Skip to main content
Log in

Congested multimodal transit network design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The planning of transit services is vital to transit-oriented metropolises. It is a complex, multi-objective decision process, especially for services operated by the private sector. Traveler’s desire for direct, affordable, and quality services often conflicts with the profit-making objective of private operators. In a multi-modal network, partly collaborative and partly competitive interactions among transit modes further complicate the problem. To simplify the planning problem, existing studies generally consider transit network design from the perspective of a single mode while neglecting the modal interactions. The lack of a comprehensive approach across transit modes may result in an unbalanced supply of transit services, weakening the financial viability of the services and, more importantly, adding unnecessarily to congestion, especially in already congested districts. This study explicitly considers these interactions in a multi-modal network framework. We develop a systematic phase-wise methodology for multi-modal network design, considering both the effect of congestion and integration of modal transfers. Inter-route and inter-modal transfers are modeled through the State Augmented Multi-modal (SAM) network approach developed in earlier studies. An illustrative example is included to demonstrate the design procedure and its salient features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baaj MH, Mahmassani HS (1995) Hybrid route generation heuristic algorithm for the design of transit networks. Transp Res Part C 3:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard JF (1998) Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno G, Ghiani G, Improt G (1998) A multi-modal approach to the location of a rapid transit line. Eur J Oper Res 104:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceder A, Wilson NHM (1986) Bus network design. Transp Res Part B 20:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2005) Bilevel programming: a survey. Q J Oper Res 3:87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufourd H, Gendreau M, Laporte G (1996) Locating a transit line using tabu search. Locat Sci 4:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK, Yip CW, Wan KH (2003a) Modeling transfer and nonlinear fare structure in multi-modal network. Transp Res Part B 37:149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK, Yip CW, Wan QK (2003b) Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services. In: Lam WHK, Bell MGH (eds) Advanced modeling for transit operations and service planning. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 231–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK, Yip CW, Wan QK (2004) Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services: a nested logit approach. Transp Res Part C 12:251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnanti TL, Wong RT (1984) Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms. Transp Sci 18:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis M, Schöbel A (2009, to appear) Integrating line planning, timetabling, and vehicle scheduling: a customer-oriented heuristic. Public Transp. doi:10.1007/s12469-009-0014-9

  • Nielsen OA (2000) A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions. Transp Res Part B 34:377–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattnaik SB, Mohan S, Tom VM (1998) Urban bus transit route network design using genetic algorithm. J Transp Eng 124:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea JC (1971) Designing urban transit systems: An approach to the route-technology selection problem. Report no. UMTA-URT-49(70)-71-6 by the Urban Transportation Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

  • Wan QK, Lo HK (2003) A mixed integer formulation for multiple-route transit network design. J Math Model Algorithms 2:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong K. Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wan, Q.K., Lo, H.K. Congested multimodal transit network design. Public Transp 1, 233–251 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-009-0015-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-009-0015-8

Keywords