Abstract
The aim of this study is to synthesize the existing literature on hospital hygiene and robotic animals to provide researchers and professionals that use robotic animals in this environment with tools and guidelines. The conducted literature review leads to the conclusion that cleaning procedures reported in the included studies and hygienic guidelines cannot be applied to currently available robotic animals due to excessive use of water, disinfectants and high temperatures. This study consequently raises questions about the application of these robotic animals in more vulnerable populations and adds to the understanding of the required conditions for robotic animals if being developed to be used in healthcare institutions.
References
Salter T, Werry I, Michaud F (2008) Going into the wild in child-robot interaction studies: issues in social robotic development. Intell Serv Robot 1(2):93–108
Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2):94–103
Heerink M (2008) Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction ACM
Heerink M et al (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):361–375
Stanton CM (2008) Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. IEEE
Kahn Jr PH (2004) Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. In: CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, ACM
Tamura T et al (2004) Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? J Gerontol Ser 59(1):M83–M85
Stiehl WD (2005) Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In: Robot and human interactive communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication
Larriba F (2015) Externalising moods and psychological states to smooth pet-robot/child interaction through bluetooth communication. In: Husai SA, Husai K, Paciello F (eds) Bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. Springer, Granada, pp 683–693
Santos KBD (2012) The Huggable: a socially assistive robot for pediatric care. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
New Pals (2015) http://www.newfriends.nu/eng/projects-workshops-2/new-pals/. Accessed 14 Nov 2015
InnvoLabs. What is Pleo rb? http://www.pleoworld.com/pleo_rb/eng/lifeform.php. Accessed 14 Nov 2015
Ibfelt T et al (2015) Effect of cleaning and disinfection of toys on infectious diseases and micro-organisms in daycare nurseries. J Hosp Infect 89(2):109–115
Avila-Aguero MaL (2004) Toys in a pediatric hospital: are they a bacterial source? Am J Infect Control 32(5):287–290
Kamhuka LN, Rees G (2013) Successful control of a vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) outbreak on a pediatric ward—do not forget the toys cited in scopus. 4
Merriman E, Corwin P, Ikram R (2002) Toys are a potential source of cross-infection in general practitioners’ waiting rooms. Br J Gen Pract 52(475):138–140
Naesens R et al (2009) Washing toys in a neonatal intensive care unit decreases bacterial load of potential pathogens. J Hosp Infect 71(2):197–198
Subramanian B et al (2014) Empathy dolls: are they a source of cross-contamination between patients? J Hosp Infect 87(1):50–53
Fleming K, Randle J (2006) Toys-friend or foe? A study of infection risk in a paediatric intensive care unit. Paediatri Nurs 18(4):14–18
Rogers M et al (2000) Rotavirus outbreak on a pediatric oncology floor: possible association with toys. Am J Infect Control 28(5):378–380
Hanrahan KS, Lofgren M (2004) Evidence based practice: examining the risks of toys in the microenvironment of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care 4(4):184–201
Pelgrim M Een uitbraak van gastro-enteritis in een kinderdagverblijf: de belangrijkste evidence-based hygiëneadviezen op een rij. Infectieziekten Bull 229
Hygiënerichtlijnen voor Medische Kinderdagverblijven en Boddaertcentra: Semi-residentieel (2009) Landelijk Centrum Hygiëne en Veiligheid. Amsterdam
Control IPA (2009) Toys and toy cleaning. SHR Regional Infection Prevention and Control Executive Committee
Guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, in MMWR. Recommendations and reports: morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports/Centers for Disease Control (2000) Centers for Disease Control Prevention. The Infectious Disease Society American Society of Blood and Marrow
Veilig werken in de kindergeneeskunde (2004) Werkgroep Infectie Preventie Leiden
Flevoziekenhuis (2012) Infectiepreventie Richtlijn Reiniging en desinfectie. Flevoziekenhuis, Almere
Sociale robot PARO-gebruikershandleiding. Focal Meditech B.V., Tilburg
Hasbro (2003) FurReal friends instruction manual
Pleo rb handleiding (2010) Innvo Labs Limited, Hong Kong
User’s Manual–JustoCat (2014) Robyn Robotics, AB. Västerås, Sweden
Acknowledgments
This research is part of the New Palls (‘Nieuwe Maatjes’) project, which is financed by the SIA-RAAK program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Furthermore we want to express our gratitude to the staff at the Flevo Hospital in Almere for their cooperation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scholten, T.S., Vissenberg, C. & Heerink, M. Hygiene and the Use of Robotic Animals in Hospitals: A Review of the Literature. Int J of Soc Robotics 8, 499–511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0367-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0367-6