Skip to main content
Log in

A Computational Approach of the French Flag Model to Connect Growth and Specification in Developmental Biology

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Introduction

The study of the mechanisms that link the global system behavior to the interaction of its parts is an important issue to the field of complex systems. This occurs in many natural systems in biology, ecology and physics. Nature-inspired computation tries to capture and exploit natural solutions in order to solve real problems in many different fields such as telecommunication networks, architecture and urban spaces design, sociology or economy planning. The main purpose of the present research is the creation of a computational path connecting a set of low-level interactions with high-level emerging behaviors. The low-level interactions are modeled by very simple neighbor binary rules. The upper level highlights a regular pattern formation. This framework has been applied to approach the pattern formation in the vertebrate limb development under the scope of the French Flag model.

Methods

We have developed a four-level theoretical framework. The lowest level defines a set of neighbor binary rules. The second level comes from the iterative application of these rules on sequences of binary values. The resulting sequences are interpreted as arithmetic function values, in binary or decimal representation. The third level highlights a set of computational primitives that have the capability to build directly the function values. Any function can be carried out by means of a particular combination of these primitives, denoted seed behavior. In the fourth level, the emergent behavioral effect is highlighted as a scaling process of the seed behavior.

Results

Some functions that have been defined by the four-level framework have been successfully applied to model the French Flag model (progressive specification, intercalary specification and early specification) which is a well-known approach to the pattern formation in the vertebrate limb development.

Conclusions

Our empirical research highlights it is possible to develop a computational model which connects very simple rules to complex behavioral patterns. The way consists of a hierarchical organization of computing embedded steps. Our model provides a numerical and geometrical counterpart to the French Flag model and therefore proves its capability to be a formal basis to the case of vertebrate limb development. These encouraging results suggest as a future work the improvement in this model. The composition of functions must be explored as well as new combinations of building primitives in order to identify more emergent effects. More, the relevance of quantitative emergent effects must be highlighted in future applications to natural cases. It is expected that the development of these operations will help addressing new issues such as truncation and graft in vertebrate limbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siddique N, Adeli H. Nature inspired computing: an overview and some future directions. Cogn Comput. 2015;7(6):706–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Green JBA, Sharpe J. Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine. Co Biol Ltd Dev. 2015;142:1203–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolpert L, et al. Principles of development. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knabe JF et al. Evolution and morphogenesis of differentiated multicellular organisms: autonomously generated diffusion gradients for positional information. In: Artificial Life XI: proceedings of the eleventh international conference on the simulation and synthesis of living systems; 2008.

  5. Sommer AP, et al. On the social behaviour of cells. J Bionic Eng. 2010;7(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bacanin N et al. Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for portfolio optimization problem. In: Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference (GASTR ‘13); 2013. p. 163.

  7. Eldos T et al. Adapting the ant colony optimization algorithm to the printed circuit board drilling problem. In: Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on signal processing (SIP ‘13), in recent researches in telecommunications, informatics, electronics and signal processing; 2013. p. 58.

  8. Spector L, et al. Emergence of collective behavior in evolving populations of flying agents. Genet Progr Evol Mach. 2005;6(1):111–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chazelle B. The convergence of bird flocking. J ACM 61; 2014.

  10. Moussaid M, et al. Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks and crowds. Top Cogn Sci. 2009;1:469–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moussaïd M, Nelson JD. Simple heuristics and the modelling of crowds behaviour. In: Weidmann U, Editor. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ullah A et al. Towards a biologically inspired soft switching approach for cloud resource provisioning. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arvin F et al. Development of an autonomous micro robot for swarm robotics. In: Proceedings of ICMA. IEEE; 2014. pp. 635–640.

  14. Wilson PA, Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. Affective robotics: modelling and testing cultural prototypes. Cogn Comput. 2014;6(4):814–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farooq U et al. A multifaceted approach to modeling agent trust for effective communication in the application of mobile ad hoc vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev. 2011;41(3):407–20.

  16. Ducatelle F. Cooperative navigation in robotic swarms. Swarm Intell. 2014;1:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kötteritzsch A, Weyers B. Assistive technologies for older adults in urban areas: a literature review. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(2):299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstock M. Emergence and the forms of cities. Arch Des. 2010;80(3):118–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Dabass D. Nature-inspired knowledge mining algorithms for emergent behaviour discovery in economic models. In: Jean-Philippe Rennard editor. Handbook of research on nature-inspired computing for economics and management; 2007.

  20. Signes MT et al. Resilience modeling by means of a set of recursive functions. In: Proceedings of 43rd annual IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks; 2013.

  21. Signes MT et al. An approach to stigmergy issues based on the recursive applications of binary elementary operations. In: Proceedings of world conference on information systems and technologies; 2014.

  22. Signes MT et al. Computational primitive to model the emergence of behavioral patterns. In: Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS international conference on automatic control, soft computing and human-machine interaction in recent advances in electrical engineering series 4; 2015.

  23. Signes MT et al. An approach to computations in living tissues based on logic functions. In: Proceedings of EUROMICRO international conference on parallel, distributed and network-based processing; 2012.

  24. Kutrib M. Nature-based problems in cellular automata. In: Proceedings of CIE 2011. LNCS models of computation in context. Vol. 6735, Springer, Berlin; 2011. pp. 171–180.

  25. Towers M, Tickle C. Growing models of vertebrate limb development. Development. 2009;136:179–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tong Q. Embryonic development and the physiological factors that coordinate hatching in domestic chickens. Oxford J Sci Math Poultry Sci. 2013;92(3):620–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Teresa Signes Pont.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Maria Teresa Signes Pont, Higinio Mora Mora and Juan Manuel García Chamizo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not required as no human or animals were involved.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Signes Pont, M.T., Mora Mora, H. & García Chamizo, J.M. A Computational Approach of the French Flag Model to Connect Growth and Specification in Developmental Biology. Cogn Comput 8, 1057–1063 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9426-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9426-4

Keywords

Navigation