Abstract
Given a research field, there are usually multiple conferences with different sizes and characteristics, and not all researchers have equal participations in all those conferences. For a conference organizer, knowing the level of involvements by the researchers in the field will allow them to put effort into broadening the participation and enrich the research scope. For researchers, knowing the different strengths and focuses of those conferences also allows them to enhance the effectiveness of their effort and the visibility of their works. In recent years, analyzing scientific literature by visualization has become a popular topic, but most of them focus only on the overall characteristics of publications such as authors, citations, and topics. This study focuses on the analysis and comparisons of academic conferences. In this paper, we present the Conference Orange, a new visual metaphor for analyzing and comparing the characteristics of multiple conferences. First, we propose an assessment framework to describe the maturity of the conferences. Second, we map the metrics in the framework to different diagrams for visual analysis and comparison. Third, we design and implement ConfVisExplorer, a multi-view interactive visual system that combines these diagrams, which helps users to explore the structure of the conferences and the attributes in context, such as authors and institutions. Finally, we conduct case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the system.
Graphic abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergstrom P, Atkinson DC (2009) Augmenting the exploration of digital libraries with web-based visualizations. In: 2009 fourth international conference on digital information management, pp 1–7
Cheon MJ, Grover V, Sabherwal R (1993) The evolution of empirical research in is: a study in is maturity. Inf Manag 24(3):107–119
Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, Hassan-Montero Y, González-Molina A, Moya-Anegón F (2010) New approach to the visualization of international scientific collaboration. Inf Vis 9(4):277–287
Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Inf 5(1):146–166
Dork M, Riche NH, Ramos G, Dumais S (2012) Pivotpaths: Strolling through faceted information spaces. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 18(12):2709–2718
Dou W, Wang X, Chang R, Ribarsky W (2011) Paralleltopics: a probabilistic approach to exploring document collections. In: 2011 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST), pp 231–240
Elmqvist N, Tsigas P (2007) Citewiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Inf Vis 6(3):215–232
ertl’s homepage Thomas (2020). https://www.vis.uni-stuttgart.de/en/institute/team/Ertl/ Accessed March 8
Henry N, Goodell H, Elmqvist N, Fekete J-D (2007) 20 years of four hci conferences: a visual exploration. Int J Human-Comput Interact 23(3):239–285
Jiang X, Zhang J (2016) A text visualization method for cross-domain research topic mining. J Vis 19(3):561–576
Jusufi I, Kerren A, Liu J, Zimmer B (2014). Visual exploration of relationships between document clusters. In: 2014 international conference on information visualization theory and applications (IVAPP), pp 195–203
Kang H, Plaisant C, Lee B, Bederson BB (2007) Netlens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. Inf Vis 6(1):18–31
Karuga GG, Lowry PB, Richardson VJ (2007) Assessing the impact of premier information systems research over time. Commun Ais 19(1):7
Keathley-Herring H, Aken EV, Gonzalez-Aleu F, Deschamps F, Letens G, Orlandini PC (2016) Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics 109(2):927–951
Neely A (2005) The evolution of performance measurement research: developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(12):1264–1277
Oelke D, Strobelt H, Rohrdantz C, Gurevych I, Deussen O (2014) Comparative exploration of document collections : a visual analytics approach. eurographics 33(3):201–210
Paul-Hus A, Desrochers N, Costas R (2016) Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in web of science. Scientometrics 108(1):167–182
Shen Z, Ogawa M, Teoh ST, Ma K-L (2006) Biblioviz: a system for visualizing bibliography information. In: APVis ’06 proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific symposium on information visualisation, vol 60, pp 93–102
Shin M, Soen A, Readshaw BT, Blackburn SM, Whitelaw M, Xie L (2019) Influence flowers of academic entities. In: 2019 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST), pp 1–10
Tyman J, Gruetzmacher GP, Stasko J (2004)Infovisexplorer. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, pp r7–r7. IEEE
vilanova’s homepage A (2020). https://research.tue.nl/en/persons/anna-vilanova-bartroli Accessed March 8
White HD, McCain KW (1998) Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 49(4):327–355
yang’s homepage Jing (2020). https://cci.uncc.edu/directory/jing-yang Accessed March 8
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61836013, the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. L1924075, the 13th Five-year Informatization Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XXH13504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (mp4 185509KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, K., Wang, Y., Yu, M. et al. ConfVisExplorer: a literature-based visual analysis system for conference comparison. J Vis 24, 381–395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00703-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00703-5