Abstract
Trust is an important factor in human-robot interaction, it plays an important role in improving human acceptance of robots and building human-robot relationships. Today, when robots are more intelligent and the human-robot relationships is more intimate, the social attributes of robots and interaction scenarios are important factors affecting human-robot trust. Altruistic behaviour is a typical social behaviour, and reciprocity is a typical social interaction scenario. So, this study investigates the effects of reciprocity and robots’ altruistic behaviours on cognitive trust, emotional trust, behavioural trust and the mediating role of perceived intelligence. An experiment involving 42 participants was conducted. The virtual robots used in the experiment have three different behaviours: altruistic, selfish and control, and two interactive scenarios in the experiment: reciprocity and non-reciprocity. Participants in our study played the adapted Repeated Public Goods Game and the Trust Game with robot in two scenarios. The results indicate that robots’ altruistic behaviours significantly influence participants’ cognitive trust, emotional trust and behavioural trust, and reciprocity significantly influences only emotional trust and behavioural trust. Both robots’ altruistic behaviours and reciprocity positively influence perceived intelligence. Perceived intelligence mediates the effects of robots’ altruistic behaviours on cognitive and emotional trust and the effect of reciprocity on emotional trust. Implications are discussed for future work.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-022-00899-6/MediaObjects/12369_2022_899_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-022-00899-6/MediaObjects/12369_2022_899_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-022-00899-6/MediaObjects/12369_2022_899_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-022-00899-6/MediaObjects/12369_2022_899_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12369-022-00899-6/MediaObjects/12369_2022_899_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JY, De Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
Lee JJ, Knox B, Baumann J, Breazeal C, DeSteno D (2013) Computationally modeling interpersonal trust. Front Psychol 4:893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00893
Haring KS, Matsumoto Y, Watanabe K (2013) How do people perceive and trust a lifelike robot. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, San Francisco, USA, pp 1–6
Sale, M, Lakatos G, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2015) Would you trust a (faulty) robot? Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In: 10th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 1–8.
McAllister DJ (1995) Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38(1):24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727
Schaubroeck J, Lam SS, Peng AC (2011) Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. J Appl Psychol 96(4):863. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022625
Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev 25(2):161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Fogg BJ, Nass C (1997) How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behavior change. In: CHI'97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, NewYork, NY, USA, pp 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120419
Lee SA, Liang Y (2016) The role of reciprocity in verbally persuasive robots. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 19(8):524–527. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0124
Salem M, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2011) A friendly gesture: investigating the effect of multimodal robot behavior in human-robot interaction. In: 2011 Ro-Man, IEEE, pp 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005285
Häring M, Eichberg J, André E (2012) Studies on grounding with gaze and pointing gestures in human-robot-interaction. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, Singapore, pp 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_38
Bartneck C, Croft E, Kulic D (2008) Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. In: Proceedings of the metrics for human-robot interaction workshop in affiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2008), Technical Report 471, Amsterdam, pp 37-44. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5154805
Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228736
Bainbridge WA, Hart JW, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2011) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robotics 3(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7
Batson CD, Powell AA (2003) Altruism and prosocial behavior. Handb Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA (2005) Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu Rev Psychol 56:365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
Leider S, Möbiu MM, Rosenblat T, Do Q-A (2009) Directed altruism and enforced reciprocity in social networks. Q J Econ 124(4):1815–1851. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1815
Jordan JJ, Rand DG, Arbesman S, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2013) Contagion of cooperation in static and fluid social networks. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066199
Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2009) Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown Spark
Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2010) Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(12):5334–5338. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913149107
