Skip to main content
Log in

Phoneme Recognition by Means of a Growing Hierarchical Recurrent Self-Organizing Model Based on Locally Adapting Neighborhood Radii

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a tree evolutionary recurrent self-organizing model, based on locally adapting neighborhood radii and multiple prototype vectors named GH-Ad-RSOM. It is a variant of the Growing Hierarchical Self-Organizing Map GHSOM. The proposed GHSOM variant is characterized by a hierarchical model, composed of independent RSOMs (many RSOM), based on a locally adapting neighborhood radii and multiple prototype vectors. The method shows better robustness of GH-Ad-RSOM and high vowel classification rates compared to classic GHSOM and other variant of GHSOM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohonen T. The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 1998;21(1–3):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohonen T, Kaski S, Lagus K, Honkela T. Very large twolevel SOM for the browsing of newsgroups In: Proceedings of the international conference on neural networks (ICANN’96), Bochum, Germany, pp 269–274; 1996.

  3. Koikkalainen P, Oja E. Self-organizing hierarchical feature maps. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN 1990), San Diego, CA; 1990.

  4. Laaksonen JT, Koskela JM, Laakso SP, Oja E. PicSOM—content-based image retrieval with self-organizing maps. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2000;21:1199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laaksonen J, Koskela M, Laakso S, Oja E. Self-organizing maps as a relevance feedback technique in content-based image retrieval. Pattern Anal Appl. 2001;4(2–3):140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luttrell SP. Hierarchical self-organizing networks. In: Proceedings of the international conference on neural networks (ICANN’89), 2–6, London; 1989.

  7. Lampinen J, Oja E. Clustering properties of hierarchical self-organizing maps. J Math Imaging Vis. 1992;2:261–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dittenbach M, Rauber A, Polzlbauer. Investigation of alternative strategies and quality measures for controlling the growth process of the growing hierarchical self-organizing map. In: Proceeding of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN2005), pp 2954–2959; 2005.

  9. Dittenbach M, Merkl D, Rauber A. The growing hierarchical self-organizing map In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), 6, pp 15–19; 2000.

  10. Pakkanen J, Iivarinen J, Oja E. The evolving tree—a novel self-organizing network for data analysis. Neural Process Lett. 2004;20(3):199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichodzijewski P, Zincir-Heywood AN, Heywood MI. Host-based intrusion detection using self-organizing maps In: IEEE International joint conference on neural networks, pp 1714–1719; 2002.

  12. Varsta M, Heikkonnen J, Millan JDR. Context learning with the self-organizing map In: Proceedings of workshop on self-organizing maps, Helsinki University of Technology, pp 197–202; 1997.

  13. Zhou J, Fu Y. Clustering high-dimensional data using growing SOM, Advances in Neural Networks ISNN 2005, Springer, 3497: 63–68; 2005.

  14. LiuY, Tian D, Li B. A wireless intrusion detection method based on dynamic growing neural network. In: First international multi-symposiums on computer and computational sciences (IMSCCS’06), vol. 2, pp 611–615; 2006.

  15. Fritzke B. Growing grid—a self-organizing network with constant neighborhood range and adaptation strength. Neural Process Lett. 1995;2:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tangsripairoj S, Samadzadeh MH. Organizing and visualizing software repositories using the growing hierarchical self-organizing map. J Inf Sci Eng. 2006;22:283–95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pampalk E, Widmer G, Chan A. A new approach to hierarchical clustering and structuring of data with self-organizing maps. Intell Data Anal J. 2004;8(2):131–49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiviluoto K. Topology preservation in self-organizing maps. In: Proceeding of international conference on neural networks (ICNN), pp 294–299; 1996.

  19. Najet A, Noureddine E. Cooperative supervised and unsupervised learning algorithm for phoneme recognition in continuous speech and seaker-independent context. Elsevier Science, Neurocomputing, Special Issue on Neural Pattern Recognition, vol 51, pp 225–235; 2003.

  20. Najet A. Speech clustering by means of self organizing maps. In: Tunisan-German conference on smart systems and devices, Hammamet-Tunisia, pp 27–30; 2001.

  21. Jlassi C, Arous N, Ellouze N. Comparative study of growing hierarchical SOM variants case study: phoneme recognition. Int Rev Comput Software IRECOS. 2008;3(2):120–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jlassi C, Arous N, Ellouze N. The growing hierarchical recurrent self organizing map for phoneme recognition In: ISCA tutoriel and research workshop on non-linear speech processing, NOLISP; 2009.

  23. Trimm DM. Evolving neural networks-evolutionary algorithms and self-organising maps. School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. B15 2TT. Student projects. Posters; 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiraz Jlassi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jlassi, C., Arous, N. & Ellouze, N. Phoneme Recognition by Means of a Growing Hierarchical Recurrent Self-Organizing Model Based on Locally Adapting Neighborhood Radii. Cogn Comput 2, 142–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-010-9036-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-010-9036-5

Keywords

Navigation