Abstract
Robots have been gradually leaving laboratory and factory environments and moving into human populated environments. Various social robots have been developed with the ability to exhibit social behaviors and collaborate with non-expert users in different situations. In order to increase the degree of collaboration between humans and the robots in human–robot joint action systems, these robots need to achieve higher levels of interaction with humans. However, many social robots are operated under teleoperation modes or pre-programmed scenarios. Based on homeostatic drive theory, this paper presents the development of a novel collaborative behavior controller for social robots to jointly perform tasks with users in human–robot interaction (HRI) experiments. Manual work during the experiments is reduced, and the experimenters can focus more on the interaction. We propose a hybrid concept for the behavior decision-making process, which combines the hierarchical approach and parallel-rooted, ordered, slip-stack hierarchical architecture. Emotions are associated with behaviors by using the two-dimensional space model of valence and arousal. We validate the usage of the behavior controller by a joint attention HRI scenario in which the NAO robot and a therapist jointly interact with children.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
NAOqi is the name of the main software running on NAO which is used to control the robot.
References
Aldebaran robotics: Datasheet NAO Next Gen - H21/H25 Model - English version (2012). https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/sites/aldebaran/files/datasheet_nao_next_gen_en.pdf
Andrist S, Tan XZ, Gleicher M, Mutlu B (2014) Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 25–32
Anzalone SM, Tilmont E, Boucenna S, Xavier J, Jouen AL, Bodeau N, Maharatna K, Chetouani M, Cohen D, Group MS et al (2014) How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3d+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res Autism Spectr Disord 8(7):814–826
Arkin RC (1998) Behavior-based robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Arkin RC, Fujita M, Takagi T, Hasegawa R (2003) An ethological and emotional basis for human–robot interaction. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):191–201
Bekele E, Crittendon JA, Swanson A, Sarkar N, Warren ZE (2014) Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism 18(5):598–608
Berridge KC (2004) Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol Behav 81(2):179–209
Breazeal C (2004) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bryson J (2003) Action selection and individuation in agent based modelling. In: Proceedings of agent, pp 317–330
Bryson JJ (2001) Intelligence by design: principles of modularity and coordination for engineering complex adaptive agents. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M Jr, Aljunied SM (2013) Why robots? a survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):593–618
Campbell N, Reece J (2008) Biology. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco
Cañamero L (2003) Designing emotions for activity selection in autonomous agents. Emot Hum Artifacts 115:148
Cannon WB (1932) The wisdom of the body. Am J Med Sci 184(6):864
Cao HL, Esteban PG, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Simut R, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Toward a platform-independent social behavior architecture for multiple therapeutic scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on social robots in therapy and education
Charman T (2003) Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism? Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358(1430):315–324
Chernova S, DePalma N, Morant E, Breazeal C (2011) Crowdsourcing human–robot interaction: application from virtual to physical worlds. In: RO-MAN, 2011 IEEE. IEEE, pp 21–26
Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. GP Putnam Sons, New York
Dautenhahn K (2007) Methodology and themes of human-robot interaction: a growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst 4(1):15
De Beir A, Cao HL, Esteban PG, Van de Perre G, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2016) Enhancing emotional facial expressiveness on NAO. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):513–521
De Beir A, Cao HL, Esteban PG, Van de Perre G, Vanderborght B (2015) Enhancing NAO expression of emotions using pluggable eyebrows. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on social robots in therapy and education
Deak GO, Flom RA, Pick AD (2000) Effects of gesture and target on 12-and 18-month-olds’ joint visual attention to objects in front of or behind them. Dev Psychol 36(4):511
Ekman P (1992) Are there basic emotions? Psychol Rev 99(3):550–553
Feil-Seifer D, Mataric M (2008) Robot-assisted therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children. ACM, pp 49–52
Fellous JM, Arbib MA (2005) Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):143–166
Gómez Esteban P, Cao HL, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2016) A multilayer reactive system for robots interacting with children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interaction
Hull CL (1943) Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory Appleton-Century, New York
Lazzeri N, Mazzei D, Zaraki A, De Rossi D (2013) Towards a believable social robot. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–395
Leka S, Jain A et al (2010) Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. World Health Organization, Geneva
Loveland K, Landry S (1986) Joint attention and language in autism and developmental language delay. J Autism Dev Disord 16(3):335–349
Maes P (1991) A bottom-up mechanism for behaviour selection in an artificial creature. In: Meyer J, Wilson S (eds) From animals to animats: proceedings of the first international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 478–485
