Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Variable Spring Balance Position Impedance Control for a Complex Docking Structure

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a complex multi-peg-on-hole docking mechanism used to attach extravehicular experiment loads to a space station and analyzes the challenges of force compliance control for this mechanism. The influence caused by the spring term in impedance control on the complex multi-peg-on-hole docking is analyzed. The analysis shows that the spring term can avoid the posture adjusting error, at the same time it can also generate impedance force and make vibration during the docking process. Focusing on the effects caused by spring term, this paper expends the spring term of classical impedance control. The classical spring term with two input parameters which only considers the original terminal position and actual terminal position is expanded to three parameters. The real expected position is also considered. This third parameter cannot be predicted because of the random error, this paper proposes a prediction method based on the forgetting factor function. This method can predict and adjust this parameter during the whole docking process, so it decreases the impedance force caused by spring term effectively, meanwhile the positive effect by spring term remains. So the proposed method can achieve the docking task and limit contact force and vibration effectively. At last, on the basis of the existing space robot system and preliminary completed work, detailed docking task experiments were conducted. The experiment results demonstrated that the proposed control method was feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Everitt CWF, De Bra DB, Parkinson BW (2011) Gravity probe B: final results of a space experiment to test general relativity. Phys Rev Lett 106(22):221101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbs G, Sachdev S (2002) Canada and the international space station program: overview and status. Acta Astronaut 51(2):591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakawa Y, Matsuno F, Fukushima S (1985) Modeling and feedback control of a flexible arm. J Robot Syst 2(4):453–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Low KH (1987) A systematic formulation of dynamic equations for robot manipulators with elastic links. J Robot Syst 4(3):435–456

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu LY, Lin HC (2013) Tip-contact force control of a single-link flexible arm using feedback and parallel compensation approach. Robotica 31:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Schutter J, Van Brussel H (1988) Compliant robot motion 2. A control approach based on external control loops. Int J Robot Res 7(4):18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siciliano B, Sciavicco L, Villani L, Oriolo G (2009) Robotics: modeling, planning and control. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman WS, Zhao Y, Pao YH (2001) Interpretation of force and moment signals for compliant peg-in-hole assembly. In: Robotics and automation. Proceedings 2001 ICRA, vol 1, pp 571–576

  9. Shirinzadeh B, Zhong Y, Tilakaratna PDW et al (2011) A hybrid contact state analysis methodology for robotic-based adjustment of cylindrical pair. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vishnu M, Duygun E, Nilanjan S (2007) A new method of force control for unknown environments. Int J Adv Robot Syst 4(3):313–322

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chiaverini S, Sciavicco L, Villani B (1993) The parallel approach to force/position control of robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 4:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiaverini S, Sciavicco L, Villani B (1994) Force/position regulation of compliant robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 39:647–652

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuno F, Sakawa Y, Asano T (1991) Quasi-static hybrid-position/force control of a flexible manipulator. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Sacramento, pp 2838–2842

  14. Whitney DE (1987) Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control. Int J Robot Res 6(3):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strip DR (1988) Insertions using geometric analysis and hybrid force-position control: method and analysis. In: Proceedings on robotics and automation, 1988. pp 1744–1751

  16. Mason MT (1981) Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 11(6):418–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruzzone LE, Molfino RM, Zoppi M (2002) Modelling and control of peg-in-hole assembly performed by a translational robot. In: Proceedings of the international conference modeling identification and control, pp 512–517

  18. Tsumugiwa T, Sakamoto A, Yokogawa R et al (2003) Switching control of position/torque control for human-robot cooperative task-human-robot cooperative carrying and peg-in-hole task. In: Proceeding of ICRA International Conference on IEEE, vol 2 pp 1933–1939

  19. Caccavale F, Natale C, Siciliano B et al (2001) Achieving a cooperative behavior in a dual-arm robot system via a modular control structure. J Robot Syst 18(12):691–699

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogan N (1987) Impedance control: an approach to manipulation part I, part II, part III. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siciliano B, Villani L (2000) Robot force control. Kluwer, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman RE, Bajo A, Simaan N (2013) Algorithms for autonomous exploration and estimation in compliant environments. Robotica 31(01):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanisic RZ, Fernández AV (2012) Adjusting the parameters of the mechanical impedance for velocity, impact and force control. Robotica 30(04):583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zotovic R, Fernandez AV, Garcıa-Gil PJ (2005) Impact and force control with switching between mechanical impedance parameters. In: Proceedings of the 16th IFAC world congress, Prague, pp 169–174

  25. Ranko RZ, Fernandez AV (2009) Simultaneous velocity, impact and force control. Robotica 27(7):1039–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Broenink JF, Tiernego MLJ (1996) Peg-in-hole assembly using impedance control with a 6 DOF robot. In: Proceedings 8th european simulation symposium, pp 24–26

  27. Dubowsky S, Durfee W, Corrigan T, Kuklinski A, Muller U (1994) A laboratory test bed for space robotics: the VES II. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems, Munich, pp 1562–1569

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Grant 2011AA040202, Grant 2015AA043101, and 2015BAF10B02 (National High Technology Research of China), Basic Scientific Research (Grand No. B2220133017), Grants 61503029, 61573063 and 61305112 (National Natural Science Foundation of China).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, B., Li, H., Dong, Q. et al. An Improved Variable Spring Balance Position Impedance Control for a Complex Docking Structure. Int J of Soc Robotics 8, 619–629 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0344-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0344-0

Keywords

Navigation