Abstract
Against the background of the uncanny valley hypothesis we investigated how people react towards an android robot in a natural environment dependent on the behavior displayed by the robot (still vs. moving) in a quasi-experimental observational field study. We present data on unscripted interactions between humans and the android robot “Geminoid HI-1” in an Austrian public café and subsequent interviews. Data were analyzed with regard to the participants’ nonverbal behavior (e.g. attention paid to the robot, proximity). We found that participants’ behavior towards the android robot as well as their interview answers were influenced by the behavior the robot displayed. In addition, we found huge inter-individual differences in the participants’ behavior. Implications for the uncanny valley and research on social human–robot interactions are discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-013-0198-7/MediaObjects/12369_2013_198_Fig7_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Onishi M, Luo Z, Odashima T et al (2007) Generation of human care behaviors by human–interactive robot RI-MAN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA’07. IEEE Press, New York, pp 3128–3129
Matarić MJ, Eriksson J, Feil-Seifer DJ et al (2007) Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 4(1):5. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-4-5
Matarić MJ (2006) Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):81–83
Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1(4):319–330. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
Ceccarelli M (2011) Problems and issues for service robots in new applications. Int J Soc Robot 3(3):299–312. doi:10.1007/s12369-011-0097-8
Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, Jayawardena C et al (2013) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0186-y
Matsumoto N, Fujii H, Okada M (2006) Minimal design for human–agent communication. Artif Life Robot 10(1):49–54. doi:10.1007/s10015-005-0377-1
Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A et al (2006) Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human–robot interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2006), pp 469–474
Ishiguro H (2006) Interactive humanoids and androids as ideal interfaces for humans. In: Paris CL, Sidner CL, Edmonds E et al (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, IUI ’06. ACM Press, New York, pp 2–9
Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35
MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact Stud 7(3):297–337. doi:10.1075/is.7.3.03mac
MacDorman KF (2006) Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familarity, and eeriness: an exploration of the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the cog sci 2006 workshop on android science, pp 26–29
Hanson D, Olney A, Pereira IA et al (2005) Upending the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 20, pp 1728–1729
Brenton M, Gillies M, Ballin D et al (2005) The uncanny valley: does it exist? In: Proceedings of the conference of human computer interaction, workshop on human animated character interaction
Hanson D (2006) Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the cog sci 2006 workshop on android science, pp 16–20
Pollick FE (2010) In search of the uncanny valley. In: Daras P, Ibarra OM (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on user centric media, UCMedia 2009, Venice, Italy, December 9–11, 2009. Revised selected papers. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–78
Gee FC, Browne WN, Kawamura K (2005) Uncanny valley revisited. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE workshop ro-man, pp 151–157
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H et al (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2007), pp 368–373
Shimada M, Minato T, Itakura S et al (2006) Evaluation of android using unconscious recognition. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2006), pp 157–162. doi:10.1109/ICHR.2006.321378
Minato T, Shimada M, Itakura S et al (2005) Does gaze reveal the human likeness of an android? In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on development and learning, pp 106–111
Minato T, Shimada M, Itakura S et al (2006) Evaluating the human likeness of an android by comparing gaze behaviors elicited by the android and a person. Adv Robot 20(10):1147–1163. doi:10.1163/156855306778522505
von der Pütten AM, Eimler SC, Krämer NC (2011) Living with a robot companion. empirical study on the interaction with an artificial health advisor. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI’11. ACM Press, New York, pp 327–334
Sung J (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’09. ACM Press, New York, pp 45–52
Sung J, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2010) Domestic robot ecology. Int J Soc Robot. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0065-8
Weiss A, Igelsböck J, Tscheligi M et al (2010) Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI 2010. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 23–30
Hayashi K, Sakamoto D, Kanda T et al (2007) Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium. In: Breazeal CL, Schultz AC, Fong T et al (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’07. ACM, New York, pp 137–144
Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H et al (2007) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. Intell Syst 22(2):25–32
Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N et al (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):962–971. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.904904
Bartneck C, Takayuki K, Ishiguro H et al (2009) My robotic doppelgänger—a critical look at the uncanny valley theory. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2009), pp 269–276
Mori M, MacDorman K, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(2):98–100. doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
