Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mobile banking — insights on its increasing relevance and most common drivers of adoption

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fast advancement of mobile technologies and devices has increased the importance of mobile banking (m-banking) for financial institutions. Even though numerous studies have investigated the drivers of m-banking adoption, up to now there is no study that has critically reviewed the findings of previous efforts and evaluated the results in this field for researchers as well as practitioners. As a consequence, this article explores the most commonly used drivers to examine the adoption of m-banking through a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review of articles published between 2008 and 2011. With it, the results not only indicate that the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was mainly adapted by most m-banking studies but also reveal that the most common drivers of adoption can be categorized into four major dimensions, i.e. perceived usefulness, perceived risk, perceived compatibility and perceived cost. This article gives an introduction to the heightened relevance of m-banking, provides researchers with an overview of frequently harnessed drivers of m-banking adoption as well as future research opportunities and equips practitioners with an understanding for m-banking customers and corresponding managerial decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anckar, B., & D’Incau, D. (2002). Value creation in mobile commerce: findings from a consumer survey. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (2010). M-banking in developing markets: competitive and regulatory implications. Info, 12(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APA. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhimani, A. (1996). Securing the commercial internet. Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman, H., Carlsson, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Walden, P. (2007). Barriers and drivers in adopting actual and future mobile services in Finland. Telematics, 24(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I., Cajee, Z., Davies, D., & Stroebel, S. (2003). Cell phone banking: predictors of adoption in South Africa – an exploratory study. International Journal of Information Management, 23(5), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse, S. (2002). Der mobile Erfolg – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung in ausgewählten Branchen. In F. Keuper (Ed.), Electronic business und mobile business. Ansätze, Konzepte und Geschäftsmodelle. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capgemini & RBS (2011). World Payments Report 2011. Retrieved 16 September, 2011, from http://www.capgemini.com/insights-and-resources/by-publication/world-payments-report-2011/.

  • Chen, L. (2008). A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6(1), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, N., & Kwon, S. J. (2009). The effects of customers’ mobile experience and technical support on the intention to use mobile banking. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 12(5), 539–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisco VNI (2011). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2010–2015. Retrieved 13September, 2011, from http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.pdf.

  • Clark, B., & Penrose, E. (2009). Monetize Chapter Three - Banks, service and technology. Retrieved 22 August, 2011, from http://www.monitisegroup.com/uploads/assets/docs/money_on_the_move_chapter_three.pdf.

  • Clarke, I., III. (2008). Emerging value propositions for m-commerce. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(2), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain & Company (2009). Mobile Internet for Growth: Project Report. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2009. Davos, Switzerland, January 2009. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from http://www.bain.com/bainweb/PDFs/cms/Public/WEF_2009_Mobile_Internet.pdf

  • comScore (2011b). Press Release May 2011. Retrieved 1 August, 2011, from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/5/Europe_Sees_40_Percent_Growth_in_mobile_banking_Through_Smartphones.

  • Cruz, P., Filgueiras Neto, L. B., Muñoz-Gallego, P., & Laukkanen, T. (2010). Mobile banking rollout in emerging markets: evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 342–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., & Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: a literature review. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datamonitor. (2009). Mobile banking: over-hyped gimmick or credible 21st century banking channel? New York: Datamonitor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bank Research (2007). Mobile banking is ringing again. Will customers Answer?. Retrieved 29 August, 2011, from http://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN.

  • Fettke, P. (2006). State-of-the-Art des State-of-the-Art: Eine Untersuchung der Forschungsmethode “Review” innerhalb der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48(4), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner Research (2011a). Forecast: Mobile Communications Devices by Open Operating System, Worldwide, 2008–2015. Retrieved 12 February, 2012, from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1622614.

  • Gartner Research (2011b). Gartner Says Worldwide Mobile Payment Users to Reach 141 Million in 2011. Retrieved 3 March, 2012, from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1749114.

  • Geffen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of E-Commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgi, F., & Pinkl, J. (2005). Mobile banking in Deutschland. Die Bank, 3(1), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J. C., Lee, S. C., & Suh, Y. H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), 11605–11616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, A. (2003). Payments and banking with mobile personal devices. Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • IDC (2011). Worldwide Smartphone Market. Retrieved 13 September, 2011, from http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS22871611.

  • iSuppli (2011). Media Tablet Forecast. Retrieved 14 September, 2011, fromhttp://www.isuppli.com/Display-Materials-and-Systems/News/Pages/Media-Tablet-Forecast-Increased-as-Apple’s-Dominance-Grows.aspx.

  • ITU (2011). Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries and the world (totals and penetration rates). Retrieved 30 April, 2012, http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/KeyTelecom.html.

