Abstract
A hyperpath can be defined as a set of attractive lines identified by the passenger, each of which might be the optimal one from the current stop, depending on lines’ arrival time, frequency, cost etc. This concept can lead to complex route choice and has been a fundamental assumption in most transit assignment models, despite few evidence whether passengers’ indeed select such complex strategies. This research uses time series smart card data from London to investigate flexibility in buses chosen by morning commuters. The analysis is based on n-step Markov models and proposes that the variations in bus lines taken by passengers who supposedly travel between the same OD pair every morning over several days should reflect the set of paths included in an (optimal) hyperpath. Our hypothesis is that a large variation in bus lines over days indicates a complex hyperpath whereas a passenger who takes the same line every morning does not consider many alternatives. Our results suggest that there is indeed significant variation in bus lines chosen, possibly in accordance with the theory of hyperpaths in networks with uncertainty.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2006) Mining public transport user behaviour from smart card data. In: 12th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing—INCOM 2006, Saint-Etienne, France, May 1410919
Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2008) Mining smart card data from an urban transit network. In: Wang J (ed) Encyclopedia of data warehouse and mining
Andreasson I (1976) A method for the analysis of transit networks. In: Roubens M (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd European congress on operations research. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–8
Chapleau R, Trépanier M, Chu KK (2008) The ultimate survey for transit planning: complete information with smart card data and GIS. Paper presented at 8th international conference on survey in transport, Lacd’Annecy, France
De Cea J, Fernández E (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport system: an equilibrium model. Transp Sci 27(2):133–147
Fearnside K, Draper DP (1971) Public transport assignment—a new approach. Traffic Eng Control 13(7):298–299
Florian M (1977) Traffic equilibrium model of traffic by car and public transit modes. Transp Res 10:166–179
Florian M, Spiess H (1983) On two mode choice/assignment models. Transp Sci 17:32–47
Kato H, Kaneko Y, Inoue M (2010) Comparative analysis of transit assignment: evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Transp J 37(5):775–799
Kim JY, Kurauchi F, Uno N, Hagihara T, Daito T (2013) Using electronic toll collection data to understand traffic demand. J Intell Transp Syst. doi:10.1080/15472450.2013.806858 published online, 29 May 2013
Kurauchi F, Bewll MGH, Schmöcker J-D (2003) Capacity constraint transit assignment with common lines. J Math Model Algorithms 2(4):309–327
Kurauchi F, Schmöcker J-D, Fonzone A, Hassan MS, Shimamoto H, Bell MGH (2012) Estimation of weights of times and transfers for hyperpath travellers. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, 2284, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC 89–99. doi:10.3141/2284-11, 2012.10
Kusakabe T, Iryo T, Asakura Y (2010) Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behaviour with smart card transaction data. Transp J 37(5):731–740
Li D, Lin Y, Zhao X, Song H, Zou N (2011) Estimating a transit passenger trip origin-destination matrix using automatic fare collection system. In: Xu J, Yu G, Zhou S, Unland R (eds) Database systems for advanced applications. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6637. Springer, Berlin, pp 502–513
Mandl CE (1979) Evaluation and optimization of urban public transportation networks. Presented at the 3rd European congress on operations research, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2006) Analyzing the variability of transit users behaviour with smart card data. In: The 9th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems—ITSC, Toronto, Canada, 17–20 September 2006, pp 8–13
Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2007) Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transp Policy 14(3):193–203
Nguyen S, Pallottino S (1988) Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. Eur J Oper Res 37(2):176–186
Nguyen S, Pallottino S, Gendreau M (1998) Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks. Transp Sci 32(1):54–64
Nishiuchi H, Kuwahara M, Miska M, Warita H (2010) OD volume variation and its prediction based on urban expressway ETC-OD data. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on transport research, p 2095, 2010.7
Nökel K, Wekeck S (2009) Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Paper presented at 88th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC
Park JY, Kim DJ, Lim YT (2008) Use of smart card data to define public transit use in Seoul, South Korea. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 3–9. doi:10.3141/2063-01
Pelletier M, Trepanier M, Morency C (2011) Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 19:557–568
Schmöcker JD, Shimamto H, Kurauchi F (2013) Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths. Proc Soc Behav Sci 80(7):211–230
Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res 23B(2):83–102
Trépanier M, Tranchant N, Chapleau R (2007) Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. J Intell Transp Syst 11(1):1–14
Van der Hurk E, Kroon LG, Maróti G, Vervest P (2012) Dynamic forecast model of time dependent passenger flows for disruption management. Paper presented at 12th conference on advanced systems for public transport in Santiago, Santiago, Chile, 23–27 July 2012
Wardman M (2004) Public transport values of time. Transp Policy 11:363–377
Yamazaki H, Uno N, Kurauchi F (2012) The effect of a new intercity expressway based on travel time reliability using electronic toll collection data. IET Intell Transp Syst 6(3):306–317
Yang F, Liu H (2007) A new modeling framework for traveller’s day-to-day route adjustment processes. In: Allsop RE, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG (eds) Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 813–837
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research, No. 2365312, (2011–2012) from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. This research has been carried out in collaboration with the DynCapCon project headed by Prof. Michael G.H. Bell during his time at Imperial College London and Dr. Achille Fonzone (Edinburgh Napier University). We would like to thank Transport for London who kindly provided us with the Oyster card data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurauchi, F., Schmöcker, JD., Shimamoto, H. et al. Variability of commuters’ bus line choice: an analysis of oyster card data. Public Transp 6, 21–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0080-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0080-x