Abstract
This paper offers a synthesis on computing identity and the experiences of women and minoritized populations in computing and computer science in higher education. Examining computing identity and its role in the computing experiences of minoritized undergraduates can help us better understand ways to engage and support women and minoritized individuals in the computing field thus increasing participation and persistence of these groups in computing. In this article, we present a review of research literature on computing identity within the experiences of women and minoritized undergraduate students in computing. The research questions guiding this work are: (1) What research literature exists about computing identity?, (2) According to existing literature, what are the experiences of women and racially minoritized undergraduates in computing (e.g., persons who identify as Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Indigenous people)?, and (3) What theoretical frameworks are used to guide existing computing identity literature? Emergent themes include the need to focus on exposure to computing, persistence, career expectations, and engagement. While there is no consensus on a computer identity framework, there is research guided by social cognitive career theory, social identity theory, and practice theory. We conclude that computing identity, including its multiple conceptualizations, offers multiple opportunities for informing and broadening participation of minoritized populations in computing. Future research should include further conceptual exploration of computing identity.

Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbiss, J. (2011). Boys and machines: Gendered computer identities, regulation and resistance. Gender and Education, 23(5), 601–617.
Alvarado, C., Dodds, Z., & Libeskind-Hadas, R. (2012). Increasing women’s participation in computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads, 3, 55–64.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.
Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 29–46.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
Bacchini, F., & Lorusso, L. (2019). Race, again: how face recognition technology reinforces racial discrimination. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society., 17, 321–335.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Barker, L. J., Snow, E., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Weston, T. (2006). Recruiting middle school girls into IT: Data on girls’ perceptions and experiences from a mixed-demographic group. na.
Barnir, A., Watson, W. E., & Hutchins, H. M. (2011). Mediation and moderated mediation in the relationship among role models, self-efficacy, entrepreneurial career intention, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 270–297.
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29
Bell-Watkins, K., Barnes, T., & Thomas, N. (2009). Developing computing identity as a model for prioritizing dynamic K-12 computing curricular standards. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(3), 125–131.
Berk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66–71.
Bettin, B., Jarvie-Eggart, M., Steelman, K. S., & Wallace, C. (2020). Infusing computing identity into introductory engineering instruction. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Blaney, J. M., & Stout, J. G. (2017). Examining the relationship between introductory computing course experiences, self-efficacy, and belonging among first-generation college women. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 69–74).
Blunt, T., & Pearson, T. (2021). Exploring the digital identity divide: A call for attention to computing identity at HBCUs. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 640–646).
Boyer, K. E., Thomas, E. N., Rorrer, A. S., Cooper, D., & Vouk, M. A. (2010). Increasing technical excellence, leadership and commitment of computing students through identity-based mentoring. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 167–171).
Brattesani, K. A., Weinstein, R. S., & Marshall, H. H. (1984). Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment as moderators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 236–247.
Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: THe Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2001). The question of social transformation. In E. Beck-Gernsheim, J. Butler, & L. Puigvert (Eds.), Women and social transformation (pp. 1–28). Peter Lang.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: THe Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194.
Castro, B., Diaz, T., Gee, M., Justice, R., Kwan, D., Seshadri, P., & Dodds, Z. (2016). MyCS at 5: Assessing a middle-years CS curriculum. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education (pp. 558–563).
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Cummings, R. T., Huff, E. H., Mack, N. A., Womack, K., Reid, A., Ghoram, B., & Gilbert, J. E. (2020). An exploration of black students interacting with computing college and career readiness vlog commentary social media influencers. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(5), 29–40.
Dahlberg, T., Barnes, T., & Rorrer, A. (2007). The STARS leadership model for broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 17–22).
Dahlberg, T., Barnes, T., Buch, K., & Bean, K. (2010). Applying service learning to computer science: Attracting and engaging under-represented students. Computer Science Education, 20(3), 169–180.
Dempsey, J., Snodgrass, R. T., Kishi, I., & Titcomb, A. (2015). The emerging role of self-perception in student intentions. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 108–113).
