Abstract
Introduction: As applications of robotics extend to areas that directly impact human life, such as the military and eldercare, the deployment of autonomous and semi-autonomous robots increasingly requires the input of stakeholder opinions. Up to now, technological deployment has been relying on the guidance of government/military policy and the healthcare system without specific incorporation of professional and lay opinion. Methods: This paper presents results from a roboethics study that uses the unique N-Reasons scenario-based survey instrument. The instrument collected Yes, No, Neutral responses from more than 250 expert and lay responders via the Internet along with their ethics-content reasons for the answers, allowing the respondents to agree to previously-provided reasons or to write their own. Data from three questions relating to military and eldercare robots are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: The survey reveals that respondents weigh the appropriateness of robotics technology deployment in concert with the level of autonomy conferred upon it. The accepted level of robot autonomy does not appear to be solely dependent on the perceived efficiency and effectiveness of the technology, but is subject to the robot’s relationship with the public’s principle-based reasons and the application field in focus. Conclusion: The N-Reasons instrument was effective in eliciting ethical commentary in a simple, on-line survey format and provides insights into the interactions between the issues that respondents consider across application and technology boundaries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad R, Bailey J, Danielson P (2008) Analysis of an innovative survey platform: comparison of the public’s responses to human health and salmon genomics surveys. Public Underst Sci 19(2):155–165. doi:10.1177/0963662508091806
Ahmad RA, Bailey J, Bornik Z, Danielson P, Dowlatabadi H, Levy E, Longstaff H (2006) A web-based instrument to model social norms: NERD design and results. Integr Assess 6(2):9–36
Capurro R, Nagenborg M (2009) Ethics and robotics. IOS Press, Amsterdam
Danielson P (in press) N-reasons: computer mediated ethical decision support for public participation
Danielson P. Your views. http://yourviews.ubc.ca
Danielson P (2010) Designing a machine to learn about the ethics of robotics: the N-reasons platform. Ethics Inf Technol 12(3):251–261. doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9214-x
Danielson PA (2011) Prototyping N-reasons: a computer mediated ethics machine. Cambridge University Press, New York, Chap 24
Fishkin PJS (1993) Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform. Yale University Press, New Haven
Fishkin PJS (1997) The voice of the people: public opinion and democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven
Forlizzi J, DiSalvo C, Gemperle F (2004) Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1):25–59. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_3
Goven J (2006) Dialogue, governance, and biotechnology: acknowledging the context of the conversation. Integr. Assess. 6(2):99–116
Huxley J (1946) UNESCO: its purpose and its philosophy. Public Affairs Press, Paris
Lin P, Bekey G, Abney K (2008) Autonomous military robotics: risk, ethics, and design
Moshkina L, Arkin RC Lethality and autonomous systems: survey design and results
Scharff R, Dusek V (2003) Philosophy of technology: the technological condition—an anthology. Blackwell philosophy anthologies, 1st edn. Wiley/Blackwell, Oxford
Schomberg R (2007) From the ethics of technology towards an ethics of knowledge policy: implications for robotics. AI Soc 22(3):331–348
Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2010) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
Singer PW (2009) Wired for war: the robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century, 1st edn. Penguin, Baltimore
Sparrow R (2007) Killer Robots. J Appl Philos 24(1):62–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x
Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
Sullivan MJ (2010) Defense acquisitions: DOD could achieve greater commonality and efficiencies among its unmanned aircraft systems
Takayama L, Ju W, Nass C (2008) Beyond dirty, dangerous, and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. In: Proc of human-robot interact. ACM/IEEE, Amsterdam. doi:10.1145/1349822.1349827
Tergesen A, Inada M (2010) It’s not a stuffed animal, it’s a $6,000 medical device: paro the robo-seal aims to comfort elderly, but is it ethical?
Veruggio G (2005) The Birth of Roboethics. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, workshop on roboethics. IEEE, Barcelona, pp 1–4
Whitman J (2007) The challenge to deliberative systems of technological systems convergence. Innovation. Eur J Soc Sci Res 20(4):329–342. doi:10.1080/13511610701760747
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, A., Danielson, P. & Van der Loos, H.F.M. Survey-Based Discussions on Morally Contentious Applications of Interactive Robotics. Int J of Soc Robotics 4, 77–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0120-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0120-0