Hara F (2004) Artificial emotion of face robot through learning in communicative interactions with human. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, (RO-MAN 2004), pp 7–15. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374712
Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R et al (2007) Exploring the design space of robot appearance and behavior in an attention-seeking ‘Living room’ scenario for a robot companion. In: IEEE symposium on artificial life (ALIFE ’07), pp 341–347. doi:10.1109/ALIFE.2007.367815
Kanda T, Miyashita T, Osada T et al (2008) Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 24(3):725–735. doi:10.1109/TRO.2008.921566
Tondu B, Bardou N (2011) A new interpretation of Mori’s uncanny valley for future humanoid robots. Int J Robot Autom. doi:10.2316/Journal.206.2011.3.206-3348
Gray K, Wegner DM (2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1):125–130. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007
McDorman KF (2005) Mortality salience and the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 399–405
Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S et al (1990) Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(2):308–318. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
Ho C, MacDorman KF, Pramono Z (2008) Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and isomap analysis of robot video ratings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2008), pp 169–176
Noma M, Saiwaki N, Itakura S et al (2006) Composition and evaluation of the humanlike motions of an android. In: 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 163–168
Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(336):433–460
French RM (1990) Subcognition and the limits of the TuringTest. Mind XCIX(393):53–65. doi:10.1093/mind/XCIX.393.53
Straub I, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2010) Incorporated identity in interaction with a teleoperated android robot: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp 119–144. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598695
Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference of human factors in computing systems (CHI 1994), pp 72–78
Nass C, Moon Y, Morkes J et al (1997) Computers are social actors: a review of current research. In: Friedman B (ed) Human values and the design of computer technology, vol 72. CSLI Publications, Cambridge, pp 137–162
Ramey CH (2006) An inventory of reported characteristics for home computers, robots, and human beings: applications for android science and the uncanny valley. In: MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (eds) Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium “Toward social mechanisms of android science”, pp 21–25
Becker-Asano C, Ogawa K, Nishio S et al (2010) Exploring the uncanny valley with geminoid HI-1 in a real world application. In: Blashki K (ed) Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on interfaces and human computer interaction, IHCI 2010, pp 121–128
Ortony A, Norman D, Revelle W (2005) Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous J, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions: the brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 173–202
Cowley JS, McDorman KF (2006) What baboons, babies, and Tetris players tell us about interaction: a biosocial view of norm-based social learning. Connect Sci 18(4):363–378
Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston PH (ed) The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 211–277
Ramey CH (2005) The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. In: Proceedings of views of the uncanny valley workshop: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 8–13
Rozin P, Fallon AE (1987) A perspective on disgust. Psychol Rev 94(1):23–41
Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley C et al (1999) Individual differences in disgust sensitivity: comparisons and evaluations of paper-and-pencil versus behavioral measures. J Res Pers 33(3):330–351
Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A et al (2006) The art of designing robot faces—dimensions for human–robot interaction. In: Goodrich MA, Schultz AC, Bruemmer DJ (eds) Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI/SIGART 2nd conference on human robot interaction (HRI2006). ACM, New York, pp 321–332
Nass C, Fogg BJ, Moon Y (1996) Can computers be teammates? Int J Hum-Comput Stud 45:669–678
von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC (2012) A survey on robot appearances. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2012), pp 267–268
Nishio S, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Geminoid: teleoperated android of an existing person. In: de Pina Filho AC (ed) Humanoid Robots: New Developments. I-Tech Education and Publishing, Rijeka, pp 343–352
OpenCV Wiki FaceDetection. http://opencv.willowgarage.com/wiki/FaceDetection
Wittenburg P, Brugman H, Russel A et al (2006) Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In: Proceedings of language resources and evaluation conference (LREC)
Hall ET (1982) The hidden dimension. An anthropologist examines humans’ use of space in public and private. Anchor, New York
Hall ET (1974) Handbook for proxemics research. In: Society for the anthropology of visual communication, Washington DC
Howell DC (2010) Statistical methods for psychology, 7th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a doctoral fellowship of the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes (German National Academic Foundation), by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S), KAKENHI (20220002) and a post-doctoral fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C., Becker-Asano, C. et al. The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human–Android Interaction in the Field. Int J of Soc Robotics 6, 67–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0198-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0198-7