Denner, J., Lyon, L. A., & Werner, L. (2015). Does gender matter? Women talk about being female in college computing classes. In Proceedings of the third conference on GenderIT (pp. 44–48).
DiSalvo, James B., Yardi, S., Guzdial, M., McKlin, T., Meadows, C., Perry, K., & Bruckman, A. (2011). African American men constructing computing identity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2967–2970).
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education, 103(3), 623–637.
Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., & Avraamidou, L. (2021). Enhancing students’ interest in science and understandings of STEM careers: The role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717–736.
DuBow, W., Kaminsky, A., & Weidler-Lewis, J. (2017). Multiple factors converge to influence women’s persistence in computing: A qualitative analysis. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19(3), 30–39.
Eglash, R. (Ed.). (2004). Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. University of Minnesota Press.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity (p. 144). Blackwell.
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 5.
Falcone, T. M. (2011). Toward a new model of student persistence in higher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Charlotte, NC.
Gagnon, R. J., & Sandoval, A. (2020). Pre-college STEM camps as developmental context: Mediational relations between gender, career decidedness, socioemotional development, and engagement. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, 104584.
Garcia, A., Ross, M., Hazari, Z., Weiss, M., Christensen, K., & Georgiopoulos, M. (2018). Examining the computing identity of high-achieving underserved computing students on the basis of gender, field, and year in school. Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD).
Gee, J. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125.
Gilbert, J. (2001). Science and its ‘other’: Looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gender and Education, 13, 291–305.
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340.
Goldston, M., & Kyzer, P. (2009). Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 762–790.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700.
Guiffrida, D. A. (2006). Toward a cultural advancement of Tinto’s theory. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 451–472.
Hampton, L., Cummings, R., & Gosha, K. (2019). Improving computer science instruction and computer use for African American secondary school students: A focus group exploration of computer science identity of African American teachers. In Proceedings of the 2019 on computers and people research conference (pp. 78–84).
Hausmann, L. R. M., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and white first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.
Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479). The Guilford Press.
Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. School of American Research Press.
Holloman, T., London, J., Lee, W. C., Pee, C. M., Ash, C. H., & Watford, B. (2021). Underrepresented and overlooked: Insights from a systematic literature review about black graduate students in engineering and computer science. IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 497–511.
Hughes, R. (2012). Gender conception and the chilly road to female undergraduates’ persistence in science and engineering fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 18(3), 215–234.
Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.
Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2015). Career choice and calling: Integrating calling and social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(3), 383–398.
Kapoor, A., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2019). Understanding CS undergraduate students' professional identity through the lens of their professional development. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 9–15).
Kinnunen, P., Butler, M., Morgan, M., Nylen, A., Peters, A. K., Sinclair, J., & Pesonen, E. (2018). Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 201–218.
Kortz, K. M., Cardace, D., & Savage, B. (2020). Affective factors during field research that influence intention to persist in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(2), 133–151.
Kuang, S. (2020). An examination of gender diversity ideologies for women in STEM. Dissertation, Michigan State University.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lehman, K. J. (2019). An untapped recruitment pool: Undecided students in CS1 courses. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Lent, G. H. R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4, 255–311.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4(1), 255–311.
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Sheu, H. B., & Lopez, A. M., Jr. (2011). Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 184–192.
Lundberg, G. M., & Ness, I. J. (2020). First year students' imagination of future employment: Identity as an important employability aspect. In Proceedings of the 9th computer science education research conference (pp. 1–7).
Mahadeo, J., Hazari, Z., & Potvin, G. (2020). Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(1), 1–14.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551.
Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2017). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
McClure, E. R., Guernsey, L., Clements, D. H., Bales, S. N., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levine, M. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and Math education in early childhood. In Joan Ganz Cooney center at sesame workshop. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49(3), 255–289.
McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662.
Mondisa, J.-L., Packard, B. W. L., & Montgomery, B. L. (2021). Understanding what STEM mentoring ecosystems need to thrive: A STEM-ME framework. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(1), 110–135.
Morelock, J. R. (2017). A systematic literature review of engineering identity: Definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1240–1262.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., van der Toorn, J., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2021). Boosting the sustainable representation of women in STEM with evidence-based policy initiatives. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 50–58.
