Abstract
Research on mobile learning indicates that students perceive mobile devices mainly as communication and entertainment tools. Therefore, a key factor in successful mobile learning implementation is the initial measurement of students’ acceptance of those devices into their learning. Countless language applications available suggest that mobile devices can be ideal tools for language learning. Surprisingly, there are few studies reporting students’ acceptance of mobile assisted language learning (MALL), let alone MALL acceptance in developing countries. By adapting and extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model, the study assesses the dimensions affecting behavioral intentions and actual use of MALL. Data were collected and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results show that performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions influence students’ attitudes towards using MALL. Accordingly, attitude is the factor that affects behavioral intention the most. The model also shows that behavioral intention has an effect on MALL use. The study concludes that students enrolled in higher education in developing countries such as Colombia have a positive attitude towards MALL. However, an improvement of facilitating conditions, along with a more influential role of the educational community is needed for a successful MALL integration in education.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2e5f/c2e5f8026b3b41f0ee1c5ac2093592b3e722480e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc005/fc005eb9b32fe1089c0d8953206165d6681ff3d9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b03c3/b03c35a62df3048df3abc0864fb96f129f2289f1" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 82–107.
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035.
Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2007). Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2904–2927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.005.
Avci, U., & Askar, P. (2012). The comparison of the opinions of the university students on the usage of blog and wiki for their courses. Educational Technology and Society, 15(2), 194–205.
Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 7.
Böhm, S., & Constantine, G. P. (2016). Impact of contextuality on mobile learning acceptance: An empirical study based on a language learning app. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(2), 107–122.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(01), 4–20.
Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M-learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91.
Chan, W., Chi, S., & Lin, C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards podcast-based learning: A comparison of two language podcast projects. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8, 312–335.
Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809–826.
Chen, X.-B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20–36.
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., & Kinshuk, (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80942-8.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Demouy, V., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning, 25(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.511955.
Deng, H. (2011). Self-directed English vocabulary learning with a mobile application in everyday context. In 10th world conference on mobile and contextual learning: mLearn 2011 conference proceedings (pp. 24–31).
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(02), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000287.
Escobar-Rodríguez, T., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2014). Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool: An extension of the UTAUT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 136–151.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Rigdon, E. E. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(2), 3–14.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11.
Gordon, M. (2013). India, China and the map to two billion connected devices. Retrieved from http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/page/8. Accessed 25 May 2017.
Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2015). Adult learners’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12148F.
Hsu, H. H. (2013). The acceptance of Moodle: An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3(08), 44.
Iqbal, S., & Qureshi, I. A. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 147–164.
Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An acceptance of mobile learning for higher education students in Thailand. In Paper presented at the sixth international conference on eLearning for knowledge-based society. Bangkok.
Kim, G. M., & Lee, S. J. (2016). Korean Students’ Intentions to use mobile-assisted language learning: Applying the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Contents. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2016.12.3.047.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kuo, Y.-F., & Yen, S.-N. (2009). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.007.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130–151.
Li, Z., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 135–156.
Lin, S., Zimmer, J. C., & Lee, V. (2013). Podcasting acceptance on campus: The differing perspectives of teachers and students. Computers & Education, 68, 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.003.
Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018.
López-Bonilla, L. M., & López-Bonilla, J. M. (2017). Explaining the discrepancy in the mediating role of attitude in the TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 940–949.
Marchewka, J. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93.
Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.1.d.
Nassuora, A. (2013). Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijlms/010101.
Nistor, N., & Heymann, J. O. (2010). Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: An answer to Teo (2009a). British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, E142–E145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01109.x.
Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x.
Pindeh, N., Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2016). User acceptance on mobile apps as an effective medium to learn Kadazandusun language. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 372–378.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan : An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007.
Segaran, K., Ali, A. Z. M., & Hoe, T. W. (2014). Usability and user satisfaction of 3D talking-head mobile assisted language learning (MALL) app for non-native speakers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.069.
Seo, W., & Choi, I. (2014). The effect of using a smartphone application on middle school students’ English expression learning and satisfaction. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17, 34–57.
Smarkola, C. (2011). A mixed-methodological technology adoption study. In Technology acceptance in education (pp. 9–41). Sense Publishers.
Soleimani, E., Ismail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) among post graduate ESL students in UKM. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.062.
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, 33(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00026-8.
Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre-and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602–620.
Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of English E-learning websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837.
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.
Teo, T. (Ed.). (2011). Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4.
The E-Learning guild: 61 tips on m-learning. (2012). Retrieved from http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~ldt/edweb_web/Courses/EDTEC596/ML/ebook_mlearningtips2012.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2017.
Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85.
Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Karadağ, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers & Education, 81, 169–178.
Van Schaik, P. (2009). Unified theory of acceptance and use for websites used by students in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.2.e.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2012, October). Mobile assisted language learning: A literature review. In Paper presented at the 11th international conference on mobile and contextual learning. Helsinki.
Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014.
Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., Zhang, X., & King, R. B. (2015). Employing the TPACK framework for researcher-teacher co-design of a mobile-assisted seamless language learning environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2354038.
Wu, J., & Du, H. (2012). Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 680–698.
Wu, C. C., Li, C. C., & Tsai, C. F. (2013). Factors determining of effects of teachers’ web-based teaching platform usage-using UTAUT to explore. Journal of Internet Technology, 14(6), 919–928.
Wu, W.-H., Wu, Y.-C. J., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016.
Yueh, H., Huang, J., & Chang, C. (2015). Exploring factors affecting students’ continued Wiki use for individual and collaborative learning : An extended UTAUT perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 16–31.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by the European Commission-Erasmus Mundus Action 2-Eureka SD Project under the Grant Number 2013-2591/001-001. The data of this study can be accessed upon request. The participants of this study were told that their participation was voluntary and their personal data were protected by using a code to replace their personal information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors would like to state that there is no potential conflict of interest in this study and that the paper is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García Botero, G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S. et al. Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. J Comput High Educ 30, 426–451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1