Abstract
Live-streaming is now a popular form of new media as well as an important driver of E-Commerce. Nowhere is this seen more than in video-game streaming on Twitch. Streaming platforms like Twitch now provide specific affordances specifically designed to promote and facilitate videogame-streaming. Developers too provide their own game-based affordances to encourage the streaming of their games. However, despite the popularity of Twitch with viewers and game developers, this dichotomy of platform- and game-based streaming affordances has received little attention. This study helps to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the factors that drive streamers use of both platform and videogame affordances as they create streaming content. The study uses empirical data on 5,656 Twitch streamers (n = 5,656) to examine how platform affordances are combined with those available in games through a process we call “game-swinging”. Key results of the study show that platform-based affordances lend themselves well to game-swinging behaviours, while videogame-based affordances may be difficult for streamers to utilize without specific emphasis on streaming a single-game. These and other findings yield a deeper understanding of the processes that drive live-streaming content creation across a variety of e-Commerce platforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2020/09/17/fall-guys-streaming/ Accessed on 6/9/2022.
Newzoo (2021, March 11). Global ESports & Live Streaming Market Report 2021 Retrieved from newzoo.com.
References
Abarbanel, B., & Johnson, M. R. (2020). Gambling engagement mechanisms in twitch live streaming. International Gambling Studies, 20(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2020.1766097
Ahmad, S., Bouras, C., Buyukkaya, E., Dawood, M., Hamzaoui, R., Kapoulas, V., Papazois, A., & Simon, G. (2018). Peer-to-peer live video streaming with rateless codes for massively multiplayer online games. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 11(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-016-0495-7
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
Bainbridge, W. S. (2012). The Warcraft civilization: Social science in a virtual world. MIT Press.
Boczkowski, P. J., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
Burroughs, B., & Rama, P. (2015). The eSports Trojan horse: Twitch and streaming futures. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v8i2.7176
Burton-Jones, A., & Volkoff, O. (2017). How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0702
Cai, J., Wohn, D. Y., & Freeman, G. (2019). Who purchases and why? Explaining motivations for in-game purchasing in the online survival game Fortnite. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 391–396). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347196
Chan, T. K., Cheung, C. M., & Wong, R. Y. (2019). Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(2), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1599500
Chen, L., Baird, A., & Straub, D. (2019). Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems, 118, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.008
Cox, A., Cairns, P., Shah, P., & Carroll, M. (2012). Not doing but thinking: The role of challenge in the gaming experience. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207689
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Springer Science & Business Media.
Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491
Faik, I., Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2020). How information technology matters in societal change: An affordance-based institutional logics perspective. MIS Quarterly, 44(3), 1359–1390. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14193
Gascon, J. G., Doherty, S. M., & Liu, D. (2015). Investigation of videogame flow: Effects of expertise and challenge. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 1853–1857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591400
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 79–84).
Geraci, R. M. (2014). Virtually sacred: Myth and meaning in world of warcraft and second life. Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hamari, J., & Sjöblom, M. (2017). What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Research, 27(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0085
Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557048
Hallmann, K., & Giel, T. (2018). eSports–competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Management Review, 21(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.011
Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Community and Society, 11(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150
Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
Hou, M. (2019). Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube. Convergence, 25(3), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750368
Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
Jiang, J., & Cameron, A.-F. (2020). IT-enabled self-monitoring for chronic disease self-management: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 451–508. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/15108
Johnson, M. R., & Woodcock, J. (2019). It’s like the gold rush: The lives and careers of professional video game streamers on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1386229
Johnson, M. R., Carrigan, M., & Brock, T. (2019). The imperative to be seen: The moral economy of celebrity video game streaming on Twitch.tv. First Monday, 24(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i8.8279
Junyun, L., & Xuebing, D. (2021). Understanding the antecedents and outcomes of brand community-swinging in a poly-social-media context: A perspective of channel complementarity theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(3), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-11-2020-0820
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1718740
Kaytoue, M., Silva, A., Cerf, L., Meira Jr, W., & Raïssi, C. (2012). Watch me playing, i am a professional: A first study on video game live streaming. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188259
Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Kankanhalli, A. (2012). What motivates people to purchase digital items on virtual community websites? The desire for online self-presentation. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0411
King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Gainsbury, S. M., Dreier, M., Greer, N., & Billieux, J. (2019). Unfair play? Video games as exploitative monetized services: An examination of game patents from a consumer protection perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.017
Lee, A. S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.4.342
Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017). Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of Gamified information systems. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1011–1034. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.01
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Lommatsch, C. W., Litster, K., Ashby, J., Bullock, E. K., Roxburgh, A. L., Shumway, J. F., Speed, E., Covington, B., & Hartmann, C. (2019). How design features in digital math games support learning and mathematics connections. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.036
Nematzadeh, A., Ciampaglia, G. L., Ahn, Y.-Y., & Flammini, A. (2016). Information overload in group communication: From conversation to cacophony in the Twitch chat. Royal Society Open Science, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191412
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
Poirier-Poulin, S. (2020). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1505–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939317
Scully-Blaker, R., Begy, J., Consalvo, M., & Ganzon, S. (2017). Playing along and playing for on twitch: Livestreaming from tandem play to performance. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
Simon, H. A. (1977). Causal ordering and identifiability. In Models of discovery (pp. 53–80). Springer.
Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2017). Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
Sjöblom, M., Törhönen, M., Hamari, J., & Macey, J. (2019). The ingredients of Twitch streaming: Affordances of game streams. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.012
Swanger, D. (1993). The arts, empathy, and Aristotle. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 27(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333340
Tandoc Jr., E. C., Lou, C., & Min, V. L. H. (2019). Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022
Taylor, T. L. (2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton University Press.
Tsai, H. T., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.07
Wohn, D. Y., Jough, P., Eskander, P., Siri, J. S., Shimobayashi, M., & Desai, P. (2019). Understanding digital patronage: Why do people subscribe to streamers on twitch? In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 99–110). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347160
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Fabio Lobato
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Church, E.M., Thambusamy, R. Game-swinging on Twitch: an affordances perspective. Electron Markets 32, 1677–1689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00574-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00574-8