Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Word Polarity Disambiguation Using Bayesian Model and Opinion-Level Features

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contextual polarity ambiguity is an important problem in sentiment analysis. Many opinion keywords carry varying polarities in different contexts, posing huge challenges for sentiment analysis research. Previous work on contextual polarity disambiguation makes use of term-level context, such as words and patterns, and resolves the polarity with a range of rule-based, statistics-based or machine learning methods. The major shortcoming of these methods lies in that the term-level features sometimes are ineffective in resolving the polarity. In this work, opinion-level context is explored, in which intra-opinion features and inter-opinion features are finely defined. To enable effective use of opinion-level features, the Bayesian model is adopted to resolve the polarity in a probabilistic manner. Experiments with the Opinmine corpus demonstrate that opinion-level features can make a significant contribution in word polarity disambiguation in four domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Balahur A, Montoyo A. Opal: applying opinion mining techniques for the disambiguation of sentiment ambiguous adjectives in semeval-2 task 18. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation., SemEval’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010; p. 444–7.

  2. Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic computing: techniques, tools, and applications. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cambria E, Olsher D, Rajagopal D. SenticNet 3: a common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis. In: AAAI. Quebec City; 2014. p. 1515–21.

  4. Cambria E, Schuller B, Xia Y, Havasi C. New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intell Syst. 2013;28(2):15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cambria E, White B. Jumping NLP curves: a review of natural language processing research. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2014;9(2):48–57.

  6. Ding X, Liu B, Yu PS. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining., WSDM’08. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2008. p. 231–40.

  7. Dong Z, Dong Q. Hownet and the computation of meaning. River Edge, NJ, USA: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Esuli A, Sebastiani F. Sentiwordnet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC06), pp. 417–422 (2006).

  9. Hatzivassiloglou V, McKeown KR. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and eighth conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics., ACL’98. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 1997. p. 174–81.

  10. He Y, Alani H, Zhou D: Exploring english lexicon knowledge for chinese sentiment analysis. In: CIPS-SIGHAN Joint conference on Chinese language processing (2010).

  11. Lu B, Tsou BK. Cityu-dac: Disambiguating sentiment-ambiguous adjectives within context. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation., SemEval’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010. p. 292–5.

  12. Pak A, Paroubek P. Twitter based system: using twitter for disambiguating sentiment ambiguous adjectives. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation., SemEval’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010. p. 436–9.

  13. Popescu AM, Etzioni O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing., HLT’05. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2005. p. 339–46.

  14. Poria S, Cambria E, Winterstein G, Huang GB. Sentic patterns: dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems (2014).

  15. Qiu L, Zhang W, Hu C, Zhao K. Selc: a self-supervised model for sentiment classification. In: CIKM, pp. 929–936 (2009).

  16. Torii Y, Das D, Bandyopadhyay S, Okumura M. Developing japanese wordnet affect for analyzing emotions. Proceedings of the 2Nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis., WASSA’11. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2011. p. 80–6.

  17. Turney PD. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics., ACL’02. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2002. p. 417–24.

  18. Turney PD, Littman ML. Measuring praise and criticism: inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2003;21(4):315–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing., HLT’05. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2005. p. 347–54.

  20. Wu Y, Jin P. Semeval-2010 task 18: disambiguating sentiment ambiguous adjectives. Lang Resour Eval. 2013;47(3):743–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Wen M. Disambiguating dynamic sentiment ambiguous adjectives. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics., COLING’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010. p. 1191–9.

  22. Xia Y, Hao B, Wong KF. Opinion target network and bootstrapping method for chinese opinion target extraction. Proceedings of the 5th Asia information retrieval symposium on information retrieval technology., AIRS’09. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 339–50.

  23. Xia Y, Wang L, Wong KF, Xu M. Sentiment vector space model for lyric-based song sentiment classification. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the association for computational linguistics on human language technologies: short papers., ACL-Short’08. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2008. p. 133–6.

  24. Xu R, Xia Y, Wong KF, Li W. Opinion annotation in on-line chinese product reviews. In: LREC (2008).

  25. Xu R, Xu J, Kit C. Hitsz\_cityu. Combine collocation, context words and neighboring sentence sentiment in sentiment adjectives disambiguation. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation., SemEval’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010. p. 448–51.

  26. Yang SC, Liu MJ. Ysc-dsaa: an approach to disambiguate sentiment ambiguous adjectives based on saaol. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation., SemEval’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for computational linguistics; 2010. p. 440–3.

  27. Yi J, Nasukawa T, Bunescu R, Niblack W. Sentiment analyzer: extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international conference on data mining, ICDM’03, p. 427. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by NSFC (61272233) and the Royal Society of Edinburgh. We are grateful to the reviewers for their invaluable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, TNList, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Yunqing Xia & Huan Zhao

  2. School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Erik Cambria

  3. Division of Computing Science and Maths, School of Natural Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK

    Amir Hussain

Authors
  1. Yunqing Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erik Cambria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunqing Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y., Cambria, E., Hussain, A. et al. Word Polarity Disambiguation Using Bayesian Model and Opinion-Level Features. Cogn Comput 7, 369–380 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9298-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9298-4

Keywords