Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing. A university and a society belonging to the twenty-first century require students and professionals who can use their language correctly in any context, device and mode of communication. The research was based on a sample of 1237 digital interactions in discussion forums and emails between students of the National University of Distance Learning on subjects related to academic work. We applied a descriptive quantitative methodology by means of a statistical and lexicometric analysis of the written texts and multiple regression analysis, related to four independent variables: gender, studies, interlocutor (professor/student), and digital device (fixed, mobiles) and three orthographic sub-levels (punctuation, accentuation and spelling). The results show that there is considerable room for improvement in the orthography of university students’ asynchronous digital writing. A total of 71.3% of errors were not conditioned by independent variables but by ignorance of the orthographic rules or incorrect use of the language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Barnett, R. (2001). Los límites de la competencia. El conocimiento, la educación superior y la sociedad. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. A. (1998). Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas. Ti and Nudist Compared. Sociological Research Online, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/3/4.html.

  • BBC. (2011). Spelling mistakes cost millions in lost online sales. Education and Family. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.iad-scientific-editing.co.uk/spelling_mistakes_cost_millions_in_lost_online_sales.pdf.

  • Bodomo, A. B., & Lee, C. K. M. (2004). Linguistic features of SMS texts in Hong Kong. Australian Journal of Communication, 11, 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, E. (2003). Conversations in cyberspace: A study of online learning. Online Learning, 18(3), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruthiaux, P. (1993). Knowing when to stop: Investigating the nature of punctuation. Language and Communication, 13(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldera, R. (2002). Escritura y escuela: investigación-acción en el aula. Memorias del VII Congreso Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo de la Lectura y la Escritura (pp. 268–272). México: Consejo de Lectura de Puebla, A. C.

  • Carico, K. M., & Logan, D. (2004). A generation in cyberspace: Engaging readers through online discussions. Language Arts, 81(4), 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassany, D. (2003). La escritura electrónica. Cultura y educación, 3(15), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciria, P. (2009). Los universitarios suspenden en ortografía. Fundeu-Heraldo de Aragon. Retrieved from http://www.fundeu.es/noticia/los-universitarios-suspenden-en-ortografia-5060/.

  • Dublin Descriptors. (2005). Shared “Dublin” descriptors for the Bachelor´s, Master´s and Doctoral awards. Draft 1.31 working document on JQI meeting in Dublin. 2004PC.

  • EACEA/Eurydice. (2011). Modernisation of higher education in Europe: Funding and the social dimension. Brussels: EACEA P9 Eurydice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores Vivar, J. M. (2009). Nuevos modelos de comunicación, perfiles y tendencias en las redes sociales. Comunicar, 33, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraca de Barrera, L. (2006). La ciberlingua. Una variedad compleja de lengua en Internet. Caracas: Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Lingüísticas y Literarias “Andrés Bello”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Camacho, A. (2007). La ortografía del español y los géneros electrónicos. Comunicar, 29, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Camacho, A. (2014). La norma disortográfica en la escritura. Didac, 63, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, M., Roses, S., & Farias, P. (2012). El uso académico de las redes sociales en universitarios. Comunicar, 38, 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Lloret, M. (2011). Conversation analysis of computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(6), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. C. (2013). Relevance in computer-mediated conversation. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 245–268). Berlin: Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Tanna, V. (2008). Aspects of sequential organization in text message exchange. Discourse and Communication, 2(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Walton, S. (2000). The voices people read: Orthography and the representation of non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(4), 561–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. (2010). Texting, Twitter contributing to students’ poor grammar skills, profs say. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/texting-twitter-contributing-to-students-poor-grammar-skills-profs-say/article4304193/.

  • Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafon, P. (1980). Sur la variabilité des fréquences des formes dans un corpus. Mots, 1, 127–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., & Salem, A. (1994). Statistique textuelle. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K. M. (2011). Micro-blogging and status updates on facebook:Texts and practices. In C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (Eds.), Digital discourse. Language in the new media (pp. 110–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LOMCE. (2013). Organic law on the improvement of the quality of Education. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-12886.

