Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ evaluation strategies in a Web research task: Are they sensitive to relevance and reliability?

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When searching and using resources on the Web, students have to evaluate Web pages in terms of relevance and reliability. This evaluation can be done in a more or less systematic way, by either considering deep or superficial cues of relevance and reliability. The goal of this study was to examine how systematic students are when evaluating Web pages. Forty-two undergraduate students performed a Web research task. They were provided with a search-engine results page including 12 Web pages, which were relevant/irrelevant and reliable/unreliable. The students had to navigate the pages for 30 min to prepare for a subsequent test on a target topic. Their navigation behaviors were video-recorded and analyzed. The findings revealed that the students were not systematic when accessing the pages: They accessed more unreliable pages than reliable pages. The pattern was different when considering study time: The students allocated more time to relevant and reliable pages. Finally, allocating additional time to relevant Web pages was associated with better learning from the materials. Overall, the results suggest that undergraduate students are able to deploy systematic evaluations of Web resources and this is crucial for achieving learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anmarkrud, Ø., McCrudden, M. T., Braten, I., & Strømsø, H. (2013). Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: Online comprehension processes and offline products. Instructional Science, 41, 873–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53, 1207–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2009). Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • European-Union. (2012). Internet use in households and by individuals in 2012. Eurostat: Statistics in focus, 50.

  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning-by-teaching and teaching-expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., & Lehman, B. A. (2011). Questions drive comprehension of text and multimedia. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 53–74). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15.

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., & Strømsø, H. (2013). The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons’ source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1193–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, D. (2012). Credibility in Web search engines. In S. Apostel & M. Folk (Eds.), Online credibility and digital ethos: Evaluating computer-mediated communication. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J. M. (2013). The influence of source cues and topic familiarity on credibility evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1387–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line: Digital technologies and performance (Vol. VI). Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 801–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingdom. (2013, January). Internet 2012 in numbers. Royal Pingdom, Retrieved June 17, 2013 from http://royal.pingdom.com/2013/2001/2016/internet-2012-in-numbers

  • Rieh, S. Y., Kim, Y. M., & Markey, K. (2012). Amount of invested mental effort (AIME) in online searching. Information Processing and Management, 48, 1136–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., Goumi, A., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Dinet, J. (2011). The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students’ assessment of relevance in Web menus. Learning and Instruction, 21, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmerón, L., Kammerer, Y., & García-Carrión, P. (2013). Searching the Web for conflicting topics: Page and user factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2161–2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F, Jr, Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1081–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2008). Information- problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 623–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Cantabria, Avenida de los Castros s/n, 39005, Santander, Cantabria, Spain

    Héctor García Rodicio

Authors
  1. Héctor García Rodicio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Héctor García Rodicio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodicio, H.G. Students’ evaluation strategies in a Web research task: Are they sensitive to relevance and reliability?. J Comput High Educ 27, 134–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9098-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9098-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation