Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decomposition of cost efficiency with adjustable prices: an application of data envelopment analysis

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper focuses on the possibilities for a cost efficiency (CE) decomposition using data envelopment analysis (DEA) models in situations when input prices are not identical among decision making units (DMUs). To date, several approaches dealing with the CE decomposition under conditions of non-competitive markets with adjustable input prices have been developed in the DEA literature. This paper summarizes four main DEA models for CE decomposition in situations where DMUs are not price takers and compares them with the newly developed approach for CE decomposition in which the individual efficiency components are consistent with their traditional definitions. Based on the decomposition of the actual total cost of DMUs on the minimum total cost and the potential cost savings due to input inefficiencies, the CE measure is disentangled into Pareto-Koopmans efficiency component, price efficiency component and allocative efficiency component. To highlight the main differences between the new and the existing CE models a simple illustrative example is given. The applicability of the measures developed is illustrated in the context of the analysis of bus transport undertaking performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aparicio J, Borras F, Pastor JT, Vidal F (2013) Accounting for slacks to measure and decompose revenue efficiency in the Spanish designation of origin wines with DEA. Eur J Oper Res 231:443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Borras F, Pastor JT, Vidal F (2015) Measuring and decomposing firm’s revenue and cost efficiency: the Russell measures revisited. Int J Prod Econ 165:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asbullah MA, Jaafar A (2010) A new approach to estimate the mix efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Sci 4:2135–2143

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnum DT, Gleason JM (2011) Measuring efficiency under fixed proportion technologies. J Prod Anal 35:243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besstremyannaya G (2013) The impact of Japanese hospital financing reform on hospital efficiency: a difference-in-difference approach. Jpn Econ Rev 64:337–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W (1998) Hölder distance function and measurement of technical efficiency. J Prod Anal 11:111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho AS, Dyson RG (2008) A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings. Omega Int J Manag Sci 36:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 70:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory App 98:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas JP, Cox TM (1999) A generalized distance function and the analysis of production efficiency. South Econ J 66:295–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupet J (2018) Exploring the link between government funding and efficiency in nonprofit colleges. Nonprofit Manag Lead 29:65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Hamilton R, Tippett M (2014) Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: a comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis. Econ Model 36:298–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Prod Anal 13:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2003) New directions: efficiency and productivity. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Zelenyuk V (2007) Finding common ground: efficiency indices. In: Färe R, Grosskopf S, Primont D (eds) Aggregation, efficiency, and measurement. Springer, Boston, pp 83–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Fukuyama H, Grosskopf S, Zelenyuk V (2016) Cost decompositions and the efficient subset. Omega Int J Manag Sci 62:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A Stat 120:253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (2008) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 33–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pančurová D, Lyocsa S (2013) Determinants of commercial banks’ efficiency: evidence from 11 CEE countries. Finance Uver 63:152–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS (2014) Value and quantity data in economic and technical efficiency measurement. Econ Lett 124:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E (2014) Economic efficiency when prices are not fixed: disentangling quantity and price efficiency. Omega Int J Manag Sci 47:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray S, Chen L, Mukherjee K (2008) Input price variation across locations and a generalised measure of cost efficiency. Int J Prod Econ 116:208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roháčová V (2011) Cost efficiency of selected transport companies in the Czech Republic—an application of data envelopment analysis. Ekon Rev Cent Eur Rev Econ Issues 14:175–182. https://doi.org/10.7327/cerei.2011.09.03(in Slovak)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1953) Cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis E, Portela MCAS, Graveney M (2012) Estimating the scope for savings in referrals and drug prescription costs in the General Practice units of a UK Primary Care Trust. Eur J Oper Res 221:432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis E, Sotiros D, Koronakos G, Despotis D (2018) Assessing the cost-effectiveness of university academic recruitment and promotion policies. Eur J Oper Res 264:742–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (1998) On mix efficiency in DEA, vol 1. The Operations Research Society of Japan, pp 14–15. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003478327/en. Accessed 6 April 2016

  • Tone K (2002) A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA. J Oper Res Soc 53:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Tsutsui M (2007) Decomposition of cost efficiency and its application to Japan-US electric utility comparisons. Socio Econ Plan Sci 41:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MM, Chang YC, Chen LH (2016) Measurement of airlines’ capacity utilization and cost gap: evidence from low-cost carriers. J Air Transp Manag 53:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of the grant scheme VEGA (1/0843/18 Methodological aspects of DEA application on efficiency assessment of production units) is gladly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Quantitative Methods and Information Systems, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Tajovského 10, 975 90, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

    Viera Mendelová

Authors
  1. Viera Mendelová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viera Mendelová.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendelová, V. Decomposition of cost efficiency with adjustable prices: an application of data envelopment analysis. Oper Res Int J 21, 2739–2770 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00525-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00525-w

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification

Search

Navigation