Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Local environmental factors in walking distance at metro stations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Walking distances to metro stations vary substantially across systems, lines and stations, but few studies have attempted to explain such variable performance. The present study examines commercial land use, intersection density, total road length, distance to the nearest metro station, theoretical catchment area and built form density (FAR) as factors to explain walking distance in a study of 14 metro stations with 43 exits in three cities. These factors explain 7.5% of the variance in walking distance, amounting to a 16% difference in territorial coverage of the station, based on Euclidean extrapolation. In addition, stations with higher levels of patronage tend to have longer walks. Walking distance can be partially explained by the presence of commerce, while intersection density is negatively related to walking distance, in contrast to some indications in the literature. Commercial land use and certain employment areas have a much higher rate of destinations than do residential areas overall. The planning standard for pedestrian catchment zones and FAR are not significant in walking distance, although both are heavily relied upon for planning metros. This study reveals that land use and urban design can be controlled to promote the local use of metro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Calculated as the total floor area of the buildings as calculated for zoning purposes, divided by the area of the legal land plot.

References

  • Badland H, Schofield G (2005) Transport, urban design and physical activity: an evidence-based update. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 10(3):177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the three Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2(3):199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Sarmiento OL, Jacoby E, Gomez LF, Neiman A (2009) Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotà. Int J Sustain Transp 3:203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Handy SL, Brownson, R, Clemente O (2006) Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. In: proc. transportation research board ann. meet., January 2006 Washington, DC, USA

  • Flyvbjerg B, Hohm M, Buhl S (2005) How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation. J Am Plan Assoc 71(2):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH, Hearst M (2007) Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud 44(4):679–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, García-Palomares JC (2008) Distance-measure impacts on the calculation of transport service areas using GIS. Environ Plan B Plan Des 35:480–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy S (2006) Questioning assumptions: do new urbanists walk more? Planning 72(1):36–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA, Rose JM, Collins AT (2011) Identifying commuter preferences for existing modes and a proposed Metro in Sydney, Australia with special reference to crowding. Public Transp 3:109–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao S, Lu J, Sterling J, Weatherford M (1997) Use of geographic information system for analysis of transit pedestrian access. Transp Res Rec 1604:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu C-I, Tsai Y-C (2014) An energy expenditure approach for estimating walking distance. Environ Plan B Plan Des 41:289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idris AO, Habib KMN, Shalaty A (2015) An investigation on the performance of mode shift models in transit ridership forecasting. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 78:551–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Zegras D, Mehndiratta S (2012) Walk the line: station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China. J Transp Geogr 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ker I, Ginn S (2003) Myths and realities in walkable catchments: the case of walking and transit. In: proceedings of the 21st ARRB and 11th REAAA conference. Transport. Our highway to a sustainable future, p 16

  • Kim KW, Lee DW, Chun YH (2010) Comparative study on the service coverages of subways and buses. KSCE J Civ Eng 14(6):915–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R, Mokhtarian PL, Laidet L (1997) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24:125–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koohsari MJ, Badland H, Giles-Corti B (2013) (Re) Designing the built environment to support physical activity: bringing public health back into urban design and planning. Cities 35:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuby M, Barranda A, Upchurch C (2004) Factors influencing light-rail boardings in the United States. Transp Res Part A 38:223–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhao P (2017) Exploring car ownership and car use in neighborhoods near metro stations in Beijing: does the neighborhood built environment matter? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 56:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Pendyala RM, Polzin SE (1998) A simulation of the effects of intermodal transfer penalties on transit use. Transp Res Rec 1623:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo BPY, Chan TH (2007) West rail and modal hierarchy in Hong Kong: some preliminary findings. In: the 12th conference of the Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, Hong Kong, 8–10 December

  • Loutzenheiser DR (1997) Pedestrian access to transit: model of walk trips and their design and urban form determinants around bay area rapid transit stations. Transp Res Rec 1604:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moniruzzaman MD, Páez A (2012) Accessibility to transit, by transit, and mode share: application of a logistic model with spatial filters. J Transp Geogr 24:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morral J, Bloger D (1996) The relationship between downtown parking supply and transit use. ITE J 66(2):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan S, Morrall J (1996) Walking distances to and from light-rail transit stations. Transp Res Rec 1538:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özgür Ö (2011) Performance analysis of rail transit investments in Turkey: istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and Bursa. Transp Policy 18(1):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa E, Bertolini L (2015) Accessibility and transit-oriented development in European metropolitan areas. J Transp Geogr 47:70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi R, Rao KV (2003) Defining transit accessibility with environmental inputs. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez DA, Khattak AJ, Evenson KR (2007) Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? Comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs. J Am Plan Assoc 72(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 93(9):1552–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghapour T, Moridpour S, Thompson RG (2016) Modeling access to public transport in urban areas. J Adv Transp 50(8):1785–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne PN (1985) Acceptable walking distances in central areas. J Transp Eng 111(4):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoup D (2005) The high cost of free parking. Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisiopiku VP, Akin D (2003) Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transp Res Part F 6:249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Zacharias J, Ma B, Oreskovic N (2016) Walking from metro: the effect of local built environment in Beijing. Cities 56:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Webster C, Chiaradia A (2017) Ungating the city: a permeability perspective. Urban Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017733943

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung H, Oh J-T (2011) Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities 28:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Fink CNY (2013) Explaining transit ridership: what has the evidence shown? Transp Lett Int J Transp Res 5(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend C, Zacharias J (2010) Built environment and pedestrian behavior at rail rapid transit stations in Bangkok. Transportation 37:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union Internationale des Transports Publics UITP (2016) Statistics brief world metro figures (pdf). http://www.uitp.org. Accessed 21 Nov 2016

  • Upchurch C, Kuby M (2014) Evaluating light rail sketch planning: actual versus predicted station boardings in Phoenix. Transportation 41(1):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch C, Kuby M, Zoldak M, Barranda A (2004) Using GIS to generate mutually exclusive service areas linking travel on and off a network. J Transp Geogr 12:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias J (2006) Exploratory behaviour in real and virtual environments. Landsc Urban Plan 78:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias J, Bai Z, Han X, Huang Y (2017) Local environment and social factors in primary school children’s afterschool commute in China. Prev Med Rep 7:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Architecture and Landscape, Peking University, No. 5, Yihe Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, China

    John Zacharias & Qi Zhao

Authors
  1. John Zacharias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Zacharias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zacharias, J., Zhao, Q. Local environmental factors in walking distance at metro stations. Public Transp 10, 91–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-017-0174-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-017-0174-y

Keywords