Skip to main content
Log in

Application of free interaction theory in swept shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fin-generated swept shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions were experimentally investigated via nanoparticle-based planar laser scattering method, surface oil flow visualizations, surface pressure measurements, and particle image velocimetry. Surface plateau pressure is also theoretically predicted. The plateau pressure of present quasi-conical swept shock interaction is dependent on the local skin friction coefficient and normal Mach number component, and can be predicted per a criterion deduced from free interaction theory. Visualizations and surface pressure measurements confirm that the surface plateau pressure data are equal to the pressure downstream of the separation shock; the upstream influence line is parallel to the impingement line of the separation shock on the flat plate. These observations support the free interaction theory as-applied to quasi-conical swept shock interactions.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvi FS, Settles GS (1990) Structure of swept shock wave/boundary-layer interactions using conical shadowgraphy. AIAA Paper 90-1644

  • Alvi FS, Settles GS (1991) A physical model of the swept shock wave/boundary-layer interaction flowfield. AIAA Paper 91-1768

  • Babinsky H, Harvey JK (2011) Shock wave–boundary-layer interactions. Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DR, Kuehn DM, Larson HK (1958) Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Rept. 1356

  • Charwat AF (1970) Supersonic flows with imbedded separated regions. Adv Heat Transf 6:1–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles D (1953) Measurements in the boundary layer on a smooth flat plate in supersonic flow. Ph.D. Thesis, California institute of technology, California

  • Deng XY, Liao JH (1991) Correlative behaviours of shock/boundary layer interaction induced by sharp fin and semicone. AIAA Paper 91-1756

  • Deng XY, Liao JH, Zhang H (1993) Improvement of conical similarity rule in swept shock wave/boundary layer interaction. AIAA Paper 93-2941

  • Gang DD, Yi SH, He L (2016) Characteristics of the cylinder-induced shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interactions. J Vis 19:581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarini SE, Moser RD, Shariff K, Wray A (2000) Direct numerical simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer at Mach 2.5. J Fluid Mech 414:1–33

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JR (1977) Prediction techniques for the characteristics of fin generated three dimensional shock waves turbulent boundary layer interactions. AFFDL-TR-77-10

  • Lu FK (1993) Quasiconical free interaction between a swept shock and a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 31(4):686–692

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lu FS, Settles GS, Horstman CC (1990) Mach number effects on conical surface features of swept shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. AIAA J 28(1):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schülein E, Zheltovodov AA (2001) Documentation of experimental data for hypersonic 3-D shock waves/turbulent boundary layer interaction flows. DLR report. IB 223-99 A 26

  • Settles GS, Lu FK (1985) Conical similarity of shock/boundary-layer interactions generated by swept and unswept fins. AIAA J 23(7):1021–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles GS, Kimmel RL (1986) Similarity of quasiconical shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions. AIAA J 24(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y, Liu WD, Fan XQ (2016) Flow visualization for shock-induced boundary-layer separation extended to the flat-plate-leading edge. J Vis 20:231–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0393-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudheusden BW, Nebbeling C, Bannink WJ (1996) Topological interpretation of the surface flow visualization of conical viscous/inviscid interactions. J Fluid Mech 316:115–137

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZG, Zhao YL, Zhao YX, Fan XQ (2015) Prediction of massive separation of unstarted inlet via free-interaction theory. AIAA J 53:1108–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YL (2014) The study of separated flow modeling and unstart mechanism of hypersonic inlet. Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, China

  • Zhao YX, Yi SH, Tian LF, Cheng ZY (2009) Supersonic flow imaging via nanoparticles. Sci Chi Ser E 52:3640–3648

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zheltovodov AA (1996) Shock waves/turbulent boundary-layer interactions- fundamental studies and applications. AIAA Paper 96-1977

  • Zukoski EE (1967) Turbulent boundary-layer separation in front of a forward-facing step. AIAA J 5(10):1746–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11472304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, G., Zhou, J. & Zhao, Yx. Application of free interaction theory in swept shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. J Vis 21, 203–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-017-0454-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-017-0454-2

Keywords

Navigation