Abstract
This paper studies the treatment of ratio independent undesirable outputs which may arise in some real problems. Considering the structure, the principles of related production technology are described. Then the resulting production possibility set is introduced. Focusing on the nature of such undesirable outputs, a linear programming problem is presented. Then the model is developed regarding two aspects. Finally, the approach is implemented on two numerical examples and the results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfredsson E, Mansson J, Vikstrom P (2016) Internalising external environmental effects in efficiency analysis: The Swedish pulp and paper industry 2000–2007. Economic Analysis and Policy 51:22–31
Ball VE, Lovell CK, Luu H, Nehring R (2004) Incorporating environmental impacts in the measurement of agricultural productivity growth. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(3):436–460
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research 2(6):429–444
Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T (2007) An introduction to Benefit of the doubt composite indicators. Social Indicators Research 82(1):111–145
Chen PC, Yu MM, Chang CC, Hsu SH, Managi S (2015) The enhanced Russell-based directional distance measure with undesirable outputs: Numerical example considering CO2 emissions. Omega 53:30–40
Chung YH, Fare R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management 51(3):229–240
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2001) Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer, US
Emrouznejad A, Amin GR (2009) DEA models for ratio data: Convexity consideration. Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(1):486–498
Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics 71:90–98
Gerami J, Mozaffari MR, Wanke PF (2020) A Multi-Criteria Ratio-Based Approach for Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 113508
Gomes EG, Lins MPE (2008) Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59(5):616–623
Guo P, Qi X, Zhou X, Li W (2018) Total-factor energy efficiency of coal consumption: an empirical analysis of China’s energy intensive industries. Journal of cleaner production 172:2618–2624
Hailu A, Veeman TS (2001) Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3):605–616
Halkos G, Petrou KN (2019) Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review. Economic Analysis and Policy 62:97–104
Hatami-Marbini A, Toloo M (2019) Data envelopment analysis models with ratio data: A revisit. Computers and Industrial Engineering 133:331–338
He F, Zhang Q, Lei J, Fu W, Xu X (2013) Energy efficiency and productivity change of China’s iron and steel industry: Accounting for undesirable outputs. Energy Policy 54:204–213
Hollingsworth B, Smith P (2003) Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics Letters 10:733–735
Huang J, Chen J, Yin Z (2014) A Network DEA Model with Super Efficiency and Undesirable Outputs: An Application to Bank Efficiency in China, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2014, Article ID 793192, 14 pages
Hwang CL, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin
Khoshroo A, Izadikhah M, Emrouznejad A (2018) Improving energy efficiency considering reduction of CO2 emission of turnip production: A novel data envelopment analysis model with undesirable output approach. Journal of cleaner production 187:605–615
Korhonen P, Luptacik M (2003) Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 437-446
Lee BL, Wilson C, Pasurka Jr, Carl A, Fujii H, Managi S (2017) Sources of airline productivity from carbon emissions: An analysis of operational performance under good and bad outputs, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(3), 223-246
Olesen OB, Petersen NC, Podinovski VV (2015) Efficiency analysis with ratio measures. European Journal of Operational Research 245(2):446–462
Olesen OB, Petersen NC, Podinovski VV (2017) Efficiency measures and computational approaches for data envelopment analysis models with ratio inputs and outputs. European Journal of Operational Research 261:640–655
Pathomsiri S, Haghani A, Dresner M, Windle RJ (2008) Impact of undesirable outputs on the productivity of US airports. Transportation Research, Part E 44:235–259
Piao SR, Li J, Ting CJ (2019) Assessing regional environmental efficiency in China with distinguishing weak and strong disposability of undesirable outputs. Journal of Cleaner Production 227:748–759
Pishgar-Komleh SH, Zylowski T, Rozakis S, Kozyra J (2020) Efficiency under different methods for incorporating undesirable outputs in an LCA+ DEA framework: A case study of winter wheat production in Poland. Journal of environmental management 260:110138
Pittman R (1983) Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. The Economic Journal 93:883–891
Podinovski VV (2019) Direct estimation of marginal characteristics of nonparametric production frontiers in the presence of undesirable outputs. European Journal of Operational Research 279(1):258–276
Sarkhosh-Sara A, Tavassoli M, Heshmati A (2020) Assessing the sustainability of high-, middle-, and low-income countries: A network DEA model in the presence of both zero data and undesirable outputs. Sustainable Production and Consumption 21:252–268
Seiford LM, Zhu J (2001) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 142:16–20
Scheel H (2001) Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research 132:400–410
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012) Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries, Energy Economics, 686-699
Tamaki T, Nakamura H, Fujii H, Managi S (2016) Efficiency and emissions from urban transport: Application to world city-level public transportation, Economic Analysis and Policy, 61(C), 55-63
Toloo M, Hanclova J (2019) Multi-valued measures in DEA in the presence of undesirable outputs, Omega, 94(C)
Tyteca D (1996) On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms-A literature review and a productivity efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 46:281–308
Tyteca D (1997) Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms - Concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8:183–197
Valadkhani A, Roshdi I, Smyth R (2016) A multiplicative environmental DEA approach to measure efficiency changes in the world’s major polluters. Energy Economics 54:363–375
Wu H, Du S, Zhou Y (2013) A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 58(5–6):1095–1101
Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z, Yuan Z, Ge J (2008) Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics 68:306–316
Zhang J, Cai W, Li H, Olanipekun AO, Skitmore M (2020) Measuring the capacity utilization of China’s regional construction industries considering undesirable output. Journal of Cleaner Production 252:119549
Zhou P, Ang BW, Wang H (2012) Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research 221:625–635
Zhou Z, Xu G, Wang C, Wu J (2019) Modeling undesirable output with a DEA approach based on an exponential transformation: An application to measure the energy efficiency of Chinese industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 236:117717
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramezani-Tarkhorani, S., Shirdel, G.H. On concept of undesirable outputs in data envelopment analysis: ratio independent undesirable outputs. Oper Res Int J 23, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00801-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00801-w