Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feature subset selection for predicting the success of crowdfunding project campaigns

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistics from crowdfunding platforms show that a small percent of crowdfunding projects succeed in securing funds. This makes project creators eager to know the probability of success of their campaign and the features that contribute to its success before launching it on crowdfunding platforms. The existing literature focuses on examining success probability using the entire list of identified projects features. For situations for which project creators have limited resources to invest on the required project features, the list suggested by previous researchers is somewhat large and gives a small success probability. A minimal number of features that predict success with a higher probability can benefit project creators by providing them with insight and guidance in investing their limited resources. This paper presents a metaheuristic whale optimization algorithm (WOA) in the crowdfunding context to perform a complete search of a subset of features that have a high success contribution power. Experiments were conducted using WOA with the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier on a Kickstarter dataset. Our approach obtains a subset of 9 features that predict the success of project campaigns with an accuracy (F-score) of 90.28% (90.11%), which is an increase (F-score) of 22.23% (21.61%) than when a complete set of features is used. The findings of this study contribute knowledge to various crowdfunding stakeholders, as they will provide new insights regarding a subset of essential features th4at influence the success of project campaigns with high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, F.S., Tyagi, D., Kaur, S. (2017). Predicting crowdfunding success with optimally weighted random forests, in: Infocom technologies and unmanned systems (trends and future directions)(ICTUS), 2017 international conference on. pp. 770–775.

  • Aljarah, I., Ala’M, A.-Z., Faris, H., Hassonah, M. A., Mirjalili, S., & Saadeh, H. (2018). Simultaneous feature selection and support vector machine optimization using the grasshopper optimization algorithm. Cognit. Comput., 1–18.

  • Aziz, R., Verma, C. K., & Srivastava, N. (2016). A fuzzy based feature selection from independent component subspace for machine learning classification of microarray data. Genomics data, 8, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014). A survey on feature selection methods. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 40, 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-Y., Chen, C.-N., Chen, Y.-R., Yang, C.-W., Lin, W.-C., Wei, C.-P. (2015) Will your project get the green light? Predicting the success of crowdfunding campaigns., in: PACIS. p. 79.

  • Chuang, L.-Y., Tsai, S.-W., & Yang, C.-H. (2011). Improved binary particle swarm optimization using catfish effect for feature selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12699–12707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B., Soto, R., Astorga, G., Garcia, J., Castro, C., & Paredes, F. (2017). Putting continuous metaheuristics to work in binary search spaces. Complexity, 2017.

  • Dash, M. (1997). Feature selection via set cover, in: Knowledge and Data Engineering Exchange Workshop, 1997. Proceedings. pp., 165–171.

  • Domeniconi, C., Peng, J., & Gunopulos, D. (2002). Locally adaptive metric nearest-neighbor classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 1281–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elenchev, I., Vasilev, A., others (2017). Forecasting the success rate of reward based Crowdfunding projects. ZBW.

  • Emary, E., Zawbaa, H. M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2016a). Binary ant lion approaches for feature selection. Neurocomputing, 213, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emary, E., Zawbaa, H. M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2016b). Binary grey wolf optimization approaches for feature selection. Neurocomputing, 172, 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, V., Grossglauser, M., Thiran, P. (2013). Launch hard or go home!: Predicting the success of kickstarter campaigns, in: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks. pp. 177–182.

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics new. NY, USA: York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, M., Yan, J., Shen, B., Ma, L., & Cai, Q. (2016). Influence maximization in social networks based on discrete particle swarm optimization. Inf. Sci. (Ny)., 367, 600–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M.D., Pardo, B., Hariharan, K., Gerber, E. (2013). Crowdfunding support tools: Predicting success & failure, in: CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1815–1820.

  • Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1157–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, P. (2012a). Machine learning in action. CT: Manning Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, P. (2012b). Machine learning in action. Shelter Island: NY Manning Publ. Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., & Gera, J. (2017). Effect of social media connectivity on success of crowdfunding campaigns. Procedia Comput. Sci., 122, 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuswamy, V., Bayus, B.L. (2018). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers, in: The Economics of Crowdfunding. Springer, pp. 151–182.

  • Li, Y., Rakesh, V., Reddy, C.K. (2016). Project success prediction in crowdfunding environments, in: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. pp. 247–256.

  • Liu, H., Motoda, H. (1998). Feature extraction, construction and selection: A data mining perspective. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., & Motoda, H. (2007). Computational methods of feature selection. CRC Press.

  • Mafarja, M. M., & Mirjalili, S. (2017). Hybrid whale optimization algorithm with simulated annealing for feature selection. Neurocomputing, 260, 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, W., others, (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in python, in: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. pp. 51–56.

  • Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016). The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, I. H., & Laporte, G. (1996). Metaheuristics: A bibliography. Springer.

  • Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahir, M. A., Bouridane, A., & Kurugollu, F. (2007). Simultaneous feature selection and feature weighting using hybrid Tabu search/K-nearest neighbor classifier. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28, 438–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbi, E.-G. (2002). A taxonomy of hybrid metaheuristics. Journal of Heuristics, 8, 541–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbi, E.-G. (2009). Metaheuristics: From design to implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. (2011). The NumPy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. Q., Fu, M. X., & Zhao, L. M. (2016). Successful factors and herding phenomenon of crowdfunding. Soft Sci., 30, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. J., Lu, B., Fan, W. P., & Wang, G. A. (2018). Project description and crowdfunding success: An exploratory study. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

    Michael J. Ryoba, Shaojian Qu & Yongyi Zhou

Authors
  1. Michael J. Ryoba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaojian Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongyi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Ryoba.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Judith Gebauer

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryoba, M.J., Qu, S. & Zhou, Y. Feature subset selection for predicting the success of crowdfunding project campaigns. Electron Markets 31, 671–684 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00398-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation