Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Assessing the cooperation propensity of social entrepreneurs: a multicriteria analysis of human factor effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social enterprises (SEs) hold a key innovation and development role owing to their focus on delivering the goals of the social economy sphere of action. The latter relates to social, economic, and political goods which fall into the failure locus of both the private markets and the public sector of the economy. As such SEs are considered a valuable and flexible instrument complementing the overall entrepreneurship and innovative initiatives of all economies. Here we test for the innovative and cooperation propensity of social entrepreneurs giving policy makers in the field an informative model of how to assess high impact SEs. We focus on the role of human factor (composition of human, social and psychological capital) and test for its effect using a dataset of 114 Greek social enterprises’ members. The observed differences between the human factor variables that determine the innovative and cooperation propensity of agricultural cooperatives’ members in contrast to social purpose enterprises’ members illustrate the presence of different channels through which public sector—social actor cooperation in the filed might be built. Important insights for decision making in the field are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These results are not reported here but are available upon request.

References

  • Afrasiabi A, Chalmardi MK, Balezentis T (2022) A novel hybrid evaluation framework for public organizations based on employees’ performance factors. Eval Program Plann. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarifi G, Robson P, Kromidha E (2019) The manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the social entrepreneurship context. J Soc Entrep 10(3):307–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim BT (2019) Smart specialization, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 32(1):8–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balland PA, Boschma R, Crespo J, Rigby DL (2019) Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Reg Stud 53(9):1252–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal S, Garg I, Sharma GD (2019) Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: a systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability 11(4):1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitros GC (2013) From riches to rags or what went wrong in Greece. J Econ Soc Meas 38(1):5–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozhikin I, Macke J, Da Costa LF (2019) The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 226:730–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DF (eds) (2006) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Praeger, Westport

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DF (2010) Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 1(1):41–69

  • Carayannis EG, Meissner D (2017) Glocal targeted open innovation: challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. J Technol Transf 42(2):236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Von Zedtwitz M (2005) Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation 25(2):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Alexander J, Ioannidis A (2000) Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France. Technovation 20(9):477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DF (2012) The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep 1(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Sindakis S, Walter C (2014) Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. J Knowl Econ 5(3):440–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DF, Meissner D, Stamati D (2018) The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Manag 48(1):148–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DF, Grigoroudis E (2021) Helix trilogy: the triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00813-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge T (2018) Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Soc Cap Res 20:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Adda D, Guzzini E, Iacobucci D, Palloni R (2019) Is smart specialization strategy coherent with regional innovative capabilities? Reg Stud 53(7):1004–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organ Sci 22(5):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice M, Carayannis EG, Palacios-Marqués D, Soto-Acosta P, Meissner D (2018) The human dimension of open innovation. Manag Decis 56(6):1159–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux D, Porto Gomez I (2017) A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. Eur Plan Stud 25(3):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi A, Weerawardena J (2018) Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct. J Bus Res 86:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EESC (2016) Resent evolutions of the social economy in the European Union. By CIRIEC-International - Centre International De Recherches et D'information Sur L' Économie Publique. Sociale et Cooperative. Study of the European Economic and Social Committee. CES/CSS/12/2016/23406. Available at: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-04-17-875-en-n.pdf

  • Efthimiou P (2017) new type of cooperative enterprises. Dianeosis, Research and Development Organization, Athens ([In Greek])

