for closed-loop supply chain network design using accelerated Benders decomposition. Eur J Oper Res 249(1):76–92
Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management 14:53–68
Klibi W, Martel A (2012) Modeling approaches for the design of resilient supply networks under disruptions. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):882–898
Li Q, Savachkin A (2016) Reliable distribution networks design with nonlinear fortification function. Int J Syst Sci 47(4):805–813
Liu Y, Guo B (2014) A lexicographic approach to postdisaster relief logistics planning considering fill rates and costs under uncertainty. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014
Mulvey J, Vanderbei R, Zenios S (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43:264–281
Noyan N (2012) Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management. Comput Oper Res 39(3):541–559
Pan F, Nagi R (2010) Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput Oper Res 37:668–683
Pasandideh SHR, Akhavan Niaki ST (2014) Optimizing a bi-objective multi-product multi-period three echelon supply chain network with warehouse reliability. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2615–2623
Peidro D, Mula J, Poler R, Verdegay J (2009) Fuzzy optimization for supply chain planning under supply, demand and process uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160:2640–2657
Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M, Torabi SA (2011) A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 35:637–649
Ramezanian R, Behboodi Z (2017) Blood supply chain network design under uncertainties in supply and demand considering social aspects. Transp Res Part E 104:69–82
Sabouhi F, Pishvaee MS, Jabalameli MS (2018) Resilient supply chain design under operational and disruption risks considering quantity discount: a case study of pharmaceutical supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 126:657–672
Sadghiani NS, Torabi S, Sahebjamnia N (2015) Retail supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 75:95–114
Shen Z, Zhan L, Zhang J (2010) The reliable facility location problem: formulations, heuristics and approximation algorithms. Inf J Comput 23:470–482
Snyder LV, Atan Z, Peng P, Rong Y, Schmitt AJ, Sinsoysal B (2016) OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review. IIE Trans 48(2):89–109
Soyster A (1973) Technical note—convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1154–1157
Talaei M, Farhang Moghaddam B, Pishvaee MS, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Gholamnejad SA (2016) Robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry. J Clean Prod 113:662–673
Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488
Tang C, Tomlin B (2008) The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):12–27
Vahdani B, Mohamadi M (2015) A bi-objective interval-stochastic robust optimization model for designing closed loop supply chain network with multi-priority queuing system. Int J Prod Econ 170(1):67–87
Vahdani B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Modarres M, Baboli A (2012) Reliable design of a forward/reverse logistics network under uncertainty: a robust-M/M/c queuing model. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 48:1152–1168
Vahdani B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Jolai F (2013) Reliable design of a logistics network under uncertainty: a fuzzy possibilistic-queuing model. Appl Math Model 37:3254–3268
Yousefi-Babadi A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Seifi S (2017) Designing a reliable multi-objective queuing model of a petrochemical supply chain network under uncertainty: a case study. Comput Chem Eng 100:177–197
Zahiri B, Jula P, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2017) Design of a pharmaceutical supply chain network under uncertainty considering perishability and substitutability of products. Inf Sci 423:257–283
Zhalechian M, Torabi AS, Mohammadi M (2018) Hub-and-spoke network design under operational and disruption risks. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 109:20–43
Zokaee S, Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Sadjadi SJ (2014) Robust supply chain network design: an optimization model with real world application. Annals of Operations Research, 1–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nazari-Ghanbarloo, V., Ghodratnama, A. Optimizing a robust tri-objective multi-period reliable supply chain network considering queuing system and operational and disruption risks. Oper Res Int J 21, 1963–2020 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00494-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00494-0