Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A virtual competition auction model for perishable products

  • General Research
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online auctions for perishable products have tremendous potentials. However, the current forms of online auctions do not take full advantages of information technology enabled online auctions, and are ineffective for online auctions for perishable products. This study proposes a virtual competition auction model for perishable products. In virtual competition auctions, the bidder is provided with auction historical data, and the bidder’s decision is represented by a demand curve that is composed of a series of bids. A preliminary laboratory experiment based on a prototype of virtual competition auction system is reported. The preliminary laboratory experiment result shows that the virtual competition auction model for perishable products is more effective than the ordinary open-cry auction model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘Lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amazon (2010). <http://www.amazon.com> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • Arminas, D. (2001). Online auctions take off far KLM. Supply Management, 6(22), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • AuctionSentry (2010). <http://www.auctionsentry.com/> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • AuctionStealer (2010). <http://www.auctionstealer.com/home.cfm> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • Bapna, R. (2003). When snipers become predators: can mechanism design save online auctions? Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapna, R., Goes, P., Gupta, A., & Karuga, G. (2002). Optimal design of the online auction channel: analytical, empirical, and computational insights. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 557–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapna, R., Goes, P., & Gupta, A. (2003). Analysis and design of business-to-customer online auctions. Management Science, 49(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brint, A. T. (2003). Investigating buyer and seller strategies in online auctions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 1177–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., Lai, V., & Liu, C. (2008). Research on consumer behavior in online auctions: Insights from a critical literature review. Electronic Markets, 18(4), 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daus, S., & Tong, C. (2010). Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 622–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • eBay (2010). <http://www.ebay.com> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • eShop (2010). Auctions, <http://auctions.msn.com/Scripts/glossary.asp> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • eSnipe (2010). <http://www.esnipe.com/> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • Gopal, R., Thompson, S., Tung, Y. A., & Whinston, A. B. (2005). Managing risks in multiple online auction: an options approach. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 397–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, J. E., Orhun, Y., & Ariely, D. (2004). Auction fever: the effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. K., Chu, S., & Lam, S. S. (2007). Maximum resolution topology for online auction markets. Electronic Markets, 17(2), 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., & O’keefe, R. M. (1999). The impact of the Web on auctions: some empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(3), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Wang, S., & Teng, F. (2003). Multicast-based online auctions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Auctions on the Internet: what’s being auctioned, and how? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48, 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, A. M. (2003). Snipers, stalkers, and nibblers: online auction business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., & Smith, V. (1999). Designing auction institutions for exchange. IIE Transactions, 31, 803–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Weber, R. J. (1982). The value of information in a sealed-bid auction. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 10(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. (2001). The price is right. Supply Management, 29, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliverira, R., Pozzebon, M., & Heck, E. V. (2007). Veiling Holambra - Trading Brazilian flowers in the international market enabled by IT. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 9(1), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, E. J., Seidmann, A., & Vakrat, Y. (2003). Managing online auctions: current business and research issues. Management Science, 49(11), 1457–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reck, M. (1997). Trading-process characteristics of electronic auction. Electronic Markets, 7(4), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitmore, M. (2001). Graphical model for identifying high outliers in construction contract auctions. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 800–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TheBidFloor (2010). <http://www.thebidfloor.com/buyers_sniping_software.htm> [Accessed September 25, 2010].

  • Trautmann, S. T., & Traxler, C. (2010). Reserve price as reference points—evidence from auctions for football players at Hattrick.org. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(2), 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E. (1997). Auctions and bidding on the Internet: an assessment. Electronic Markets, 7(4), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heck, E., & Ribbers, P. M. (1997). Experiences with electronic auctions in the Dutch flower industry. Electronic Markets, 7(4), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). Counter-speculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 41, 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, A., & Barnett, G. A. (2005). An empirical investigation into the structure of bidding in online auctions. Electronic Markets, 15(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2002). Synchronous online open-cry auctions. INFOR: Journal of Information Systems and Operational Research, 40(1), 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The comments of the Editor and two anonymous reviewers have contributed significantly to the revision of the article. The second author is supported in part by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Grant 312423).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DIS department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Rd., Dartmouth, MA, 02747, USA

    Shouhong Wang

  2. Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, B3H 3C3, Canada

    Hai Wang

Authors
  1. Shouhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouhong Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Summary of experimental data
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wang, H. A virtual competition auction model for perishable products. Electron Markets 21, 53–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0049-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0049-z

Keywords

JEL

Search

Navigation