Abstract
In recent years, researchers have begun to explore how users’ views and opinions about public transit influence satisfaction and future behavioral intentions. This study uses primary survey data collected by the authors along a bus route in Montreal, Canada, to assess whether users’ image of public transit is associated with their satisfaction and intention to continue using public transit in the future. Two binary logit models are developed and the results reveal that having a positive image of transit increases users’ odds of being satisfied and of intending to continue using transit in the future. Results also suggest that previous transit usage is a good indicator of intended future usage. Furthermore, this study explores whether the users’ image of transit should be considered when assessing loyalty. Based on our findings, we suggest that loyalty constructs in public transit research should be composed of the users’ image of public transit, their overall satisfaction with a service, their willingness to recommend it to others, and, passengers’ intentions to continue using the service in the future. Overall, this study is useful for researchers and transit agencies aiming to better understand and increase loyalty among current and future public transit users.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarts H, Verplanken B, Knippenberg A (1998) Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J Appl Soc Psychol 28(15):1355–1374
Abou-Zeid M, Witter R, Bierlaire M, Kaufmann V, Ben-Akiva M (2012) Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp Policy 19(1):93–104
Allen D, Allen D (2004) Customer satisfaction research management: a comprehensive guide to integrating customer loyalty and satisfaction metrics in the management of complex organizations. ASQ Press, Milwaukee
Beirão G, Cabral J (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp Policy 14(6):478–489
Bergstad C, Gamble A, Garling T, Hagman O, Polk M, Ettema D, Friman M, Olsson L (2011) Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation 38:1–15
Carreira R, Patrício L, Natal J, Magee C (2014) Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider—a quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transp Policy 31:35–46
Chou P, Lu C, Chang Y (2014) Effects of service quality and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty in high-speed rail services in Taiwan. Transportmetrica A Transp Sci 10:917–945
de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp Policy 29:219–226
de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G (2016) Transit passengers’ behavioural intentions: the influence of service quality and customer satisfaction. Transportmetrica A Transp Sci 12(5):385–412
Diab E, El-Geneidy A (2014) Transitory optimism: changes in passenger perception following bus service improvement over time. Transp Res Rec 2415:97–106
Diab E, van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A (2017) Recommending transit: disentangling users’ willingness to recommend transit and their intended continued use. Travel Behav Soc 6:1–9
Duarte A, Garcia C, Giannarakis G, Limão S, Polydoropoulou A, Litinas N (2010) New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics. NETNOMICS Econ Res Electron Netw 11(1):5–32
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2015) Relationships between rail passengers’ satisfaction and service quality: a framework for identifying key service factors. Public Transp 7(2):185–201
Heskett J, Jones T, Loveman G, Sasser W, Schlesinger L (1994) Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Bus Rev 72:164–174
Hess D, Brown J, Shoup D (2004) Waiting for the bus. J Public Transp 7(4):67–84
Lai W, Chen C (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers—the roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transp Policy 18(2):318–325
Loveman G (1998) Employee satisfaction, customer loyalty, and financial performance an empirical examination of the service profit chain in retail banking. J Service Res 1(1):18–31
Mahajan V, Wind Y (2002) Got emotional product positioning? Mark Manag 11(3):36
Merkert R, Pearson J (2015) A non-parametric efficiency measure incorporating perceived airline service levels and profitability. J Transp Econ Policy 49(2):261–275
Minser J, Webb V (2010) Quantifying the benefits: application of customer loyalty modeling in public transportation context. Transp Res Rec 2144(1):111–120
Mishalani R, McCord M, Wirtz J (2006) Passenger wait time perceptions at bus stops: empirical results and impact on evaluating real-time bus arrival information. J Public Transp 9(2):89–106
Psarros I, Kepaptsoglou K, Karlaftis M (2011) An empirical investigation of passenger wait time perceptions. J Public Transp 14(3):109–122
Rigby D, Ledingham D (2004) CRM done right. Harvard Bus Rev 82(11):118–130
Schweitzer L (2014) Planning and social media: a case study of public transit and stigma on Twitter. J Am Plan Assoc 80(3):218–238
Sheller M (2004) Automotive emotions feeling the car. Theory Cult Soc 21(4–5):221–242
Shiftan Y, Barlach Y, Shefer D (2015) Measuring passenger loyalty to public transport modes. J Public Transp 18(1):7
Şimşekoğlu Ö, Nordfjærn T, Rundmo T (2015) The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transp Policy 42:113–120
Statistics Canada (2011) Visible minority and population group reference guide, National Household Survey, 2011. Statistics Canada
Stuart K, Mednick M, Bockman J (2000) Structural equation model of customer satisfaction for the New York City subway system. Transp Res Rec 1735:133–137
Transportation Research Board (1999) A handbook for measuring customer satisfaction and service quality, vol 47. Transportation Research Board: United States Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Portland Oregon (1995) Customer satisfaction index for the mass transit industry. Transit IDEA Project 1, Washington, DC
Tyrinopoulos Y, Antoniou C (2008) Public transit user satisfaction: variability and policy implications. Transp Policy 15(4):260–272
van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A (2016) Enjoying loyalty: the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res Transp Econ 59:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001
van Lierop D, Badami M, El-Geneidy A (2018) What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transp Rev 38(1):52–72
Wen C, Lan L, Cheng H (2005) Structural equation modeling to determine passenger loyalty toward intercity bus services. Transp Res Rec 1927(1):249–255
Zaichkowsky J (1994) The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advert 23(4):59–70
Zhao J, Webb V, Shah P (2014) Customer loyalty differences between captive and choice transit riders. Transp Res Rec 2415:80–88
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the bus users who participated in this study. This research is funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. The authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their detailed feedback on the earlier versions of the manuscript. The ideas and findings presented in this paper represent the authors’ views in an academic exercise.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Lierop, D., El-Geneidy, A. Is having a positive image of public transit associated with travel satisfaction and continued transit usage? An exploratory study of bus transit. Public Transp 10, 241–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-0175-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-0175-5