Skip to main content
Log in

Humanoid Robots as a Broadcasting Communication Medium in Open Public Spaces

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports a method that uses humanoid robots as a communication medium. Even though many interactive robots are being developed, their interactivity remains much poorer than that of humans due to their limited perception abilities. In our approach, the role of interactive robots is limited to a broadcasting medium for exploring the best way to attract people’s interest to information provided by robots. We propose using robots as a passive social medium, in which they behave as if they are talking together. We conducted an eight-day field experiment at a train station to investigate the effects of such a passive social medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Kamashima M, Imai M, Ishiguro H (2005) Cooperative embodied communication emerged by interactive humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassell J, Bickmore T, Billinghurst M, Campbell L, Chang K, Vilhjalmsson H, Yan H (1999) Embodiment in conversational interfaces: rea. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1999, pp 520–527

  3. Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2004) Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2004, vol 4, pp 3559–3564

  4. Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K (2004) Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc IEEE 92(11):1780–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2002) A quantitative technique for analysing robot-human interactions. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2002, vol 2, pp 1132–1138

  6. Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2005) Interactive robots for communication-care: A case-study in autism therapy. In: Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2005, pp 341–346

  7. Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(46):17954–17958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegwart R (2003) Robox at Expo.02: a large scale installation of personal robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:203–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2006) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 305–312

  10. Gockley R, Forlizzi J, Simmons R (2006) Interactions with a moody robot. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 186–193

  11. Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1–2):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi K, Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Shiomi M, Koizumi S, Ishiguro H, Ogasawara T, Hagita N (2007) Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium: a field experiment at a train station. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2007, pp 137–144

  13. Walster E, Festinger L (1962) The effectiveness of “overheard” persuasive communication. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65(6):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki SV, Yamada S (2004) Persuasion through overheard communication by life-like agents. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, 2004, pp 225–231

  15. Takeuchi Y, Katagiri Y (2002) Social dynamics in Web page through inter-agent interaction. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell 17(4):439–448

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J, Kogure K (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 62(2):267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Android as a telecommunication medium with human like presence. In: Proceedings of 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2007, pp 193–200

  18. Nakanishi H, Nakazawa S, Ishida T, Takanashi K, Isbister K (2003) Can software agents influence human relations? Balance theory in agent-mediated communities. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2003, pp 717–724

  19. Sakamoto D, Ono T (2006) Sociality of robots: do robots construct or collapse human relations? In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 355–356

  20. Hayashi K, Kanda T, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2005) Robot Manzai—robots’ conversation as a passive social medium. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, 2005, pp 456–462

  21. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2004) Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots. Proc IEEE 92(11):1839–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Sakamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakamoto, D., Hayashi, K., Kanda, T. et al. Humanoid Robots as a Broadcasting Communication Medium in Open Public Spaces. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 157–169 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0015-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0015-5

Keywords

Navigation