  • Markman, K. M. (2013). Conversational coherence in small group chat. In S. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 539–564). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez de Sousa, J. (1985). Diccionario de ortografía. Madrid: Anaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayans i Planells, J. (2002). De la incorrección normativa en los chats. Revista de investigación Lingüística, 2(5), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina Guerra, A. (1994). La enseñanza de la ortografía en la Universidad. Reale, 2, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, N. (2016). What’s the point? The role of punctuation in realising information structure in written English. Functional Linguistics, 3(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0029-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, O. (2001). ¿Cómo contribuir con el desarrollo de las competencias de los estudiantes universitarios como productores de textos? II Simposio Internacional de Lectura y Vida. Buenos Aires: Asociación Internacional de Lectura/Lectura y Vida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrilla, E. A. (2008). Alteraciones del lenguaje en la era digital. Comunicar, 30, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, G. (2008, Agosto 6). University students ‘cannot spell’. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2510704/University-students-cannot-spell.html.

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC2007): A text analysis program. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B., Wood, C., & Bell, V. (2008). Text Msg in school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Literacy, 42(3), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol, M. (1999). Análisis de errores grafemáticos en textos libres de estudiantes de enseñanzas medias. Tesis de Doctorado. Departamento de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura. Universidad de Barcelona.

  • Riordan, M. A., Markman, K. M., & Stewart, C. O. (2013). Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., & Plati, T. (2002). Does it matter with what I write? Comparing performance on paper, computer and portable writing devices. Current Issues in Education, 5(4) Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume5/number4/.

  • Sevillano, M. L., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2015). The impact of digital mobile devices in Higher Education. Educational Technology and Society, 18(1), 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixto, J. (2011). La red social Tuenti: análisis del modelo de comunicación y de la estrategia de marketing. Telos: Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, 89, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, L. (2010). Enregistering internet language. Language in Society, 39, 457–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Canadian Press. (2010, Febrero 1). Bad grammar clogging university essays. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/bad-grammar-clogging-university-essays-1.938930.

  • Tuana, E. (1980). Diez años de investigaciones ortográficas. Lectura y vida, Revista Latinoamericana de lectura, 2, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano, E. (2012). Mobile learning with Twitter to improve linguistic competence at secondary schools. The New Educational Review, 29(3), 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano, E. (2014). Mobile distance learning with smartphones and apps in higher education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12738/est.2014.4.2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Fombona, J., & Fernández, A. (2013). Virtual attendance: Analysis of an audiovisual over IP system for distance learning in the Spanish Open University (UNED). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 14(3), 402–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Mengual-Andrés, S., & Roig-Vila, R. (2015). Lexicometric analysis of the specifity of teenagers’ digital writing in WhatsApp. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 53(1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S., & Pury, C. (2002). Student attitudes toward and participation in electronic discussions. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research forms part of the work carried out by the Alfamed group (EuroAmerican Interuniversity Network for Research on Media Competences for Citizens), with the support of the Coordinated I+D+I Project called “Citizens’ Media Competences in emerging digital media (smartphones and tablets): innovative practices and educommunication strategies in multiple contexts” (EDU2015-64015-C3-1-R) (MINECO/FEDER), and of the “Media Education Network” of the State Program for the Promotion of Excellence in Scientific-Technical Research, the State Subprogram for Knowledge Generation (EDU2016-81772-REDT), financed by FEDER (European Regional Development Fund) and Spain’s Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Didactics and School Organization, Faculty of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal 14, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Ana Isabel Holgueras González & José Manuel Sáez-López

Authors
  1. Esteban Vázquez-Cano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Isabel Holgueras González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Manuel Sáez-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteban Vázquez-Cano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vázquez-Cano, E., González, A.I.H. & Sáez-López, J.M. An analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing. J Comput High Educ 31, 1–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9189-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9189-x

Keywords