Skip to main content
Log in

Scaffold-A549: A Benchmark 3D Fluorescence Image Dataset for Unsupervised Nuclei Segmentation

  • Topical Collection: Big Data Analytics
  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general trend of nuclei segmentation is the transition from two-dimensional to three-dimensional nuclei segmentation and from traditional image processing methods to data-driven cognitively inspired methods. Existing nuclei segmentation datasets do not meet this trend: They either do not contain enough samples for training the deep learning model or not contain challenging 3D structure. Thus, large-scale datasets are critically demanded for nuclei segmentation tasks. In this paper, we introduce a new benchmark nuclei segmentation dataset termed as Scaffold-A549 for 3D cell culture on bio-scaffold. The A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells are seeded in the bio-scaffold for cell culture and the samples with different density of nuclei are captured using confocal laser scanning microscope at the first, third, and eighth culture day. A total of 21 3D images are collected containing more than 10,000 nucleus and each of the images containing more than 800 nucleus are annotated manually for evaluation. Scaffold-A549 presents one large, diverse, challenging, and publicly available dataset and can be widely used for the research on 3D unsupervised nuclei segmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Scaffold-A549 is available at: https://github.com/Kaiseem/Scaffold-A549.

References

  1. Mathew B, Schmitz A, Muñoz-Descalzo S, Ansari N, Pampaloni F, Stelzer EH, Fischer SC. Robust and automated three-dimensional segmentation of densely packed cell nuclei in different biological specimens with lines-of-sight decomposition. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutin ME, Voss TC, Titus SA, Cruz-Gutierrez K, Michael S, Ferrer M. A high-throughput imaging and nuclear segmentation analysis protocol for cleared 3d culture models. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wählby C, Sintorn I-M, Erlandsson F, Borgefors G, Bengtsson E. Combining intensity, edge and shape information for 2d and 3d segmentation of cell nuclei in tissue sections. J Microsc. 2004;215(1):67–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nandy K, Chellappa R, Kumar A, Lockett SJ. Segmentation of nuclei from 3d microscopy images of tissue via graphcut optimization. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Proces. 2015;10(1):140–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blin G, Sadurska D, Migueles RP, Chen N, Watson JA, Lowell S. Nessys: a novel method for accurate nuclear segmentation in 3d. bioRxiv 2018:502872.

  6. Gertych A, Ma Z, Tajbakhsh J, Velásquez-Vacca A, Knudsen BS. Rapid 3-d delineation of cell nuclei for high-content screening platforms. Comput Biol Med. 2016;69:328–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svoboda D, Kozubek M, Stejskal S. Generation of digital phantoms of cell nuclei and simulation of image formation in 3d image cytometry. Cytometry Part A: The Journal of the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. 2009;75(6):494–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang K, Hussain A, Wang Q, Zhang R. Deep learning: fundamentals, theory and applications. Springer, 2019.

  9. Yang J, Dvornek NC, Zhang F, Chapiro J, Lin M, Duncan JS. Unsupervised domain adaptation via disentangled representations: Application to cross-modality liver segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2019:255–263.

  10. Osokin A, Chessel A, Salas REC, Vaggi F. Gans for biological image synthesis, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2017:2252–2261.

  11. Hou L, Agarwal A, Samaras D, Kurc TM, Gupta RR, Saltz JH. Robust histopathology image analysis: To label or to synthesize?, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019.

  12. Ihle S, Reichmuth A, Girardin S, Han H, Stauffer F, Bonnin A, Stampanoni M, Voros J, Forro C. Udct: Unsupervised data to content transformation with histogram-matching cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2019;1:461–470.

  13. Siddiquee MMR, Zhou Z, Tajbakhsh N, Feng R, Gotway MB, Bengio Y, Liang J. Learning fixed points in generative adversarial networks: From image-to-image translation to disease detection and localization, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019.

  14. Amin J, Sharif M, Gul N, Kadry S, Chakraborty C. Quantum machine learning architecture for covid-19 classification based on synthetic data generation using conditional adversarial neural network. Cogn Comput 2021:1–12.

  15. Qian Z, Huang K, Wang Q-F, Xiao J, Zhang R. Generative adversarial classifier for handwriting characters super-resolution. Pattern Recogn. 2020;107:107453.

  16. Liu Q, Gaeta IM, Millis BA, Tyska MJ, Huo Y. Gan based unsupervised segmentation: should we match the exact number of objects, in: Medical Imaging 2021: Image Processing, Vol. 11596, International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2021:1159613.

  17. Zhu J-Y, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017.

  18. Böhland M, Scherr T, Bartschat A, Mikut R, Reischl M. Influence of synthetic label image object properties on gan supported segmentation pipelines, in: Proceedings 29th Workshop Computational Intelligence. 2019:289–305.

  19. Fu C, Lee S, Ho DJ, Han S, Salama P, Dunn KW, Delp EJ. Three dimensional fluorescence microscopy image synthesis and segmentation, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 2018:2302–2310.

  20. Dunn KW, Fu C, Ho DJ, Lee S, Han S, Salama P, Delp EJ. Deepsynth: Three-dimensional nuclear segmentation of biological images using neural networks trained with synthetic data. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Claire MQ, Allen G, Vasiliy C, Lee K, Cimini BA, Karhohs KW, Minh D, Ding L, Rafelski SM, Derek T. Cellprofiler 3.0: Next-generation image processing for biology, Plos Biology 2018;16(7):e2005970–.

  22. Rizk A, Paul G, Incardona P, Bugarski M, Mansouri M, Niemann A, Ziegler U, Berger P, Sbalzarini IF. Segmentation and quantification of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images using squassh. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(3):586–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu C, Zhmoginov A, Sandler M. Cyclegan, a master of steganography, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.02950

  24. Mathew S, Nadeem S, Kumari S, Kaufman A. Augmenting colonoscopy using extended and directional cyclegan for lossy image translation, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by the following: National Natural Science Foundation of China under no.61876155; Jiangsu Science and Technology Programme (Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province) under no. BK20181189, BE2020006-4; Key Program Special Fund in XJTLU under no. KS-A-09, KSF-A-10, KSF-T-06, KSF-E-26, KSF-E-37.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kaizhu Huang or Jie Sun.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, K., Huang, K., Sun, J. et al. Scaffold-A549: A Benchmark 3D Fluorescence Image Dataset for Unsupervised Nuclei Segmentation. Cogn Comput 13, 1603–1608 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09944-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09944-4

Keywords

Navigation