Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Five Inspiring Course (Re-)Designs

Examples of Innovations in Teaching and Learning BISE

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. https://crowde.net/.

References

  • Bork D, Fill HG, Karagiannis D, Miron ET, Tantouris N (2015) Walch M (2015) Conceptual modelling for smart cities: a teaching case. Interact Des Archit 27:10–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Buchmann R, Hawryszkiewycz I, Karagiannis D, Tantouris N, Walch M (2016) Using conceptual modeling to support innovation challenges in smart cities. In: 14th IEEE international conference on smart city, Sydney, pp 1317–1324

  • Bork D, Buchmann RA, Karagiannis D, Moonkun L, Miron ET (2019) An open platform for modeling method conceptualization: The OMiLAB digital ecosystem. Commun Assoc Inf Syst (under review)

  • Buchmann RA, Ghiran AM (2017) Engineering the cooking recipe modelling method: a teaching experience report. In: Proceedings of PrOse 2017, CEUR-WS 1999(5). ftp://SunSITE.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE/pub/publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-1999.zip. Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  • Crook C, Schofield L (2017) The video lecture. Internet High Educ 34:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieterle S, Koschmider A, Reichenberger T, Schoder D (2018) Crowde: Individuelles Lernen durch individualisierte Klausuren. In: Krömker D, Schroeder U (Eds.) DeLFI 2018 - Die 16. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 10.-13. September 2018. Lecture notes in informatics, vol 248, pp 287–288

  • Erenli K (2016) Generation I(mmersion) – how to meet learner expectations of tomorrow. Int J Adv Corp Learn 9(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo PJ, Kim J, Rubin R (2014) How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: 1st ACM conference on learning @ Scale, Atlanta, pp 41–50

  • Guthrie CH (2014) Who are we teaching? The learning expectations of “digital tribes” in the classroom. Int J e-Educ e-Bus e-Manag e-Learn 4(2):146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J, Timperley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77(1):81–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung R, Lehrer C (2017) Guidelines for education in business and information systems engineering at tertiary institutions. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(3):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D (2016) Conceptual modelling methods: the AMME agile engineering approach. In: International conference on informatics in economy, LNBIP 273, Springer, pp 3–19

  • Karagiannis D, Buchmann RA, Burzynski P, Reimer U, Walch M (2016a) Fundamental conceptual modeling languages in OMiLAB. In: Domain-specific conceptual modeling. Springer, Cham pp 3–30

  • Karagiannis D, Mayr HC, Mylopoulos J (2016b) Domain-specific conceptual modeling. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Burzynski P, Miron ET (2017) The IMKER case study. http://vienna.omilab.org/repo/files/Bee-Up/The_IMKER_Case_Study.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2018

  • Koschmider A, Buschfeld D (2016) Shifting the process of exam preparation towards active learning: a crowdsourcing based approach. In: Informatik 2016. Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol 259

  • Koschmider A, Schaarschmidt M (2017) A crowdsourcing-based learning approach to activate active learning. In: DeLFI & Bildungsräume 2017, Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol 273, pp 99–10

  • Krathwohl DR (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract 41:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann K, Söllner M, Leimeister JM (2015) Der Wert von IT-gestütztem Peer Assessment zur Unterstützung des Lernens in einer universitären Massenlehrveranstaltung. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/239338/. Accessed 19 Dec 2018

  • McPherson MS, Bacow LS (2015) Online higher education: beyond the hype cycle. J Econ Perspect 29(4):135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österle H, Becker J, Frank U, Hess T, Karagiannis D, Krcmar H, Loos P, Mertens P, Oberweis A, Sinz E (2011) Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst 20(1):7–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinzaru F, Vatamanescu E, Mitan A, Vitelar A, Savulescu R, Noaghea C, Balan M (2016) Millennials at work: investigating the specificity of generation Y versus other generations. Manag Dyn Knowl Econ 4(2):173–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandkuhl K, Fill HG, Hoppenbrouwers S, Krogstie J, Leue A, Matthes F, Opdahl A, Schwabe G, Uludag O, Winter R (2016) Enterprise modelling for the masses—from elitist discipline to common practice. In: Proceedings of PoEM 2016, LNBIP 267, Springer, pp 225–240

  • Sedrakyan G, Snoeck M (2017) Cognitive feedback and behavioral feedforward automation perspectives for modeling and validation in a learning context. In: International conference on model-driven engineering and software development. CCIS, vol 692, Springer, pp 70–92

  • Sedrakyan G, Snoeck M, Poelmans S (2014) Assessing the effectiveness of feedback enabled simulation in teaching conceptual modeling. Comput Educ 78:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedrakyan G, De Weerdt J, Snoeck M (2016) Process-mining enabled feedback: “tell me what I did wrong” vs. “tell me how to do it right”. Comput Hum Behav 57:352–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedrakyan G, Poelmans S, Snoeck M (2017) Assessing the influence of feedback-inclusive rapid prototyping on understanding the semantics of parallel UML statecharts by novice modelers. Inf Softw Technol 82:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serral Asensio E, Snoeck M (2016) Conceptual framework for feedback automation in SLEs. Smart Educ E-Learn. Springer, Cham, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Serral Asensio E, De Weerdt J, Sedrakyan G, Snoeck M (2016) Automating immediate and personalized feedback taking conceptual modelling education to a next level. In: IEEE 10th international conference on research challenges in information science, Grenoble, p 439

  • Snoeck M, Haesen R, Buelens H, De Backer M, Monsieur G (2007) Computer aided modelling exercises. Inform Educ 6(1):231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer JF (2012) How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn Environ Res 15(2):171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strecker S, Kundisch D, Lehner F, Leimeister JM, Schubert P (2018) Higher education and the opportunities and challenges of educational technology. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(2):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The ADOxx metamodeling platform (2018) https://www.adoxx.org/. Accessed 2 July 2018

  • The BEE-UP Modeling Tool (2018) http://austria.omilab.org/psm/content/bee-up. Accessed 2 July 2018

  • The OMiLAB web portal (2018) http://austria.omilab.org/. Accessed 2 July 2018

  • Van Merriënboer JJ, Kirschner PA (2012) Ten steps to complex learning: a systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walch M (2018) Operating cyber-physical systems with microservices: the s*IoT conceptual modelling approach. In: Accepted for 7th international congress on advanced applied informatics, Yonago

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany

    Stefan Strecker &  Ulrike Baumöl

  2. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Dimitris Karagiannis

  3. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Agnes Koschmider

  4. KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Monique Snoeck

  5. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Rüdiger Zarnekow

Authors
  1. Stefan Strecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrike Baumöl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dimitris Karagiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Agnes Koschmider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Monique Snoeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rüdiger Zarnekow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Strecker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strecker, S., Baumöl, U., Karagiannis, D. et al. Five Inspiring Course (Re-)Designs. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61, 241–252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00584-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00584-5