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng L, Friis A, Nilsson J (2016) Social capital among members in grain marketing cooperatives of different sizes. Agribusiness 32(1):113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes C, Farinha L, Ferreira JJ, Asheim B, Rutten R (2021) Regional innovation systems: what can we learn from 25 years of scientific achievements? Reg Stud 55(3):377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray D (2014) From smart specialization to smart specialization policy. Eur J Innov Manag 17(4):492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville JL, Paxton P (2007) How do we learn to trust? a confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust. Soc Psychol Q 70(3):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundel I, Dahlström M (2016) A quadruple and quintuple helix approach to regional innovation systems in the transformation to a forestry-based bioeconomy. J Knowl Econ 7(4):963–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Chauhan S, Paul J, Jaiswal MP (2020) Social entrepreneurship research: a review and future research agenda. J Bus Res 113:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jilinskaya-Pandey M, Wade J (2019) Social entrepreneur quotient: an international perspective on social entrepreneur personalities. J Soc Entrep 10(3):265–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser PM, Davis J (2010) Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. J Small Bus Entrep 23(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-Y (2018) An internal control system that includes corporate social responsibility for social sustainability in the new era. Sustainability 10(10):3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes J, Franco M (2019) Review about regional development networks: an ecosystem model proposal. J Knowl Econ 10(1):275–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macke J, Dilly EK (2010) Social capital dimensions in collaborative networks: the role of linking social capital. Int J Soc Inq 3(2):121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Govindan K, Amat Senin A, Jusoh A (2016) VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability 8:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques C, Marques AV, Braga V, Ratten V (2021) Technological transfer and spillovers within the RIS3 entrepreneurial ecosystems: a quadruple helix approach. Knowl Manag Res Pract 19(1):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conesa I, Soto-Acosta P, Carayannis EG (2017) On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. J Knowl Manag 21(3):553–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinidis G (2020) The contribution of the human factor to systems of innovation and the formulation of regional innovation policies. Crest Innov Manag Res Wave 97:849–879

  • Martinidis G, Komninos N, Carayannis E (2021) Taking into account the human factor in regional innovation systems and policies. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00722-z

  • Moody J, Paxton P (2009) Building bridges: linking social capital and social networks to improve theory and research. Am Behav Sci 52(11):1491–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MH, Santos SC, Kuratko DF (2021) The great divides in social entrepreneurship and where they lead us. Small Bus Econ 57(3):1089–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz P, Kimmitt J (2019) Social mission as competitive advantage: a configurational analysis of the strategic conditions of social entrepreneurship. J Bus Res 101:854–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolás C, Rubio A, Fernández-Laviada A (2018) Cognitive determinants of social entrepreneurship: variations according to the degree of economic development. J Soc Entrep 9(2):154–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng G (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papathanasiou J, Ploskas N, Bournaris T, Manos B (2016) A decision support system for multiple criteria alternative ranking using TOPSIS and VIKOR: a case study on social sustainability in agriculture. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process 250:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32877-5_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patulny R, Svendsen GL (2007) Exploring the social capital grid. Bridging, bonding, qualitative, quantitative. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 27(12):32–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploskas N, Papathanasiou J (2019) A decision support system for multiple criteria alternative ranking using TOPSIS and VIKOR in fuzzy and nonfuzzy environments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 377:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsiglione C, Quinto I, Zollo G (2018) Regional innovation systems as complex adaptive systems: the case of lagging European regions. Sustainability 10(8):2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinthupundaja J, Kohda Y, Chiadamrong N (2020) Examining capabilities of social entrepreneurship for shared value creation. J Soc Entrep 11(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (2001) A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput Commun Rev 5(1):3–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear R (2006) Social entrepreneurship: a different model? Int J Soc Econ 33(5/6):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tho ND (2020) Team psychological capital and innovation: the mediating of team exploratory and exploitative learning. J Knowl Manag 25(7):1745–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uen JF, Vandavasi RKK, Lee K, Yepuru P, Saini V (2021) Job crafting and psychological capital: a multi-level study of their effects on innovative work behaviour. Team Perform Manag Int J 27(1/2):145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valmohammadi C, Shahrashoob V (2022) Determinants of the human capital department development programs toward achieving functional strategic objectives: a fuzzy hybrid approach. Ind Commer Train. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-02-2021-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Soc 27(2):151–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon H, Yun S, Lee J, Phillips F (2015) Entrepreneurship in East Asian regional innovation systems: role of social capital. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 100:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Peloponnese, Thesi Sechi (Proin 4O Pedio Volis), 22100, Tripoli, Greece

    Irene Daskalopoulou, Zafeirios Thomakis & Alexandros Parthymos

  2. Department of Business Administration, International Hellenic University, Terma Magnesia, 62100, Serres, Greece

    Athanasia Karakitsiou

Authors
  1. Irene Daskalopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Athanasia Karakitsiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zafeirios Thomakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandros Parthymos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasia Karakitsiou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 6 Definition and measurement of variables
Full size table

6

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daskalopoulou, I., Karakitsiou, A., Thomakis, Z. et al. Assessing the cooperation propensity of social entrepreneurs: a multicriteria analysis of human factor effects. Oper Res Int J 22, 5569–5595 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-022-00736-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-022-00736-8

Keywords

JEL Classification