Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study of square riblets effects on delta wing using smoke visualization and force measurement

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riblets are effective approach to improve the aerodynamic performance of low speed wing configurations. For a delta type wing, it is important to alleviate the flow features such as large rollup and tip vortices in low Reynolds number. In this paper, for first time, the effect of the square riblets on delta wings is studied. In the first step, flow visualization is accomplished to find out the effects of riblets on the flow pattern. For this purpose, two slender delta wings with and without riblet are examined in a vertical wind tunnel in which smoke stream lines are passed over the delta wings to visualize the flow pattern. The visualization tests are performed at five angles of attack; i.e., 0, 10, 20, 30 and 35 degrees. The results of flow visualization indicate that considerable improvements are obtained because of delaying flow separation at high attack angles. In the second step, the aerodynamic performance of the two delta wings are quantitatively evaluated by measuring the lift and drag forces using two load cells in another wind tunnel. The force tests are performed at attack angles of 5–65 degrees with 5-degree step sizes. The measured forces show that the riblets decreases the drag coefficient for all attack angles and increase the lift to drag ratio more than 12 percent for 5–20 degrees attack angles.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson Jr JD (2010). Fundamentals of aerodynamics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education

  • Bandyopadhyay PR, Hellum AM (2014) Modeling how shark and dolphin skin patterns control transitional wall-turbulence vorticity patterns using spatiotemporal phase reset mechanisms. Sci Rep 4:6650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechert D, Bruse M, Hage WV, Van der Hoeven JT, Hoppe G (1997) Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech 338:59–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechert D, Bruse M, Hage W (2000) Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin. Exp Fluids 28(5):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bixler GD (2013) Bioinspired surface for low drag, self-cleaning, and antifouling: shark skin, butterfly and rice leaf effects. The Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Caram J, Ahmed A (1991) Effect of riblets on turbulence in the wake of an airfoil. AIAA J 29(11):1769–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi K, Pearcey H, Savill A (1987). Test of drag reducing riblets on a one-third scale racing yacht. Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means

  • Choi H, Moin P, Kim J (1993) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech 255:503–539

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coustols E, Cousteix J (1990) Experimental investigation of turbulent boundary layers manipulated with internal devices: riblets. In: Gyr A (ed) Structure of turbulence and drag reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 577–584

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coustols E, Savill A (1992) Turbulent skin-friction drag reduction by active and passive means: paper reprinted from AGARD report 786. Pts 1:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Coustols E, Schmitt V (1990). Synthesis of experimental riblet studies in transonic conditions. In: Turbulence control by passive means, Springer, p 123–140

  • Daniel TL (1981) Fish mucus: in situ measurements of polymer drag reduction. Biol Bull 160(3):376–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean B, Bhushan B (2010) Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond A 368(1929):4775–4806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman A, Breitsamter C (2013) Turbulent and unsteady flow characteristics of delta wing vortex systems. Aerosp Sci Technol 24(1):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursul I (1994) Unsteady flow phenomena over delta wings at high angle of attack. AIAA J 32(2):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegelman J, Roos F (1990) The flowfields of bursting vortices over moderately swept delta wings. 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting

  • Lee M, Ho C-M (1989) Vortex dynamics of delta wings. Springer, Front Exp Fluid Mech, pp 365–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclean J, George-Falvy, Sullivan P (1987). Flight-test of turbulent skin-friction reduction by riblets. Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means, p 408–424

  • Michael JW (1983) Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. AIAA J 21(4):485–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro CD, Krus P, Jouannet C (2005) Implications of scale effect for the prediction of high angle of attack aerodynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 41(3):301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PK, Tran DT, Mori K, Hoang TKD, Do MT (2016). Turbulent flow effects on high sweep-back angle delta wing at low reynolds number. 2016 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE)

  • Nieuwstadt FTM, Van Dam W, Leijdens H, Pulles C (1986). Some turbulence measurements above a grooved wall. Proc. European Drag Reduction. Lausanne

  • Pulles CJA (1988). Drag reduction of turbulent boundary layers by means of grooved surfaces, Ph. D. Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology

  • Rinoie K (2001) Flow field measurements of leading-edge separation vortex formed on a delta wing with vortex flaps. J Vis 4(2):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sareen A, Deters RW, Henry SP, Selig MS (2014) Drag reduction using riblet film applied to airfoils for wind turbines. J Sol Energy Eng 136(2):021007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G, Naimuddin M, Chopra G, Sinha J, Sharma G (2016). Numerical analysis of flow field over compound delta wing at subsonic and supersonic speeds. 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference

  • Shen L, Wen C-Y (2016). Leading edge vortex control on a delta wing with dielectric barrier discharge actuators. ASME 2016 fluids engineering division summer meeting collocated with the ASME 2016 heat transfer summer conference and the ASME 2016 14th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  • Sohn MH, Lee KY, Chang JW (2008) Delta-wing vortex visualization using micro-sized water droplets generated by an ultrasonic humidifier. J Vis 11(4):337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire L (1987) Some experiences of riblets at transonic speeds, turbulent drag reduction by passive means. R Aero Soc: 392–407

  • Walsh MJ (1980) Drag characteristics of V-groove and transverse curvature riblets. Viscous Drag Reduct 72:168–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh M, Lindemann A (1984) Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh MJ, Sellers WL III, Walsh MJ, Mcginley CB (1989) Riblet drag at flight conditions. J Aircr 26(6):570–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Brain Pool Program through the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies (KOFST) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Nili-Ahmadabadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radmanesh, M., Nili-Ahmadabadi, M., Nematollahi, O. et al. Experimental study of square riblets effects on delta wing using smoke visualization and force measurement. J Vis 21, 421–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0472-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0472-8

Keywords

Navigation