Malfaz M, Castro-González Á, Barber R, Salichs MA (2011) A biologically inspired architecture for an autonomous and social robot. IEEE Trans Auton Mental Dev 3(3):232–246
Mazzei D, Cominelli L, Lazzeri N, Zaraki A, De Rossi D (2014) I-clips brain: a hybrid cognitive system for social robots. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–224
Mook DG (1987) Motivation: the organization of action. W. W. Norton and Company, New York
Mundy P, Delgado C, Block J, Venezia M, Hogan A, Seibert J (2003) Early social communication scales (ESCS). University of Miami, Coral Gables
Mundy P, Gomes A (1998) Individual differences in joint attention skill development in the second year. Infant Behav Dev 21(3):469–482
Norman DA, Ortony A, Russell DM (2003) Affect and machine design: lessons for the development of autonomous machines. IBM Syst J 42(1):38–44
Ortony A, Norman D, Revelle W (2005) Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous J-M, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–202
Owen-DeSchryver JS, Carr EG, Cale SI, Blakeley-Smith A (2008) Promoting social interactions between students with autism spectrum disorders and their peers in inclusive school settings. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 23(1):15–28
Van de Perre G, Van Damme M, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Development of a generic method to generate upper-body emotional expressions for different social robots. Adv Robot 29(9):597–609
Posner J, Russell J, Peterson B (2005) The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 17(3):715–734
Proetzsch M, Luksch T, Berns K (2010) Development of complex robotic systems using the behavior-based control architecture iB2C. Robot Auton Syst 58(1):46–67
Read R, Belpaeme T (2014) Situational context directs how people affectively interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 41–48
Riek LD (2012) Wizard of oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):119–136
Riek LD (2015) Robotics technology in mental health care. Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. Academic Press, p 185
Robins B, Dickerson P, Stribling P, Dautenhahn K (2004) Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism. Interact Stud 5(2):161–198
Saldien J, Goris K, Vanderborght B, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D (2010) Expressing emotions with the social robot probo. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):377–389
Saldien J, Vanderborght B, Goris K, Van Damme M, Lefeber D (2014) A motion system for social and animated robots. Int J Adv Robot Syst 11(5):72
Schertz HH, Odom SL (2007) Promoting joint attention in toddlers with autism: a parent-mediated developmental model. J Autism Dev Disord 37(8):1562–1575
Schietecatte I, Roeyers H, Warreyn P (2012) Exploring the nature of joint attention impairments in young children with autism spectrum disorder: associated social and cognitive skills. J Autism Dev Disord 42(1):1–12
Sloman A, Logan B (2000) Evolvable architectures for human-like minds. In: Affective minds. Elsevier
Sloman A et al (2001) Beyond shallow models of emotion. Cogn Process Int Q Cogn Sci 2(1):177–198
Sosnowski S, Bittermann A, Kuhnlenz K, Buss M (2006) Design and evaluation of emotion-display EDDIE. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp 3113–3118
Thill S, Pop CA, Belpaeme T, Ziemke T, Vanderborght B (2012) Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: challenges and outlook. Paladyn 3(4):209–217
Thomaz AL, Breazeal C (2008) Teachable robots: understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artif Intell 172(6):716–737
Velásquez JD (1997) Modeling emotions and other motivations in synthetic agents. In: AAAI/IAAI. Citeseer, pp 10–15
Vouloutsi V, Lallée S, Verschure PF (2013) Modulating behaviors using allostatic control. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–298
Wada K, Shibata T (2006) Robot therapy in a care house-its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. IEEE, pp 3966–3971
Warren Z, Zheng Z, Swanson A, Bekele E, Zhang L, Crittendon J, Weitlauf A, Sarkar N (2013) Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills? J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3726–3734
Whalen C, Schreibman L (2003) Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(3):456–468
Zheng Z, Zhang L, Bekele E, Swanson A, Crittendon JA, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2013) Impact of robot-mediated interaction system on joint attention skills for children with autism. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE, pp 1–8
Zubrycki I, Granosik G (2016) Understanding therapists needs and attitudes towards robotic support. The Roboterapia project. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):553–563
Acknowledgements
The work leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission 7th Framework Program as a part of the project DREAM Grant No. 611391. Greet Van de Perre is funded by the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO), Flanders. Ramona Simut is funded by the Government agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT), Flanders. Robotics and Multibody Mechanics Research Group is partner of the Agile and Human Centered Production and Robotic Systems Research Priority of Flanders Make. The authors would like to thank the therapists from Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Belgium) and Babes-Bolyai University (Romania) for their contributions to the system validation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, HL., Gómez Esteban, P., Albert, D.B. et al. A Collaborative Homeostatic-Based Behavior Controller for Social Robots in Human–Robot Interaction Experiments. Int J of Soc Robotics 9, 675–690 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0405-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0405-z