Nelson, W., Cummings, R. T., & Gosha, K. (2019). A qualitative investigation on the effectiveness of a computing identity development emailing list for African American computer scientists. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
Pantic, K., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2019). Factors that influence retention of women in the computer science major: A systematic literature review. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 25(2).
Parker, M. C., Solomon, A., Pritchett, B., Illingworth, D. A., Marguilieux, L. E., & Guzdial, M. (2018, August). Socioeconomic status and computer science achievement: Spatial ability as a mediating variable in a novel model of understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 97-105).
Peters, A. K., & Pears, A. (2013). Engagement in computer science and IT—What! A matter of identity? In 2013 learning and teaching in computing and engineering (pp. 114–121). IEEE.
Peters, A. K., & Rick, D. (2014, November). Identity development in computing education: theoretical perspectives and an implementation in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 70-79).
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94(1), 1–28.
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14.
Riegle-Crumb, C., & Morton, K. (2017). Gendered expectations: Examining how peers shape female students’ intent to pursue STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 329.
Rodriguez, S. L., & Lehman, K. (2017). Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: The need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 229–247.
Santolucito, M., & Piskac, R. (2020). Formal methods and computing identity-based mentorship for early stage researchers. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 135–141).
Sax, L. J., Blaney, J. M., Lehman, K. J., Rodriguez, S. L., George, K. L., & Zavala, C. (2018). Sense of belonging in computing: The role of introductory courses for women and underrepresented minority students. Social Sciences, 7(8), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080122
Serrano Corkin, D. M., Ekmekci, A., & Fisher, A. (2020). Integrating culture, art, geometry, and coding to enhance computer science motivation among underrepresented minoritized high school students. The Urban Review, 52(5), 950–969.
Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500.
Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427.
Shoaib, H., Cardella, M., Madamanchi, A., & Umulis, D. (2019). An investigation of undergraduates’ computational thinking in a sophomore-level biomedical engineering course. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 415–437.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Stone, J., Lynch, C. I., Sjomeling, M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1213–1227.
Strayhorn, T. L. (2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.
Taheri, M. (2019). Exploring computing identity and persistence across multiple groups using structural equation modeling. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference Proceedings.
Taheri, M., Ross, M., Hazari, Z., Weiss, M., Georgiopoulos, M., Christensen, K., & Chari, D. (2018). A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
Taskinen, P. H., Schütte, K., & Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents’ motivation to select an academic science-related career: The role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717–733.
Thomas, E. N., III. (2005). The effects of an ethnic-based mentoring model on college adjustment, grade point average, and retention among first-year African American college students attending a predominantly White institution. Michigan State University.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 82–103).
Von Humboldt, W. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61).
Villanueva, I., Di Stefano, M., Gelles, L., Youmans, K., & Hunt, A. (2020). Development and assessment of a vignette survey instrument to identify responses due to hidden curriculum among engineering students and faculty. IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(5).
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82.
Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. L. (2012). Cultivating diversity and competency in STEM: Challenges and remedies for removing virtual barriers to constructing diverse higher education communities of success. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE: A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 11(1), A44–A51.
Widdicks, K., Ashcroft, A., Winter, E., & Blair, L. (2021). Women’s Sense of Belonging in Computer Science Education: The Need for a Collective Response. In United Kingdom and Ireland Computing Education Research conference (pp. 1–7).
Wong, B. (2016). ‘I’m good, but not that good’: Digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299–317.
Zahedi, L., Batten, J., Ross, M., Potvin, G., Damas, S., Clarke, P., & Davis, D. (2021). Gamification in education: a mixed-methods study of gender on computer science students’ academic performance and identity development. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 441–474.
Zander, C., Boustedt, J., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., & Thomas, L. (2009). Student transformations: Are they computer scientists yet? In Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on computing education research workshop (pp. 129–140).
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. 1831964). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, N., Mondisa, JL., Packard, B.WL. et al. Examining the role of computing identity in the computing experiences of women and racially minoritized undergraduates: a literature review. J Comput High Educ 36, 773–812 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09375-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09375-0