  • Kanniainen, L. (2010). Alternatives for banks to offer secure mobile payments. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, G. G., & Wolf, E. (2002). Iterative process models for mobile application systems: a framework. ICIS 2002 Proceedings, Paper 37, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G., Shin, B., & Le, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011). Monetizing Mobile - How banks are preserving their place in the payment value chain. Retrieved 3 August, 2011, from http://www.kpmg.com/GI/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPub.

  • Kuisma, T., Laukkanen, T., & Hiltunen, M. (2007). Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: a means -end approach. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, A. (2010). Can mobile banking fulfil its potential?. Retrieved 13 September, 2011, from www.telecoms.com/14746/can-mobile-banking-fulfil-its-potential.

  • Laukkanen, T. (2007a). Internet vs. mobile banking: comparing customer value perceptions. Business Process Management Journal, 13(6), 788–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, T. (2007b). Measuring mobile banking customers’ channel attribute preferences in service consumption. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 5(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, T., & Kiviniemi, V. (2010). The role of information in mobile banking resistance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, T., & Lauronen, J. (2005). Consumer value creation in mobile banking services. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 3(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, T., Sinkonnen, S., Kivijärvi, M., & Laukkanen, P. (2008). Innovation resistance among mature consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(7), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Pernici, B., & Krogstie, J. (2004). Mobile Information Systems. IFIP TC 8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems (MOBIS), 15–17 September 2004, 177–180.

  • Lee, J., & Allaway, A. (2008). Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. C., & Chung, N. (2009). Understanding factors affecting trust in and satisfaction with mobile banking in Korea: a modified DeLone and McLean’s model perspective. Interacting with Computers, 21(5), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.-J., Lee, J., & Eastwood, D. (2003). A two-step estimation of consumer adoption of technology-based service innovations. The Journal of Consumers Affairs, 37(2), 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-K., Park, J.-H., & Chung, N. (2009). An Exploratory Study on Factors Affecting Usage Intention toward mobile banking: A Unified Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling. Society for Marketing Advances Proceedings, 347–369.

  • Lin, H. F. (2010). An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: the effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. International Journal of Information Management, 3(3), 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luarn, P., & Lin, H. (2008). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, N. (2008). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments – a qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, D. (2010). The Business Case for Mobile Banking. Retrieved 30 April, 2012, from http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1082639.

  • Morgan Stanley Research (2010). Mobile Internet Trends. Retrieved 1 August, 2011, from http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/Internet_Trends_041210.pdf.

  • Paisner, J., Castonguay, A., & Collins, C. (2009). Mobile Banking Creates a Bright Spot Within the Struggling Financial Services Industry. Retrieved 24 August, 2011, from http://us.blackberry.com/business/industry/financial/mobile_banking_Whitepaper.pdf.

  • Püschel, J., Mazzon, J. A., & Hernandez, J. M. C. (2010). Mobile banking: proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, K., & Miller, M. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riquelme, H. E., & Rios, R. E. (2010). The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2009). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D.-H. (2009). Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1343–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suoranta, M., & Mattila, M. (2004). Mobile banking and consumer behavior: new insights into the diffusion pattern. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(4), 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swilley, E. (2010). Technology rejection: the case of the wallet phone. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 304–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: a multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers in Education, 53(2), 1000–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Buse, S. (2007). The mobile commerce prospects: a strategic analysis of opportunities in the banking sector. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Department for International Development (2010). Summit to help “unbanked” people in developing world. Retrieved 3 August, 2011, from http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Summit-looks-to-help-unbanked-in-developing-world/.

  • Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2009). The state of research on information systems success - a review of existing multidimensional approaches. Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE) - The International Journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik, 1(4), 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshney, U. (2004). Group-oriented mobile services: requirements and solutions. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2(4), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • VeriSign, M-Com, & Fiserv (2009). New Research Reveals Untapped Market for Mobile Banking Among Offline Consumers. Retrieved 9 August, 2011, from http://www.mcom.co.nz/assets/sm/284/12/M-Com,FiservandVeriSign-OfflineConsumersResearchPaperOct2009.pdf.

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, L., & Drennan, J. (2010). An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(7), 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, T. (2010). The impact of privacy concern on user adoption of location-based services. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(2), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESCP Europe Wirtschaftshochschule Berlin, Heubnerweg 8-10, 14059, Berlin, Germany

    Kyung-Hun Ha, Andrea Canedoli, Aaron W. Baur & Markus Bick

Authors
  1. Kyung-Hun Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Canedoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aaron W. Baur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus Bick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Bick.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roger W. H. Bons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ha, KH., Canedoli, A., Baur, A.W. et al. Mobile banking — insights on its increasing relevance and most common drivers of adoption. Electron Markets 22, 217–227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0107-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0107-1

Keywords

JEL classification