Hill AL, Rand DG, Nowak MA, Christakis NA (2010) Emotions as infectious diseases in a large social network: the SISa model. Proc Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 277(1701):3827–3835. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1217
Hill AL, Rand DG, Nowak MA, Christakis NA (2010) Infectious disease modeling of social contagion in networks. PLoS Comput Biol 6(11):e1000968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000968
Keser C, Van Winden F (2000) Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand J Econ 102(1):23–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00182
Kocher MG, Cherry T, Kroll S, Netzer RJ, Sutter M (2008) Conditional cooperation on three continents. Econ Lett 101(3):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.07.015
Imre M, Oztop E, Nagai Y, Ugur E (2019) Affordance-based altruistic robotic architecture for human-robot collaboration. Adapt Behav 27(4):223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712318824697
Correia F, Mascarenhas SF, Gomes S et al (2019) Exploring prosociality in human-robot teams. In: 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673299
Yasumatsu Y, Sono T, Hasegawa K, Imai M (2017) I can help you: Altruistic behaviors from children towards a robot at a kindergarten. In: Proceedings of the companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038305
De Kleijn R, van Es L, Kachergis G, Hommel B (2019) Anthropomorphization of artificial agents leads to fair and strategic, but not altruistic behavior. Int J Hum Comput Stud 122:168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008
Nishio S, Ogawa K, Kanakogi Y, Itakura S, Ishiguro H (2018) Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the ultimatum game. In: Geminoid Studies, Springer, Singapore, pp 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8702-8_16
Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3–4):177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3
Fehr E, Gächter S (1998) Reciprocity and economics: the economic implications of homo reciprocans. Eur Econ Rev 42(3–5):845–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00131-1
Hsieh TY, Chaudhury B, Cross ES (2020) Human-Robot Cooperation in prisoner dilemma games: people behave more reciprocally than prosocially toward robots. In: companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378309
Luria M (2018) Designing robot personality based on fictional sidekick characters. In: companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 307–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176912
Fraune MR, Oisted BC, Sembrowski CE, Gates KA, Krupp MM, Šabanović S (2020) Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Comput Hum Behav 105:106220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106220
Muscolo GG, Recchiuto CT, Campatelli G, Molfino R (2013) A robotic social reciprocity in children with autism spectrum disorder. In: 5th international conference on social robotics, ICSR, pp 574–575.
Sandoval EB, Brandstetter J, Obaid M, Bartneck C (2016) Reciprocity in human-robot interaction: a quantitative approach through the prisoner’s dilemma and the ultimatum game. Int J Soc Robotics 8(2):303–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0323-x
Broadbent E, Peri K, Kerse N, Jayawardena C, Kuo I, Datta C, MacDonald B (2014) Robots in older people’s homes to improve medication adherence and quality of life: a randomised cross-over trial. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, Cham, pp 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_7
Kahn PH, Friedman B, Perez-Granados DR, Freier NG (2006) Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interact Stud 7(3):405–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986087
Kiesler S, Sproull L, Waters K (1996) A prisoner’s dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.47
Sandoval EB, Brandstatter J, Yalcin U, Bartneck C (2020) Robot likeability and reciprocity in human robot interaction: using ultimatum game to determinate reciprocal likeable robot strategies. Int J Soc Robot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00658-5
Chidambaram V, Chiang YH, Mutlu B (2012) Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157798
Stoll B, Edwards C, Edwards A (2016) “Why aren’t you a sassy little thing”: the effects of robot-enacted guilt trips on credibility and consensus in a negotiation. Commun Stud 67(5):530–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1215339
Fogg B, Nass C (1997) How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behavior change. In: CHI ’97 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’97. ACM, New York, pp 331–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120419
Dunn J, Ruedy NE, Schweitzer ME (2012) It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 117(1):2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.001
Billing DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JY, Hancock PA (2012) Human-robot interaction: developing trust in robots. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157709
Chen M, Nikolaidis S, Soh H, Hsu D, Srinivasa S (2018) Planning with trust for human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171264
Freedy A, DeVisser E, Weltman G, Coeyman N (2007) Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In: 2007 international symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, IEEE, pp 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2007.4621745
Komiak SY, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Q 30(4):941–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760
Van Den Brule R, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DH, Haselager P (2014) Do robot performance and behavioral style affect human trust? Int J Soc Robot 6(4):519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0231-5
Antos D, De Melo C, Gratch J, Grosz B (2011) The influence of emotion expression on perceptions of trustworthiness in negotiation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, San Francisco, CA, pp 772–778. https://dl.acm.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.5555/2900423.2900546
Schaefer KE (2013) The perception and measurement of humanrobot trust. Doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida
Gompei T, Umemuro H (2018) Factors and development of cognitive and affective trust on social robots. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, Cham, pp 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_5
Haring KS, Silvera-Tawil D, Matsumoto Y, Velonaki M, Watanabe K (2014) Perception of an android robot in Japan and Australia: a cross-cultural comparison. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, Cham, pp 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_17
Paeng E, Wu J, Boerkoel J (2016) Human-robot trust and cooperation through a game theoretic framework. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on artificial intelligence, San Francisco, CA, pp 4246–4247. https://dl.acm.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.5555/3016387.3016539
Deligianis C, Stanton CJ, McGarty C, Stevens CJ (2017) The impact of intergroup bias on trust and approach behaviour towards a humanoid robot. J Human-Robot Interact 6(3):4–20. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Deligianis
Williams MA (2012) Robot social intelligence. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_5
Albrecht K (2006) Social intelligence: the new science of success. Hoboken, New Jersey
Johnston B, Williams MA (2009) Autonomous learning of commonsense simulations. In: Commonsense 2009-Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on logical formalizations of commonsense reasoning, pp 73–78
Mirnig N, Stollnberger G, Miksch M et al (2017) To Err Is Robot: how humans assess and act toward an erroneous social Robot. Front Robot AI 4:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00021
Ragni M, Rudenko A, Kuhnert B, Arras KO (2016) Errare humanum est: Erroneous robots in human-robot interaction. In: 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745164
Churamani N, Anton P, Brügger M et al (2017) The impact of personalisation on human-robot interaction in learning scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human agent interaction, ACM, pp 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125756
Punyatoya P (2019) Effects of cognitive and affective trust on online customer behavior. Mark Intell Plan 37(1):80–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2018-0058
Barclay P (2004) Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Evol Hum Behav 25(4):209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002
Yamakawa T, Okano Y, Saijo T (2016) Detecting motives for cooperation in public goods experiments. Exp Econ 19(2):500–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9451-2
DeVellis RF (2016) Scale development: theory and applications. Los Angeles, USA
Clark J (2002) Recognizing large donations to public goods: an experimental test. Manag Decis Econ 23(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1044
Johnson D, Grayson K (2005) Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J Bus Res 58(4):500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00140-1
Correia F, Mascarenhas S, Prada R, Melo FS, Paiva A (2018) Group-based emotions in teams of humans and robots. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 261–269. https://dl.acm.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171252
Toumbourou JW (2016) Beneficial action within altruistic and prosocial behavior. Rev Gen Psychol 20(3):245–258
Van Den Bos W, van Dijk E, Westenberg M, Rombouts SA, Crone EA (2009) What motivates repayment? neural correlates of reciprocity in the trust game. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 4(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp009
Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2008) Representative trust and reciprocity: prevalence and determinants. Econ Inq 46(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00082.x
Wang L, Rau PLP, Evers V, Robinson BK, Hinds P (2010) When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In: The 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734578
Evers V, Maldonado H, Brodecki T, Hinds P (2008) Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In: 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349856
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Social Science Fund and Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Additionally, we wish to thank the other members in the college of Economics and Management for their useful advice and good ideas. Availability of data and material The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding. author on reasonable request.
Funding
This study was funded by a Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project (19YJC840002), a National Natural Science Foundation of China (71942005), a Beijing Social Science Fund (17SRC021) and a Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71532003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, N., Zhai, Y. & Liu, X. The Effects of Robots’ Altruistic Behaviours and Reciprocity on Human-robot Trust. Int J of Soc Robotics 14, 1913–1931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00899-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00899-6